------------------------------------------------------------------ A REASON FOR BELIEVING IN WIDE WIDTH RESONANCES (speculation) ------------------------------------------------------------------ What About Those RHO's ? These Rho's Have Resonance: - see further below. Let's look at the RHO particle, and see if there is any reason to believe that it should have a wide width mass. What this means is, that instead of one fitted mass, it has a mass amplitude range that expands across at least (say) 21 MeV from (say) 754 MeV to 775 MeV. The thinking comes not from the published Particle data tables of August 1994, which shows no FIT but several AVERAGES which range from 769.9 to 770.8 MeV, but rather from wave factors, which are modelled most perfectly by the planet VENUS in the solar system. The solar model is intriquing and self evident enough that there is little room to doubt that RHO resonances have a width, manifesting through at least three principle wave amplitudes, at least in this model. The assumed three are a + charge, o charge, and - charge. In fact, once again let us evoke the crescents of Venus in the night sky, and this time wait until there are no crescents. This will be when Venus is on the far side of its orbit from us, on the other side of the Sun, in a 'winter' position relative to us in 'summer'. Behold there is a wavelength, that extends across the terran solar expanse, between Earth and that far distant Venus. In this view it shall be said that Earth is in the 'Summer' position, and Venus is in the 'Winter' position at the other end of the wave, with regard to the total wave which mechanically is a two parter single length, which spans through the Sun. In fact, to complete the model, wait for a few thousand years for the orbit of Venus to precess, until Venus arrives across the Sun from the Earth at Venus' orbit Periheleon position, then wait some more until Venus is in full Venus view in Aphelion of orbit position. There are in view therefore 3 different actual waves, comprising amplitude phases of the two parter solar waves (orbits). Why is this bulge being divulged as some kind of indulgent form of physics? Because it is the bulges, the 3 amplitudes, that hold the model for the wide width resonances of the RHO meson. Here is how, and it is simple. ----------------------------------------------------------------- HOW ABOUT THOSE RHO's the picture ----------------------------------------------------------------- ILLUSTRATION 1 RHO ------------------ IMAGE 1 RHO ----------- Earth Sun Venus .----*----.------------------------- * ----------------------.--*--.----- A P P A h^/(orbit amplitude wave) = RHO MeV . . . . . . . . |........... 775.135809795 ......................| | | . . |............ 772.906160625 ........................| | . . |............. 770.689301670 ..........................| . . . | . * . |......... 767.592951402 MeV ........................| | | * . |.......... 765.406423399 MeV ..........................| | * . |........... 763.232316887 Mev ............................| . | . |....... 760.195477903 MeV ................................| | | |........ 758.050832116 MeV ..................................| | |......... 755.918253135 MeV ....................................| Experiments listing masses as low as [753.5] MeV and as high as [778.] MeV were listed in 1984 data tables. Masses listed were as low as [764.0] Mev to a high of [777.4] MeV, in the 1994 data tables. There is an implicit suggestion revealed by the RHO state facts, that particle Compton wavelengths may have eccentricy, leading to widths that can be used to factor other particle mass states exactly. The intuitive image comes from the reason that the above RHO states are factors directly related to orbit eccentricity involving the symmetry set of 3/2- XION particles (three masses) in which orbital eccentricity is not a factor, whereas Moon orbit incrementation (which mechanically is a local form of width) occurs. These RHO resonances are approx. 1/2 the MeV values of the 3/2+ XION isospin and charge states for 1/2 (Earth + Venus) + and - Moon orbit orbits. And the RHO 765.406423399 MeV state is the wave (Compton) equivalent of the full orbital sum state of (Earth + Venus). The set of RHO's also connect to three other specific mass amplitudes, as follows: ILLUSTRATION 2 RHO ------------------ IMAGE 2 RHO ----------- Earth Sun Venus .--,-*-,--.------------------------- * ----------------------.--*--.----- A P P A . h^/(orbit amplitude waves) = RHO MeV . . . |.................. 770.689301670 ..........................| . . . 1/2 of (h^ of (earth + venus) - moon) = 767.6957576605 * . |.......... 767.592951402 MeV .......................| . . 1/2 of (h^ of (earth + venus) = 765.4064023875 * . |............ 765.406423399 MeV ..........................| . . 1/2 of (h^ of (earth + venus) + moon) = 763.1307034705 * .|............... 763.232316887 Mev ............................| * 5/2 E x FSC - P+ = 763.209153735 5/2 Electron mass, power amplified by the Fine Structure Constant, minus a Proton's mass. P+ = the Proton's MeV. IMAGE 3 RHO ----------- From h^/ (Earth apheilion + Venus perihelion) = 760.195477903 MeV * |....... 760.195477903 MeV ................................| - P+ (change sign) = 178.076832097 MeV - (N^- E), divide by FSC = 1.293780661 MeV when N^ is the Neutron - Proton mass difference = 1.293318 MeV FIT Reverse engineering---- when N^ = 1.293318 MeV (N^ x FSC) = N^ amplitude 177.231111868 MeV - P+ (change sign) 761.041198131 MeV - (N^ - E) = .782318940 MeV = 760.258879196 MeV where N^ - E = 1.293318 MeV - .510999060 MeV = .782318940 MeV =================================== THESE RHO'S HAVE RESONANCE =================================== These RHO (mass/wave) resonances are interesting. In particular two particular amplitude waves have revealing modelling images with other reasons attached. The amplitude waves are shown here in ILLUSTRATION 3 and are taken from ILLUSTRATION 1 of PART 5. ILLUSTRATION 3 -------------- SUMMER WINTER Earth SUN Venus .----*----.------------------------- * ----------------------.--*--.----- A P P A h^/(orbit amplitude wave) = RHO MeV | | | |........... 763.232316887 Mev ............................| | | |....... 760.195477903 MeV ................................| Earth aphelion to Venus Perihelion, and Earth mean to Venus aphelion, are imaged. Here is what is so interesting about these: Both of these RHO (wave/mass) quantities interact with the PROTON. And each (wave/mass) individually reacts with other fundamental quantities, as follows: HANDSHAKE 1 ----------- RHO (mass/wave) resonance 763.232316887 Mev - the PROTON change sign = 175.039993113 Mev which is a good approximation of 5/2 the Electron mass x FSC where FSC is the Fine Structure Constant. This is not an idle inclusion since integer ratios of the Electron power amplified by the FSC are included in other derivations that will be shown later. HANDSHAKE 2 ----------- RHO (mass/wave) resonance = 760.195477903 MeV + 2 ELECTRON = 761.217476023 Mev - the PROTON change sign = 177.054833977 Mev + the PROTON = 1115.32714397 Mev + 2/3 E = 1115.6678100 Mev = 1/2+ LAMBDA IN THE SAME VIBRATION --------------------- RHO (mass/wave) resonance = 760.195477903 MeV + 2 ELECTRON = 761.217476023 Mev - the PROTON change sign = 177.054833977 Mev + 1/3 ELECTRON = 177.225166998 Mev x 1/FSC = 1.2932746181 Mev = N^ = Neutron MeV - Proton MeV. ------------------------ | ----------------------- PROTON MeV | diff | N^ power amplitude | ------------------------ RHO MeV ------------------------ | ----------------------- PROTON MeV | diff | RHO MeV | ------------------------ N^ power amplitude x 1/FSC = N^ (Neutron - Proton) mass difference all of which has come from one single (wave/orbit) h^/(Earth apehlion + Venus perihelion) = RHO MeV = 760.195477903 MeV = a cosmic orbit particle vibration and, an amplitude wave. --------------- end of RHO's