========================================================== Title 'HYPERWAVE ESTATES' or ELEMENTARY PARTICLE MASS HYPERWAVES ========================================================== THIS VERSION RELEASED BY GREYDON MOORE AS AN E-MAIL OF 16516 LINES TOTAL AND 557,313 K IN SIZE. (C) 1995. RELEASED JANUARY 21 1995. APPENDED JANUARY 26 1995. INTERNET ADDRESS greydon@look.com ---------------- ------------------ __________________________________________ PAPER 1 BEGIN DECEMBER 16/94 ------------------------------------------ PART 1 ABSTRACT Intro ............... Self evident Accuracies 99.999 to 99.99999 % Oddballs Higgs boson ? Top quark mass candidate ? Redundancy Particle charges Particle vrs momentum Particle spin states PROTON wavelength The word 'isospin' The illusive stable ETA Candidate for the illusive 'higgs' boson PART 2 RANGE OF GROUPING MODEL PART 3 CRITICAL CRITERIA Plank's Constant Converter Particle prediction PART 4 SOLAR PHYSICAL CONSTANTS | Interlude PART 5 DISCUSSION and MAIN INTRODUCTION | Handshakes | Reasons for Believing in wide width resonances How about those RHO's Saturn = Pion PART 6 HISTORY PART 7 CONVENTIONS PART 8 RELEVANT SIDECARS Amplitudes by the Fine Structure Constant The PROTON is just sitting there Behold the bold ELECTRON PART 9 THE EARTH/MOON METAPHOR FOR SUBATOMIC PHENOMENA Earth and Venus XIONS Predicting a XION mass These RHO's have resonance More Pi in the sky Yin Yang Amplitudes The super highway of PARTICLES A mass for the NEUTRINO Cooking the books The Cooked Books N^ Version .... These particles have persuasion Virtual Reality Its UP to the UPSILONS Poof! the CONNECTORS ---------------------- The J/PSI interlinks Summary statements PART 10 SYMMETRY FACTORS Venus Rising Su(3) Multiplex groupings Su(3) Octuplet set Su(3) Decuplet set Regards the OMEGA mass Proton (plus.minus) Ping.Pongs A ping.pong statement Decay modes seen at once The stable particles of status **** Toot! Toot ! The ETA is missing Kaon circle multiplex Kaon Geometry Image The Classical Electron Radius KAON Bubbles revisited CIRCLE Geometry NEUTRON Circle Geometry ETA Circle Geometry PART 10-A BANG BUBBLES Power bubbles for stable SIGMAs Power bubble 1 1/2+ SIGMA + Power bubble 2 1/2+ SIGMA o Power bubble 3 1/2+ SIGMA - Spoke too S O O N ! The MUON bang bubble The N^ bang bubble The E bang bubble PART 11 DESCRIPTIONS - The KAON box of fluctuating wavelengths and KAON Hyperwave sets - Fractured wavelengths - Hyperwaves - MARS playing tunes with the Proton Mars and Mercury Mars and Venus Mars and Earth Mars itself Mars and Jupiter - The JUPITER balloons for IONS - PIONS in the sky at SATURN - JUPITER bang patterns JUPITER orbital HEXAGRAM --------------------------- JUPITER hyperwave estates Full picture - The MUON and NEUTRON Sing the same song French horn N^ version PART 12 FACTORS OF THE ELECTRON PART 13 CRITICAL ACCURACY PART 14 SYMMETRY RATIO GROUPS Integer ratios BALLOON mass states Here comes the MUON BALLOONS vrs the RYDBERG ratios Speculations PART 15 KEYBOARD PART 16 CANDIDATE FOR THE ILLUSIVE 'HIGGS' BOSON PART 17 MOVE THE OUTER PLANETS OVER TO THE ELECTRON PART 18 GRAVITATIONAL CONSTANT SPECULATION PART 19 BOOMS FROM THE ROOMS OF JUPITER PART 20 THE THEORY OF FLUTTERS PART 21 INTRINSIC SYMBOLIC LOGIC PART 22 RIFF RAFF PART 23 ERRATA PART 24 THE MARRIAGE corollary | An Electron mass energy of .51099906 5 has been used throughout the following. The reason is intuitional. Things seems to co-ordinate in a slightly better way with one more digit added to the Electron's mass, so . 00000005 was used (half way between 0 and 9) for the added digit. PART 1 ------------------------------------------------------- ABSTRACT and INTRO ------------------------------------------------------------ ABSTRACT -------- Three mechanical operators yield dozens of elementary particle mass energies, including all of the stable baryons, the Decuplet baryons, and the stable Muon, Pion, and Kaons. Other mass energies also are bound within the mechanical picture, including the mass energy difference between the Proton and Neutron. The mechanical operators turn a different ego to the picture of symmetry involving the particles. In here, nucleon inner higher energy resonances are the playing field, in which lineal summed factors of particle wavelengths (Compton), add, and subtract, and combine, in patterns to compose resulting mass energies of particles. The mass energies calculated in this way are accurate to 4 to 7 digits to the known experimental 'FITS' for each of the particles involved. In all, dozens of particles are grouped into several major patterns, which includes mass splittings between different CHARGE states for many of the particle wavelengths so factored. In this scene, the particle wavelengths (Compton) are the predictable parameters, and mass energies the result. This is in complete converse to atomic physics in which Rydberg prime number ratios (whole integers) for the energy states predict electron properties for electrons in 'shell' orbits around a nucleus, and the photon wavelengths for the energy levels result non lineally. On the other hand, in the elementary particle scene per se, the wavelengths (Compton) are operators which control the picture's grouping patterns. It is a much larger scene than just the octuplet and decuplet of Su(4) symmetries, in that the basic states of both Su(3) groups are included, as are also certain Leptons, and certain Mesons, plus many Baryons not included in the scope of the original Su(3). Both Su(3) groups are housed in the larger Su(4) array, which of itself is not cited elsewhere in the datas of this disclosure. Unlike the original Bohr model of the atom, which modelled electron 'orbits' as similar to planetary orbits but was soon learned to be a non-valid representation (not the same as the actual solar system nor the electron's behavior), the razzle dazzle of the elementary particle scheme involves actual existing planetary orbits used as control models for wavelength (Compton) structures that directly yield particle mass energies in matching agreements to known charge and mass energy states for the particles involved. In fact, in the cases of stable baryons, the accuracy is uncanny, suggestion that a flowing real time dynamic recurrance of sub-atomic interactions is sitting out in space in the Solar System. The Fine Structure Constant is an intrinsic ratio between many of the parts of the grouped particles. Whole integer and whole ratio multiples of the Fine Structure Constant seem to occur but these are Whole integer ratios of the Electron, in which 1/3 and 1/2 the mass energy of the Electron are basic entity constituents which are amplified by multiples of the Fine Structure Constant. There is strong indication that a 1/3 fractional integer unit of electron mass in fact can carry a full unit of electronic charge. Where 2/3 E is seen, this may be a unit of momentum (no charge), equivalent to a 1/3 E unit of mass, and carried along with 1/3 E unit of mass plus 1 full unit of charge. (Speculation). Along the way, in essence, the wavelengths of certain high energy particles can sum as the equivalent of two wavelengths of the Proton. Or, otherwise, the wavelengths of two Protons can be found as a factor within the wavelengths of other particles. In this case, the factors are conceiled somewhat like positive and negative factors of a square root, where any whole number can be a factor of both, positive, and negative, square roots, the root of the negative square not known by taking a square root of the positive number, the root has to be known in advance, when negative. In a similar sense, wavelengths which sum to equal other wavelengths are not discernable in reverse. The task is the find such sums by looking everywhere to find them as they gradually turn up, one by one. Many such 'summed' wavelengths have been located, and are reported below, throughout this disclosure. ----------------------------------------- INTRO ----------------------------------------- SELF EVIDENT Most all of the enclosed datas are in self evident symmetry sets, or in self evident disclosures of power amplifications relating to whole integer ratio multiples of the ELECTRON, and powers of the Fine Structure Constant. The symmetries arrise from a lineal sum approach to calculating the exact masses of elementary particles. The (Neutron-Proton) mass difference is intrinsic throughout the calculations, as a self contained mass unit, and also as a partial mass unit which without the Electron works in lineal sum array with multiples of 1/3 units of the Electron mass. In effect, the Compton wavelengths of particles are sub factored into units which interlink in lineal sum ways to becomes Compton wavelengths of other particles. Such sub unitizing is deemed 'fracturing', or 'fractured' wavelengths, in this disclosure Models for seeing images as to how to control the lineal summing of the wavelength parts is readily at hand, in the existence of the Solar system, specifically in the orbits of the 6 innermost planets, and importantly the orbit of the Moon of Earth. The images, self evident in the extreme, embody symmetrical contructions, and groups of constructions also symmetrical, such that a vastly expanded picture of what is going on in the realms of fundamental physics and elementary particles is apparent without question. Most at the core of the picture, is the calculation of MASSES of particles to the nth degree of accuracy, matching the FITS gained from the best of experimental and particle accelarator observations. ACCURACIES 99.999 to 99.99999 % ---------- In concidering just the 'Self Evident' disclosures, what is shown are MASSES (mass energies) and/or momentum equivalents, calculated to 12 significant digits in the form of calculations and presented intact in the detailed methods used for presenting those facts. These high digit calculations correspond to known masses of elementary particles to an unheard of accuracy of typically 99.999 % in a field in which NO particle masses can be calculated at all by direct physical methods except for the mass of the ELECTRON. There are some correspondences shown in the EARTH MOON METAPHOR section which have the unheard of accuracy of 99.9999 % involving mass related calculations. A particular accuracy involving EARTH orbit as a (wave/orbit) factor, goes right to conclusion at 99.99999 % ODDBALLS Here and there in the disclosures, however, are included a few isolated statements which do not occur directly from means that are instantly self evident, either as a symmetry inclusion or a power amplified state. These are included just in the case that there may be a MECHANICAL offering in the background of their derived occurrence that is not seen by me, but may be useful to another investigator. On the other hand these oddballs may have no actual meaning, in which case, ignore them. HIGGS BOSON ? The illusive HIGGS boson is suggested throughout these disclosures, but no attempt is made herein to pin point any single term as HIGGS since very little has reached the public domain literatures as to exactly WHAT a HIGGS boson is. At the moment it seems nothing more than a physicist's holy grail. From the point of view of an outsider in the public domain, looking in to hard cord physics from long distance outside, most of the embodied nuckle crunchers cited in the Particle Data Review Tables for physicists as crunchy sandwich matter, in details for each and every known and suspected entity, is not digestible as a quick meal nor even snacks of a lifetime. And so a HIGGS BOSON candidate is not being pointed to herein. REDUNDANCY Oh yes! Here and there throughout, a given derivation will be shown more than once, in fact some several times. The reason for such madness is not loss of control, but the fact that each time shown, pictures the given entity in a difference model or difference configuration even though it will be the same entity just shown in different colors and a different light. PARTICLE CHARGES There is no attempt in these disclosures, to tackle anything like determining if a given MASS or mass energy equivalent, is that of a pure particle, or is a unit of associated momentum mass energy only or orbital momentum factor, without particle properties. Also, no attempt has been made to rigorously balance particle Charges, or other particle Chromodynamic quantum properties, other than to demonstrate with great clarity the existence of particle CHARGED and particle NEUTRAL states directly related to (wave/mass) derivations. As to how these seeming charges exactitudes have turned up is not addressed. Both POSTIVE and NEGATIVE charges plus NEUTRALS, are pointed out in accuracies that flash like Neon signs. PARTICLE VRS MOMENTUM As for fundamental operators seen in the models there is an intuitive suspicion that planet orbits used as models for the lineal sum factor of wave (Compton) particle components are somehow related to momentum, so also perhaps quarks and + - local orbiting entities such as the Moon, may be Quarks revealed in Images. PARTICLE SPIN STATES There are grounds for this suggestion re: QUARKS etc. In BANG IMAGE 2, under JUPITER BANG PATTERNS of PART 11, is a planet wave/orbit depiction in which Venus shown in 'winter' position on the far side of the SUN, is associated with the particle charge states of the family of 3/2- XIONS (1823) MeV. In the EARTH MOON metaphor of PART 9, from which XION counterparts to Earth and Venus orbits are detailed, the 3/2- XION state is an unexplained mystery. For instance, why is it not a 5/2+ XION for the orbital interactions of VENUS. Well, the answer to that is that, it is NOT. However, with VENUS on the far side of the SUN in a ' winter' position with respect to EARTH plus 1/2 (Earth + Venus) orbits, there is self evident a mechanical apparatus opportuning a PICTURE for the 3/2- factor, and also for the fact that there are Unstable and Stable particles involved in the EARTH MOON metaphor. The mechanical scene in BANG IMAGE 2 is offered as a powerful CLUE in discerning + and - partical JP states. PROTON WAVELENGTH No attempt has been made to use the PROTON Compton wavelength as a factoring means in deriving mass states of particles. But the use of the PROTON Compton wavelength should be possible in re-addressing some (or all) of the derivations in a different, albiet more complex, way. The simple elegance of an exact SOLAR MODEL has been maintained in order to help systematically organize and present all of the enclosed datas and derivations. In this 'exact SOLAR MODEL' approach, lineal sum factors for planet orbits can result in MeV and mass entities whose datas drift slightly from perfect exactitudes, due to the nature of reciprocals, in which lineal sum factors reciprocated are not also lineal summed on their own. Nevertheless some of the reciprocated lineal summed factors also appear in lineal sum arrangements. For instance orbits lineally summed, when reciprocated, in many instances link up as mass sequences which embody lineally summed whole and integer units of particle masses and fractured masses. In particular, the (Neutron-Proton) mass difference symbolized throughout as N^ ties together many of the main states factored. In truth, under the topic VENUS RISING, in PART 10, the N^ factor appears locked in an embrace with the planet Venus so self evident, this appears to be the result of a fundamental oscillation which exists self systained without question. What the actual oscillation might be is your guess. TASK It is anyone's task to put this information together into a valid dymanic pattern suitable for Chromodynamic Physics. A myriad of factored datas point to claims of everything from decay modes, to anti-particle mass generations. But as you will see, this disclosure has artfully stayed away from the more arcane side of that fundamental physics. Instead just the facts themselves, from derivations and strings, are put on the table and anyone who wants to dabble time to look at proper fittings into Chromo Dynamic rigors is welcome to be enjoyed. Think of how long it took to hammer the levels and spin states and orbital momentums of Quantum dynamic into a workable scheme 6 and 7 decades ago. ----------------- The word 'ISOSPIN' ----------------- It is not known by this author if the word ISOSPIN as used in this disclosure is formally correct. ISOSPIN is used to specify a charge arrangement where no formal physics dictionary term seems to actually apply. Specifically a problem is that o charge is not an actual charge state, but an absence of charge. Furthermore where a mid state mass (between two charge states) is derived, there is no single word to define that other than the category 'MIXED CHARGES', as used in the PARTICLE REVIEW DATAS, circ. '94. And so, the word ISOSPIN (from original SU(3) symmetry summaries circ. 1970 has been adopted as a buzz word (or catch-all) to denote something about a charge, or also an in-between state with no DATAS nor charges, to identify something of special note about a particle partner in wave/mass harmonic oscillations. And that explains the use of the word ISOSPIN in this disclosure. ----------------------------------------- THE ILLUSIVE STABLE ETA ----------------------------------------- In (wave/orbit/mass) harmonics, the stable ETA mass (547.45) MeV FIT has not been found. A lot of work was spent looking for a canditate. Nothing has been found. In all possible instances a derived resulting MASS was either just too big, or too small, landing on either side of the ETA mass, but not right on it. These are MAJOR misses. There seems to be nothing in Solar model harmonics that comes close. The closest candidate is a mass of roughly 555 MeV from two derivations. And nothing else has been seen. All other (wave/orbit) harmonics seem to fall outside the picture. See below under TOOT! TOOT! The ETA is missing! in PART 11 for what schetchy details can be shown for the stable ETA particle. Also find under TOOT! TOOT! an ETA that turned up totally unexpectedly when exploring MARS + PLANET interactions on December 31, 94. At that moment ETAs turned up in abundance through the wide arms of JUPITER. So ETAs exist in the interdimensional scheme of things too. Forget the opening sentence above, it is wrong. It was originally written suggesting something obtruse about ETA's, since none had been found over the years until suddenly BINGO ! plain as day reflecting a claim that all wave harmonics for particle masses are completely hidden away unseen, unknown, until hit on directly. ----------------------------------------- CANDIDATE FOR THE ILLUSIVE 'HIGGS' BOSON ----------------------------------------- In the IMAGES, a + and - factor alluding to the mean orbit of the Earth's MOON has been used throughout, in producing exact changes in states of Charge, and whole integer 1/3, 2/3, and 3/3 units of the Electron mass, and single units of + - N^. If the Moon + - feature has a (wave/orbit) equivalent mass its wave (Compton) will be in the order of 3.84401 x 10 to -17 cm and its equivalent mass energy will be in the range of [513,336] MeV more than 500 times the mass of the PROTON, or roughly about 6 times the mass energies of the W and Z Weak Vector Bosons. At that mass there will be major + - fluctuations due to variable drifts when factoring particle masses in eccentric sets with orbit/wave datas stamped in iron (as fixed constants). ======================== TOP QUARK MASS CANDIDATE ======================== The alledged 'Higgs' boson might also be a candidate for the mass of a TOP Quark. For that matter, there are bangs that are even heavier (about 5 times more so) that might be the super heavy cowboys top quark theorists expect. These can best be seen exampled under such topics as 'Jupiter Hyperwave' Estates, in Part 11. ================ OTHER CANDIDATES ================ There are other unnamed exact entities throughout this disclosure, however, none in the ultra small range of 3.84401 x 10 to -17 cm. Any of these might be concidered HIGGS candidates. The INTRO has made a lot of promises. Lets see how well they have been fullfilled. - END OF INTRO - PART 2 ------------------------------------------------------- RANGE OF GROUPING MODEL ------------------------------------------------------------ The following elementary particle masses, and fundamental constants, are linked into a common understanding via predicable understructures. STABLE | UNSTABLE ------ | -------- Electron (lepton) | Rho (meson) (charges) Muon (lepton) | 3/2+ Delta (baryon) Su3 Pion (charged) (meson) | 3/2+ Sigma (baryon) Su3 Pion (neutral) (meson) | 3/2+ Xion (baryon) (charges) Su3 Kaon (charged) (meson) | 3/2- Xion (baryon) (charges) Kaon (neutral) (meson) | ----------------- Eta (meson) | J/PSI (meson) (low) 1/2+ Proton (baryon) Su3 * | J/PSI (meson) (high) 1/2+ Neutron (baryon) Su3 | Upsilon (meson) (low) 1/2+ Lambda (baryon) Su3 | Upsilon (meson) (high) 1/2+ Sigma (baryon) Su3 | B+- Bo (meson) 1/2+ Xion (charges) (baryon) Su3 | ------------------------ | 3/2+ Omega (baryon) Su3 | | | * Su(3) are two symmetry groups, The charge states seen are the | known as the Octuplet, and the first level FITS, those listed | Decuplet, from the Su(4) set. as the main particle property. | | | OTHER Anti-particle charges and other | ----- more kinky variables are not | suggested, although there is | A suggested small mass no reason to assume they are | for the Electron Neutrino excluded. | The radius of the two biggest planets in the solar system, Jupiter and Saturn, is used to create locked in constants with 2 particles. PHYSICAL CONSTANTS ------------------ Planks Constant Planks converter = (MeV to Wave) and (Wave to MeV) Fine Structure Constant Speed of Light Neutron - Proton mass energy difference Electron Classical Radius Borh radius (orbit) of the Electron in an atom ABSTRACT CONSTANT ------------------ 1 x 10 to power -27 = Ratio of magnetude between length of a solar orbit, and equivalent particle wavelength (Compton). The following solar space lengths are linked into a common understanding with predicable understructures. DIRECT inDIRECT half waves ------ -------- Perhihelion VENUS Mean Aphelion Perhihelion 1/2 (Earth + Venus) EARTH Mean 1/2 (Earth - Venus) Aphelion 1/2 (Mars + Earth) MOON Mean 1/2 (Mars - Earth) 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter) Perhihelion MARS Mean 1/2 (Jupiter eccentricity) Aphelion JUPITER Mean Radius Eccentricity SATURN Mean radius (distance to Saturn cloudtops) PART 3 ------------------------------------------------------- CRITICAL CRITERIA ------------------------------------------------------------ ================ CRITICAL CRITERA General ================ PARTICLE MASS ENERGY CALCULATIONS --------------------------------- Particle MeV values calculated by lineal sum factors of wavelength equivalents, are accurate typically to 4 to 7 significant digits. PLANETARY ORBITAL CALCULATIONS ------------------------------ Corresponding solar orbits likewise obtained as lineal sum factors from corresponding MeV values, are accurate typically to 4 to 6 significant digits. =================================================================== SUMMARY SCHEMATIC Lineal summed wavelengths TABLE 1 showing unitary expansion rates. =================================================================== + - increments are the Moon mean obit added and subtracted to all wave lineal sums involving Earth and Venus orbits. -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ------- + unit sum (moon orbit) (1319) -------|--- original FROM EARTH ------- - unit sum (moon orbit) - - - - - - - - ------- + unit sum (moon orbit) (1531) -------|--- original FROM 1/2 ------- - unit sum (moon orbit) EARTH + VENUS - - - - - - - - ------- + unit sum (moon orbit) (1823) -------|--- original FROM VENUS ------- - unit sum (moon orbit) ------------------------------------------------------------ SUMMARY SCHEMATIC Converted to MeV's, showing non TABLE 2 lineal expansion rates due to the nature of RECIPROCALS. ------------------------------------------------------------ where (....) is the MeV mass of a known particle. (1315) --------- + (unit sum) (moon orbit) |+ difference |--> (1319) --------|---- from EARTH Mean orbit | 1/2+ Xion |- different difference | (1322) *-------- - (unit sum) (moon orbit) | | | | *|* expanded bridge | | *|* | | | (1526) *-------- + (unit sum) (moon orbit) | | | |+ big difference |-> (1531) ---------|---- from 1/2 (EARTH + VENUS) mean orbits |--> 3/2+ Xion |- bigger difference | | | | | (1535) *-------- - (unit sum) (moon orbit) | | | | *|* | | *|* greatly expanded bridge | | *|* | | | (1817) *-------- + (unit sum) (moon orbit) | | | |+ larger difference | | |-> (1823) ---------|---- from VENUS mean orbit 3/2- Xion | |- largest difference | | (1830) --------- - (unit sum) (moon orbit) ------------------------------------------------ ACCURACY CRITERIA All datas ------------------------------------------------ All Physical Contants used are listed on Page 1233 of the Physical Review D Particles and Fields, 1 August, 1994, Part 1, Volume 50, Third Series, Number 3, published by The American Physical Society through the American Institute of Physics, and Great Britain allies. Used throughout this disclosure is the Fine Structure Constant. Its value is the ratio: 137.0359895 . In all of the following, the Bar H value of Plank's Constant is used. And to simply the equations, a standardized version of the Compton wavelength MeV conversion to wavelength, and visa versa, has been used exclusively, called 'Converter', this is: PLANK'S CONSTANT CONVERTER -------------------------- Plank's Constant value of (6.5821220 x 10 -22MeV s) speed of light times (2.99792458 x 10 to power 10 cm s-1) equals (1.9732705332 MeV -11cm) times 1000 equals (1973.2705332 MeV -14cm) equals h^ = converter h^ as constantly symbolized, is used as follows: For routine convenience, a Planks Constant Converter factor for Compton wavelength / MeV is the term: 1973.2705332 used for all calculations and is symbolized as Planks Constant Coverter = h^ . All particle mass energy data is expressed in MeV. All particle Compton wavelength equivalents are given in terms of (1 x 10 to the power -14 cm). All solar orbits are given in terms of (1 x 10 to the power 13 cm). In which case, symbol h^ has three implicit Converter values: 1. 1973.2705332 MeV -14cm when just converting straight back and forth between a mass energy, and equivalent Compton wavelength. 2. 1973.2705332 x (1 x 10 to power -27) when starting with a solar orbit, and ending with conversion to an MeV. 3. 1973.2705332 x (1 x 10 to power 27) when starting with an MeV and ending with a solar orbit (wave) equivalent. The term, (1 x 10 to power + - 27), itself is thus used generically as a universal conversion in magnetude, for instance whenever starting with a particle wavelength (Compton) and ending with a SOLAR orbit equivalent. ------------------------------------------------ UNIVERSAL CONVERSION CONSTANT ------------------------------------------------ Power magnetudes subatomic-to-solar and visa versa are taken for granted and not specified, upon each occurrence or use of the 'converter' constant h^. All uses of the symble h^ have inplicit inclusion of magnetitude conversion, when solar orbits, or particle wavelengths, are being converted by Plank's Constant h^, when such magnetitude conversion is an explicit factor. The power conversion's magnetude is not shown as a term in the derivations of particle masses, and/or equivalent solar orbit modelling, for the sake of simplicity and clarity regards detailing the actual entities, terms, and factors involved. In all, however, the universal converter constant (1 x 10 to power + - 27) is expected to be implicitely taken for granted. The term h^ with digit value 1973.2705332 is the only item which needs to be programmed in the strings or equations used in runs through a calculator to make the datas of this disclosure. The difference between an orbit, and an MeV factor is so easily seen that just the digit value of h^ is enough for ALL of the equations and strings. The digits of h^ are the handiest form of shorthand imaginable. Powers of 10 (EXPONENTS) just get in the way. Free floating point decimal is the way to go in the fast lanes, letting h^ do the bookeeping all by itself in keeping track of magnetitudes. ------------------------------------------------ CONVERSION CONSTANT CONVENTION ------------------------------------------------ Two conventions in the use of h^ are used, and only the two. h^/(1823.57393767) means an MeV converted to wavelength. In this case, the mass of a 3/2- XION state is converted to wavelength. In this example, the wavelength can also be in fact the actual orbit of planet VENUS. h^/(Venus) means an ORBIT converted to MeV. In this case, the orbit of VENUS is stated, being converted to a particle equivalent MeV, in which a change in magnetude of (10 to -27) is taken for granted. h^/ 1/2 (Earth + Venus) - moon means 1/2 the sum of Earth and Venus orbits, to which is then subtracted the orbit of the Earth's moon, (the wave then converted to MeV). h^/ 1/2 (Jup eccentricity) - moon h^/ 1/2 (Jup eccentricity - moon) two fundamentally different characteristics are illustrated here in which the moon orbit is added to an entity, before the 1/2 value is converted. This seeming small change can have major consequence in resulting factors corresponding to particle MASS states. h^ conversions from orbit to particle MeV are the the most common direction of transformation in the uses of h^ in this disclosure. ----------------- COSMIC RECURRANCE Simplified 'Slide Rule' System ----------------- In this rational, a Cosmic recurrance, not reciprocal or mirror, but recurrance, is pictured. This is as if a mighty slide rule measuring inside sub-atomic wave/mass events is just slid along through the dimension of space growing larger as it slides, until suddenly, measures marked as the sub-atomic scope of the scale presto ! match up more or less PERFECTLY to solar measures in the COSMIC scale occurring as 1 SOLAR planet orbits 2 Distances between orbits 3 Distances comprising two orbits summed, in which such distances are most easily pictured as two different, orbits with the planets on either side of the SUN. 4 1/2 of a sum. (1/2 waves). 5 Any sum of two orbits, or difference between, plus and minus the Moon orbit, and plus and minus a planet radius. EXAMPLE 1 --------- An example of Compton wavelength (to) MeV conversion letting h^ do the easy work of keeping track of magnitudes. h^ 1973.2705332 / 3861.59323 wave = .510999065853 MeV and h^ 1973.2705332 / (.510999065853) MeV = 3861.593274 wave in which the Electron mass is converted to the Electron's Compton wavelength, and visa versa. In this case, the 'power magnetude ratio' (1 x 10 to power 27) is not needed and therefore not assumed. EXAMPLE 2 --------- Another example of Compton wavelength (to) MeV conversion letting h^ do the easy work of keeping track of magnitudes. h^ 1973.2705332 / 1.49597927 wave = 1319.04938308 MeV and h^ 1973.2705332 / (1319.04938308) MeV = 1.49597927 wave in which the 1/2+ Stable Xion isospin mass is converted to Compton wavelength, and visa versa. In this case, a wave measure (compton) of (1 x 10 to -14 cm) is assumed, knowing that a Compton wave is involved. In this case, the magnetitude power ratio has not been assumed, since only subatomic details are illustrated. In this case, the 'power magnetude ratio' (1 x 10 to power 27) is not needed and therefore not assumed. EXAMPLE 3 --------- Another example of Compton wavelength (to) MeV conversion using the simplified 'slide rule' system is as follows: h^ 1973.2705332 / 1.49597927 orbit = 1319.04938308 MeV and h^ 1973.2705332 / (1319.04938308) MeV = 1.49597927 orbit in which the 1/2+ Stable Xion isospin mass is gained from a solar orbit model, and visa versa. The solar model is the orbit of the EARTH. In this case, a wave measure (solar) of (1 x 10 to 13 cm) is assumed, knowing that a solar orbit (wave) is involved. In this case, since the solar orbit model is the mean orbit of the Earth, the magnetude power ratio (1 x 10 to power -27) has also been assumed, since Cosmic and subatomic details are both illustrated and linked in the same statement. ------------------------------------------------ ACCURACY CRITERIA All datas ------------------------------------------------ ACCURACY In each EXAMPLE (1 2 and 3) maximum accuracy is shown maintained throughout (all available digits to 12 digits plus a decimal point are used where applicable), using a solid state calculator device with intrinsic 13 digit free floating decimals accuracy (Monroe 326 Scientist, Circ. 1971), an old but very reliable device. An original mechanical motor driven Monroe Marchand calculator can do the same calculations in slow mode (all datas one by one, hand entered. The Monroe 326 has 12 registers to instantly store and recall any datas displayed in its single line view screen. 'Store' and a 'Recall', are the two keys used to handle store and recall, by instant toggle key stokes. No programming, or special logic is required by this device's inherent simplicity. Twelve memory registers are nowhere enough for the kind and size of project constituting this disclosure, so most calculations were hand done, by writing down digital results, then re-entering the results as needed by hand. Seven of the data registers held terms most frequently used for instantly 'cached' RECALLs toggled as needed. Using digits to maximum accuracy has the inherent advantage of instantly 'seen', instantly 'understood'. No guesswork about internal factors seen in the memory in the mind's eye but not seen outwardly at a glance. What you see, is what you've got, is the fundamental truth of it. Hence, digits that compare to 6 and 7 figures are instantly seen, and recognized as interesting. To many authorities, this hand-entry approach may seem very tedious as a way of life, but it has the advantage that the mind can stay sharply tuned to exact factors and statements under exploration, involving specific properties for both of particle physics and solar physics datas, without slugging through extra brainwork translating back and forth through an equipment's extra thought demands, for instance, in the programming and re-programming of a large computer to do calculations in an add hoc manner, or using a modern day sophisticated pocket calculator with any number of memory registers, and peculiar programming logics needed to access the 'learn' and 'replay' features for each step, or to access routines hard wired in add-on circuit modules. Or more to the point, in translating algebras trying to determine statistically if two different coded algebras can have the same digit results. You know the problem, process slows to a drawl keeping track of codes, rather than glancing at resulting digits in an instant of awareness, in an instant of illumination. Thus all digits are expressed to their full unless otherwise noted as short forms. Such maximum accuracy is used throughout for data details in this disclosure, since such displayed accuracy makes it very simple to cross check, and double check datas, without recourse to a photographic memory or the need to redo tasks again and again to re-affirm in detail prior results. What you see, is what you've got, is the motive for using such high digital details. This is said to re-assure thinkers who ignore digits and rely on codes, that the answers all finally lay in the digits anyway, so why bother with the codes. Datas to 3 and 4 digits are pointless. Datas to the standard 8 significant digits of most pocket calculators are too poor to be definative. Datas to 10 significant digits as with many better calculators, are ambiguous. 12 digit accurracy is a bottom line for making decisions. SYMBOLIC LOGIC In preparing this disclosure, it has been found extremely helpful to have at hand full digital details, voiding the necessity of having to redo calculations, and by sight to verify results in 1/10th of a second. In some parts of the disclosure, symbolic logic terms are used for statements rather than digital details, and in some cases, both symbolic logics, and digital details, are incorporated in statements to help make the statement's intent more intuitively self evident. In all instances, (pure symbolic logic) and (both digital details and symbolic logic), having a high digital detail record of certain terms for immediate eyeball reference is mandatory for speed in pursuing and verifying steps and calculations and further explorations for symmetries and patterns. The difficulty has always been, looking for an answer where the answer is unknown until it is found, in which in many or most instances, the question solved by the answer is also not known until there is an answer with which to formulate the question. In this kind of venue, information gradually unfolds as facts gradually accumulate. Eventually enough facts seem to accumulate to form a seeming pattern with predictable variants. When the variants are tried and the results are confirmed, as already predicted in thought, then and only then can a question be posed to which the answer already has been found. When the question appears it is already solved, in the same act. The philosphy thus has been to probe and poke around in a venue of great mystery, until its secrets gradually start to line up in place on the kitchen table. It is a 'home work' kind of project, with many notes initially recorded in 'short hand' until the notes can be fit into a more detailed view once their mysterious 'acts' are understood. The result of this 'home work' and 'short hand notes' form of data explorations and recording of results, has resulted in a main grunt of the datas being disclosed in this paper compiled in a brief three day period using the Monroe 326 Scientist solid state calculator (with an intrinsic accuracy to 13 significant digits), and this disclosure typed into a PCB 386 computer in another 6 weeks, with added datas being incorporated on an ongoing basis, swelling the original data burst from 1200 lines to over 15,000. This time span is not a very long haul in putting together a large picture from a number of previous sporadic insights gained over a twenty seven year period. In the three days, the 'symmetry ratio group' detailed in full under PART 14 was now seen for the first time, something like finding a big carot diamond hidden in the middle of a large broach or necklace with many diamonds, which has already been studied many times and many times again not from a jeweller's point of view but from an outsider looking for more understanding regards the necklace's inherent beauty. The 'symmetry ratio group' seen for the first time during day two of the three day work period, was seen for the first time, and found by co-incidental searches in factoring the datas. It has been briefly described as 'The Discovery' under PROTOTYPE in the SU(3) discussions of PART 10. It was an unexpected find, in other words. - R.S.L. author ------------------------------------------------ CRITICAL CRITERIA Particle Datas ------------------------------------------------ All Particle Datas come from the pages of the Physical Review D Particles and Fields, 1 August, 1994, Part 1, Volume 50, Third Series, Number 3, published by The American Physical Society through the American Institute of Physics, with Great Britain allies. MASSES All particle mass datas are given in terms of MeV without exception. (GeV's are not used). All solar datas are given in terms of cms. (Meters are not used). In which case a Binding Energy for the electon is given as .oooo136056981 MeV and orbit of the Moon as .oo384401 x 10 to 13 cm . Rather than repeating the term MASS ENERGY in all citations, the word MASS is just used for rapid reading of text. In all uses of the word MASS, 'mass energy' may be explicity implied, and also just energy in cases where momentum and not particle MeV may be involved. No momentums, or width energies, or other energies, are cited in this disclosure. All references to MASS, and to MASS ENERGY, refers exclusively to the mass energy of a particle, having a wave (Compton) equivalent, except where Binding Energies are specifically cited. However a given mass may not be replete with properties, it may be momentum in view. To stay away from conundrums, a cited mass can therefore stand for both a particle's mass energy equivalent or an equivalent momentum amount. Conundrums are presented as is, with other hands, other minds, expected to resolve the questions. FIT, VRS INDIVIDUAL EXPERIMENTS 'EXPMT' Where 'FIT' MeV's are shown to be reasonably in a picture (in an illustration of wave/mass symmetry or understructure), the 'FIT' MeV is shown in [brackets], the same as listed in the Particle Data Tables. Where a mass from an individual experiment is shown instead, then ( ) brackets are used for the MeV value. And sometimes also the term EXPMT for 'individual experiment'. So that 1/2+ XION [1314.9] MeV FIT is the best thought candidate for that particle's MeV by physicists. And 1/2+ XION (1315.2) MeV EXPMT is from a single experiment. And 1/2+ XION 1315.15769304 MeV might be shown as a mass derived from a (wave/orbit) factor, in this case from a sum of Earth orbit plus the Moon orbit, minus ELECTRON mass. So, no brackets. (......) MeV EXPMT are not cited very often in this disclosure. Most all particle datas cited are FITS. There are certain states however, which do not have FITS, and so (.....) single experiment values may be cited in lieu of AVERAGE. For instance in the symmetry group elsewhere descibed as 'The Earth Moon Metaphor for Subatomic Phenomena' two of three well defined wave/mass groups involving XION states have both 'FIT' values for a Negative and Neutral charge state for one of the particles. And just a single 'FIT' state for the other, but there are individual experiments showing mass differences for both Negative and Neutral occurrences for that other. And so, the states are described in both [ ] and ( ) brackets. For example, here is a segment taken from TABLE 4 in this disclosure, in which [ ] brackets clearly identify 'FIT' masses, and ( ) brackets clearly identify 'INDIVIDUAL EXPERIMENT' masses. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From TABLE 4 illustrating generic use of ( ) and [ ] brackets. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- status + | MOON Xion o 1315.66 869213 MeV [1315.2] **** EARTH ---|-- 1/2+ Xion 1319.04 938310 MeV - | MOON Xion - 1322.44 749261 MeV minus 1 electron = 1321.93 649355 MeV [1321.87] **** - - - - - - - - - - 1/2 + | MOON Xion o 1526.26 140694 MeV (1527) EARTH + VENUS ---|-- 3/1+ Xion 1530.81 284775 MeV [1530] **** - | MOON Xion - 1535.39 151532 MeV (1535.0) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- WAVES All particle wave (Compton) datas are given in terms of (1 x 10 to -14 cm), even though no system of units is actually cited. Instead, wave (Compton) typically denotes a Compton wavelength. The 'FITS' (most likely mass) for many particle masses have been identified or targeted in calculations. However many particle 'states' do not have 'FITS' corresponding to wave calculations, whereas individual experiments do. These individual experiment masses are thus quoted. For example, the 3/2+ XION particle of the Su(3) decuplet symmetry group is listed as a single 'FIT state of [1530] MeV, but experiment masses are listed for individual Negative charged, and Neutral occurrences. Since individual experimental occurrences actually match MeV masses calculated from wave (Compton) factors, the individual experimental MeV masses are quoted, and the single 'FIT' value is merely identified as being intrinsic, and is shown to be not the only data worth concidering in this disclosure. No rigorous attachment to any particular experiment or date of experiment has been adopted as a rule or law. The only 'RULE' is in looking to the 'lowest' deviations amongst experiments for closest approximation to digital correspondences otherwise calculated by waves (Compton). PARTICLE PREDICTION ------------------- Only one particle state, a higher mass charged XION from the ?/?- (2250) status ** occurrence is being suggested as a target particle for experimental search. The mass suggested is close to or at the quantity 2264.7 MeV. The only criteria for suggesting this specific mass state is that it can be shown linked to the well defined set of three XION isospin states identified through wave (Compton) lineal sum symmetry elsewhere in this disclosure as the 'Earth Moon Metaphor For Subatomic Phenomena'. The metaphor calls for three isospin/charge XION state masses occurring in a fourth XION group, and two exact mass agreements already exist for that particle's set of three masses expected by the metaphor. The two existing agreements are 2244.93227903 MeV assume a Neutral charge 2254.79298018 MeV assume an isospin predicted 2264.74068833 MeV assume a Negative charge in the ?/? XION (2250) STATUS ** particle which already has ?/? XION (2244) experiment (no assigned charge) ?/? XION (2250) estimate (no assigned charge) Thus the third mass occurrence [2264.7] MeV is suggested as also existing. See details under 'Predicting a XION Mass', in PART 9. ------------------------------------------------- CRITICAL CRITERIA Solar System Datas ------------------------------------------------- All planetary orbit data (including Moon orbits) has been assumed in terms of (10 to the power 13 cm) for the sake of universal consistency. It is assumed that the orbit of Venus is the most well measured, in spite of the AU (Astronomical Unit) standard based on Earth's orbit. In view of this assumption judgement calls are preferred to the Venus mean of orbit. In other words, discrete variations of the Earth orbit are shown resulting from lineally summed plus or minus factors, using the full value of Venus mean of orbit in calculations. ---------------------------------------------------- SOLAR SYSTEM UNIVERSE Text and Paintings by Don dixon DATA ARE FROM: Houghton Mifflin company Boston 1981. ---------------------------------------------------- PLANETARY QUANTITIES pages 220-235 ---------------------------------------------------- which used refined details from the Jet Propulsion Laboratory released to the author (Dixon) in 1981. ---------------------------------------------------- AND INCLUDE: AU = Astronomical Unit = (1.49597927 x 10 to 13 cms) = Earth's mean of orbit. Orbits (orbital Means, Perihelions, and Aphelions) are thus converted from the PLANETARY QUANTITIES tables, by multiplying all AU values by (1.49597927 x 10 to the 13 cms). PART 4 ------------------------------------------------------- SOLAR PHYSICAL CONSTANTS TABLE 3 ------------------------------------------------------------ --------------------------- Perhelion = .4600515121 x 10 to the 13 cms MERCURY orbit = .579092027 x 10 to the 13 cms Aphelion = .698169037 x 10 to the 13 cms --------------------------- Perhelion = 1.074745915 x 10 to the 13 cms VENUS orbit = 1.082089677 x 10 to the 13 cms Aphelion = 1.089433439 x 10 to the 13 cms --------------------------- Perhelion = 1.470963504 x 10 to the 13 cms EARTH orbit = 1.49597927 x 10 to the 13 cms Aphelion = 1.520995035 x 10 to the 13 cms Perhelion = .00356400 x 10 to the 13 cms MOON = .00384401 x 10 to the 13 cms Aphelion = .00406700 x 10 to the 13 cms --------------------------- Perhelion = 2.066565211 x 10 to the 13 cms MARS orbit = 2.279410149 x 10 to the 13 cms Aphelion = 2.492255088 x 10 to the 13 cms --------------------------- Perhelion = 7.406184963 x 10 to the 13 cms JUPITER orbit = 7.783285433 x 10 to the 13 cms Aphelion = 8.160385904 x 10 to the 13 cms eccentricity = .37710047 x 10 to the 13 cms radius = .000690840 x 10 to the 13 cms --------------------------- Perhelion = 13.47581264 x 10 to the 13 cms SATURN orbit = 14.269906899 x 10 to the 13 cms Aphelion = 15.064032535 x 10 to the 13 cms radius = .00060330 x 10 to the 13 cms radius distance to cloud tops --------------------------- Perhelion = 27.340068344 x 10 to the 13 cms URANUS orbit = 28.695724759 x 10 to the 13 cms Aphelion = 30.051381173 x 10 to the 13 cms --------------------------- Perhelion = 44.580032648 x 10 to the 13 cms NEPTUNE orbit = 44.965845701 x 10 to the 13 cms Aphelion = 45.351658744 x 10 to the 13 cms --------------------------- Perhelion = 44.237602993 x 10 to the 13 cms PLUTO orbit = 58.999926429 x 10 to the 13 cms Aphelion = 73.762249865 x 10 to the 13 cms --------------------------- PART 5 ------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSSION and MAIN INTRODUCTION ------------------------------------------------------------ The approach used for this disclosure is to take information out of the assumptive or theoretic range and present it in the form of Self Evident materials. Picture how easy new insights can be. For instance, make the Compton wavelength for the stable Xion particle from the Octuplet group, whose properties are 1/2+ Xion with two charge states, Neutral and Negative. In fact, make the wavelength for both states, the Negative 1322.3 MeV, and the Neutral 1315.7 MeV. Average the two wavelengths by adding the two and dividing by two, and make the wavelength for the average also. And also, subtract the wavelength for the Negative from the average, and subtract the Average from the Neutral. In order words, treat them with some simple lineal sum factoring. Bear with this, the Neutral state's FIT is 1314.9 MeV and this will be seen further on, in PART 9. You should have a small plus and minus wavelength increment in the neighborhood of (3.84 x 10 to the -17 cm), as a result of the simple lineal sum factoring upon the Compton wavelengths. Also, verify that the MeV value for the average of the two Compton wavelengths of the two charge states of the stable 1/2+ Xion is roughly 1319.04 MeV. Keep all your datas on a sheet of paper, you will need them. PHASE TWO of the new solutions: Go to the 3/2- unstable Xion of mass range 1823 MeV. Make its wavelength, and both add and subtract the sub-unit (3.84 x 10 to the -17 cm) to this wavelength and make Compton wavelengths for both new sums, and you will see resulting wavelengths for two more Xion states, the Negative at 1830 MeV, and the Neutral, at 1817 MeV. Now we are ready to actually hit our original goal. PROOF! Here it is. Add together the two averaged wavelengths, (for the 1319.04 MeV value, and 1823 MeV value), and divide by two. Then add and subtract the SAME sub-unit (3.84 times 10 to the -17 cm) to the new average, and make two new Compton wavelengths. These two new wavelengths you will find correspond accurately to two Xion states from the Decuplet Xion group, to wit, the 3/2+ Xion Neutral state of 1527 MeV, and the 3/1 Xion Negative state of 1535 MeV, with a mean state in between of 1530 MeV. And there you have it, three fundamental Xion resonances in which both charge states for each resonances are precisely calculated as mass energies, directly achieved by using only the Compton Wavelengths, changed by fractured lineal sum factors, through each of the six charge particles. But is THIS A L L T H E R E I S ? No way, says an intuitive whisper, subliminally. There is more, much more. The sound amplifying to a R O A R ! Look to the Solar system, in fact look right out your patio door into the night sky when the Moon is up and so is Venus. Let your imagination take a journey into the core of matter. Let your imagination take a journey into the reaching heart of outer space. And see in the mind's eye if the two can be merged into one. The fact is they can, and here is how ... Let the Earth's mean of orbit stand for a Compton wavelength. You do not have to do anything to achieve this, just merely reduce the size of the Earth's mean of orbit by a magnetude of (1 times 10 to the power 27), so that instead of being 1.4957 x 10 to the 13 cm, it is now 1.4957 x 10 to the -14 cm. Do the same for the Earth's mean of orbit PLUS the Moon's mean of orbit (equivalent to the Moon in FULL Moon position), and also minus the Moon's mean of orbit (equivalent to the Moon in NEW Moon position), and reduce both by the power ratio of (1 x 10 to the power 27), and claim both measures are now Compton Wavelengths. Then by the standard established conversion equation (plank's constant = 1973.2705332 MeV -14cm) convert both wavelengths to mass energy equivalents. The results will be 1315.7 MeV for the original (Earth + FULL Moon's orbit), and 1322 MeV for the (Earth - NEW Moon's orbit). You can see at once these these two values are right on target for the two stable Xion particle charge states of 1315.2 MeV plus an Electron mass (for the Neutral 1/2+ Xion), and 1322.2 for the Negative 1/2+ Xion. The Earth's mean of orbit itself converts to an MeV of 1319 MeV, just in case you wanted to know. (1315.2) is the best physics experiment value for this Xion. NOW we are starting into earnest regions of disclosure, here. Because the picture continues. To be exact, couple planets Earth and Venus into an interaction. Here is how. Add the Mean orbit of the Earth, to the Mean orbit of Venus, divide by two, and to the result, add and subtract the Moon's mean of orbit, and make equivalent Compton wavelengths exactly in the same way as described above for the Earth. You will see without hestitation that the results are intriguing indeed. The results are matched right on the mark by properties of the 3/2+ unstable Xion from the Decuplet group, to wit; 1526 MeV for the Neutral 3/2+ Xion from ((Earth + Venus orbits divided by 2) + the Full Moon's orbit)) and 1535 MeV for the Negative 3/2+ Xion from ((Earth + Venus orbits divided by 2) - the New Moon's orbit)). Notice that I in fact used the orbit of Venus to get this second set of Xion states. So what about Venus orbit itself. You have probably already guessed the outcome of THAT question, since we are on a roll, here. Yes, in fact, the Mean orbit of Venus itself, to which is added and subtracted the Moon's orbit, translates into the charge states of the third Xion family already specified above in the opening conjectures before Solar orbits were introduced. The Xion states obtained from the orbit of Venus itself are; 3/2- Neutral 1817 MeV, and 3/2- Negative 1830 MeV, with an inbetween state of (1823) MeV which is listed as that particle's precise FIT mass in the Particle Data Table. Notice that I did not have to fudge an inch to get these 3 sets of particles straight from solar orbit models. Right away there are astounding recurrances afoot. Firstly, adding and subtracting a given unit of a small piece of Compton wavelength to larger wavelengths produces disportionate results which are not lineal sum values when the wavelengths are converted to mass energy states, due to mathematical properties no more mysterious than the common numerological nature of reciprocals. In this case, however; three Xion families all cooking together on the same hotline; the disproportionate stretching of lineal summed Compton wavelengths, results in exact calculation of resulting MeV mass energy values, close to detail regarding charge/mass splits, whose differences one state to another, and one family to another, are definative and yet definately NOT lineal. Two principles are established in the one disclosure: 1. Lineal sum factoring of Compton Wavelengths, can yield exact mass energy states of resulting particle masses. 2. The solar system holds a blueprint for a mighty cosmically visible, easily seen with the naked eye, recurrance of an easy inter-particle fabrication, based on the lineal sum factoring of Compton Wavelengths. 1-a. The ability to describe new physics can get awkward in direct proportion to the new physics being disclosed, in a logarythmic expanding confusion imparted by the disposer's lack of quality physics termnology. 1-b. The solution is to go with the flow, do the best with termnology and expertise at hand. As long as another reader can follow the discloser's logic, physics is served. WE ARE NOT FINISHED Another major recurrance containing an intrinsic image involves Earth and Venus again. In this case it is the distance itself between the two planets (the space that separates them) which is involved. Here is how to see that picture. Subtract the mean orbit of Venus from the mean orbit of Earth. Divide this sum in half. Reduce the result by the power ratio of (1 x 10 to the power -27), and call this a Compton wavelength. It will be a Compton wavelength for a mass energy of 9535.25077882 MeV. How might we double check this occurrence (seek to find the occurrance from other means)? Try some play. For instance it has also been noted that the Electron mass times the Fine Structure Constant squared, is a mass result of 9595.98104359 MeV. Since this is a rare mass, in a particle mass region of rarified atmosphere with next to nothing there, look to the datas of the Review of Particle Properties tables, for an MeV for the mass energy range of 9535.25 MeV. It turns out there is none. Rarified air indeed. But wait a minute, there is an UPSILON meson, with a published mass state of 9460 MeV's. The difference between this, and the 9595.98104359 MeV calculated immediately above, is 135.98104 MeV, which has an approximation, in the form of the negative Pion mass of 134.9764 MeV, also a rarified air occurrence with nothing else around it. In fact, 135.98104 minus 2 Electron masses lands at 134.95904 MeV which is pretty ballpark to the mass of the known negative Pion, at 134.9764 MeV FIT. This is the kind of data piece which gets noted, to be looked over in more detail later. (Author's comment). Substituting the real Pion- mass, then the resulting mass approximates the Upsilon mass, to a near perfect exactness, to wit 9461.00464359 MeV, compared to the actual experimental mass currently published in 1994 for the S 1 U(9460) particle, of (9460.37) MeV. Things are starting to look better. In fact this almost looks like sculpting numbers from the Great Pyramid to fit a theory, until the numbers are examined in detail. Great co-incidences become apparent, great because certain numbers are so close to one another, in fact so close, that co-incidence can be ruled out. Remember, at this moment we are discussing rarified atmospheres. Rarified indeed. Here goes some sculpting: The mass difference between the charged Pion and neutral Pion is in a FIT range of 4.5936 MeV. And also, an invisible mass energy equivalent to the classical Electron radius is the Electron mass times the Fine Structure Constant, being 70.0252618 Mev; a mass energy not known to correspond to a particle or physical entity, but IS the energy equivalent for the Classical Electron Radius. Nevertheless, when it is added to the Upsilon mass (derived from the Electron plus neutral Pion masses), the result is a mass of 9531.02990545 Mev which differs from the afore shown mass of 9535.25077882 MeV (derived from the orbits of Earth and Venus) by 4.220873408 MeV. See how close this is to the Pion (charged-neutral) mass difference of 4.5913 MeV. When this scientific mass difference is instead added to the mass of 9531.02990545 MeV, the result is 9535.62350545 MeV. Intuition forces the hand to type and enter the calculations to convert this derived figure (9535.62350545) MeV backwards to an original derived term for 1/2 the orbital distance between Earth and Venus. Adding twice the resulting orbital WAVE piece to the orbit of Venus results in an orbit value of 1.4959 6309 x 10 to 13 cm. The Earth mean of orbit is 1.4959 7927 x 10 to 13 cm. Why; the difference is hardly any more or less than the radius of the Moon. This derived value deviates at the 6th significant digit from the published value of the Earth's mean of orbit. It is a calculation that is 99.99 89185 % accurate. Just for the heck of it, with the Moon radius added, (.oooo1738), the percentage of error vanishes, such that 1.4959 6309 x 10 to 13 cm. + .oooo1738 x 10 to 13 cm. = 1.4959 8047 x 10 to 13 cm. compared to 1.4959 7927 x 10 to 13 cm. EARTH ORBIT No 10% physics here, nor even 2%, this stuff is tough, with percentages of error of 1/100th of a percent and less, gained at once over HUGE ranges and leap frog giant spreads within elementary particle masses. The above Upsilon meson - Solar orbit - Pion particle - Electron intrinsic wave/mass interaction is summarized in an illustrative schematic elsewhere to be found under ITS UP TO THE UPSILONS, in PART 9. What, exactly, has just been done, here. That is hard to say in a few words. Mainly, terms factored from particle mass splits, and fundamental mass energies amplified by whole ratio powers of the Fine Structure Constant, have been individually shown associated in great detail to the mass of a fundamental Upsilon Meson, the (9460) FIT particle. But further, the same fundamental mass amplitude structure has been linked to a mechanical model based on lineal sum wave terms, in a model taken directly from the dynamic solar system. The WAVE terms are themselves whole sound and perfect if factored entirely in pure form, as lineal sum units of Compton wavelengths taken from two existing Xion particles; one (1319) MeV from the so-called Su(3) octplet symmetry group; and the second (1530) MeV from the so-called Su(3) decuplet symmetry group. See EXAMPLES in PART 10. It may be co-incidence that the solar mechanical modelling of the same pure 'Compton' wavelength lineal sum factoring is in fact identical in terms of results. It may even be that lineal sum factoring of particle waves (Compton) taking the waves from Xion states, is also a co-incidence. This could be true if this was the only WAVE/MASS particle manifestation ever shown. But that is not the case, as this disclosure is already beginning to demonstrate in abundance. Further to this, the region of the solar system from which the wave mechanical model is taken is intrinsically associated with a much larger major symmetry particle (mass * charge) grouping system, being shown in detail elsewhere under yuppi buzz words called 'The Earth Moon Metaphor For Subatomic Phenomena'. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- A REASON FOR BELIEVING IN core harmonics wave/energies ----------------------------------------------------------------------- The above line of reasoning, beginning at 'WE ARE NOT FINISHED!' is not the only line of reasoning to which the UPSILON meson can be shown to be openly involved in (wave/harmonic) interactions. In fact, both planets MARS, and JUPITER, also have (wave/mass) orbit states which tie in, as will be shown further below. Also, a larger overview ties in the (wave/mass) orbit states directly to both the high and low masses of the J/PSI (3097) particle. To show these tie-ins, now is the time to introduce an illustrating method, and a method of itemizing the illustrated material in small derivations called 'Handshakes'. ILLUSTRATION 0 -------------- h^/(orbit amplitude wave) = UPSILON harmonic 1/2 wave | Earth | Venus Sun .----*----.------------------------.--*--.------------------------ * A P | A P | | | | | | | 3/2+ Xions | |.............................................. |................................| |...............| Upsilon Let the following letters typically stand for the following: A = Aphelion of an orbit * = Mean of an orbit P = Perhelion of an orbit In Illustrations, all planets will be shown along an obital (wave) length, or solar base line, just as depicted immediately above in schematic fashion. The tendency to wish to identify each part, for instance the lengths .................................. |...............| will not be indulged everywhere, for the pure and simple reason that where such lengths appear in an Illustration, their appearance is self evident as to what they show. Also, easily depictable information can quickly become cluttered beyond redemption with the inclusion of just a few extra terms to identify that which is in fact already 'self evident'. So self evident information will not be identified by extra terms or symbology. For instance, in ILLUSTRATION 0, the lineal sum orbital distance between EARTH and VENUS, and 1/2 that sum, are self evident, and so are not noted with busy terms. Illustration 0 pictograms some basic nature of an UPSILON harmonic and allied UPSILON particle state as outlined above beginning with 'WE ARE NOT FINISHED' which can now be changed to 'WE ARE IN NO WAY FINISHED!' Let's start pictogramming over again, re-using Illustration 0, to start a sequence of displayed information, as follows: ILLUSTRATION 1 -------------- 1/2 wave ..... for UPSILON (9460) | Earth | Venus Sun .----*----.------------------------.--*--.------------------------ * A P | A P | | | | | | | .................................. |...............| harmonic = h^/(orbit lineal sum wave/mass) = 9535.25077882 MeV HARMONIC HANDSHAKE 5-1 ------------- 9535.25077882 MeV - negative Pion 134.9764 MeV FIT = 9461.00464359 MeV = 1 S UPSILON low mass (9460.37) AVERAGE + the Electron Radius mass equivalent 70.0252618 MeV = 9531.02990545 MeV + the (charged Pion - negative Pion) mass difference (4.5936) MeV FIT = 9535.62350545 MeV HARMONIC Compare above orbit wave harmonic 9535.25077882 MeV divided by particle mass harmonic 9535.62350545 MeV = 99.99 89185 % in agreement. 1 S UPSILON is the official name for this state in the Particle Data Review Tables of 1994. Elsewhere in this disclosure, the same state is identified as S 1 and the reason for the change is simple, it is easier to visually see the meaning of S 1 then it is seeing 1 S. That's all folks, no other reason. Interesting about this; the above HANDSHAKE 5-1 is not the only way the UPSILON low mass state (9460.37) is seen in lineal sum wave harmonics. There are two other harmonics which can be shown in a similar way, as follows: ILLUSTRATION 2 -------------- moon orbit 1/2 moon Jupiter | Mars | Earth Sun .-------*------.---.------------*---------------*-----,------------ * A P | | | | | 3. | |.............| 1. |..........| | | | |......| | | | 2. |.......| 4. |...................| Four lineal sum solar orbit waves are depicted in Illustration 2. These denote (eccentricity wave/mass) harmonic datas as follows: ILLUSTRATION 2-A linking to the J/PSI particle ---------------- moon 1/2 moon Jupiter | Mars | Earth Sun .-------*-------.--,------------*---------------*-----,------------ * A P | | | | | | 4. |.............| | | | | | = 1322.44749259 MeV | | | | | | | | | 3. |...................| | | | | = 1319.04938308 MeV | | | ......|.......| | | 2. |.......| = 5037.51022864 MeV | | 1. |..........| = 5179.94256805 MeV h^/(Jupiter mean - Jupiter perihelion) + Moon orbit = 5179.94256805 MeV h^/1/2 (Mars mean - Earth mean) = 5037.51022864 MeV h^/(Earth mean) 1/2+ Xion switch = 1319.04938308 MeV h^/(Earth mean - Moon orbit) = 1322.44749259 MeV - Electron 1/2+ Xion negative = 1321.93649353 MeV where: h^ Planks converter constant = 1.9732705332 MeV -11 cm also transforms by Cosmic conversion constant = (1 x 10 to - 27) where: Moon orbit is the Earth Moon's mean of orbit = .oo384401 x 10 to 13 cm and 'switch' is a (negative/neutral) mass midstate --------------------------------------------------------------- Here is what can be shown with the 4 (orbital/wave) mass harmonics shown above in ILLUSTRATIONS 1 and 1-A. --------------------------------------------------------------- The high (4416) and low (3097) MASS states of the J/PSI particle will be calculated to maximum accuracy involving amplitudes of the Electron mass raised by ratio integer factors of the Fine Structure Constant. Actually Electron ratio integer factors are at the heart, raised by powers of the Fine Structure Constant. --------------------------------------------------------------- HANDSHAKE 5-2 ------------- Electron x FSC squared = 9595.98104359 MeV AMPLITUDE - Jupiter (orbit/wave) HARMONIC 1. ... 5179.94256805 MeV = 4416.03847554 MeV = J/PSI high [4415] AVERAGE J/PSI [4415] high ... 4416.03847554 MeV - 1/2+ XION switch = 1319.04938308 MeV = 3096.98909245 MeV = J/PSI low [3096.88] AVERAGE NOTE Earth (orbit/wave) HARMONIC 4 of ILLUSTRATION 1-A is the 1/2+ XION switch which is also in the images of PART 9 called 'The Earth Moon Metaphor For Subatomic Phenomena'. COMPARE particle mass state 3096.88 MeV divided by orbit wave harmonic 3096.87822043 MeV = 99.9999425 % in agreement. HANDSHAKE 5-3 more details ------------- Electron mass = .51099906 MeV Electron mass x FSC squared = 9595.98104359 MeV AMPLITUDE - Electron mass x (2 FSC) ... 140.05052364 MeV = 9455.93051995 = UPSILON [9460) AMPLITUDE - 1/2 (Mars - Earth) (orbit/wave) HARMONIC 2. ... 5037.51022864 MeV = 4418.42029131 - Earth mean - Moon orbit ... 1322.44749259 MeV (orbit/wave) HARMONIC 3. = 3095.97279872 MeV + 2 Electron mass ... = 3096.99479684 MeV J/PSI [3096.88] low AVERAGE COMPARE particle mass state 3096.88 MeV divided by orbit wave harmonic 3096.99479684 MeV = 99.9962932 % in agreement. ! COMPARE orbit wave harmonic from HARMONICS 1 and 4 3096.98909245 MeV from HARMONICS 2 and 3 3096.99479684 MeV ! = 99.9998158 % in agreement. where ! marks where the digits deviate. NOTE ---- from HANDSHAKE 5-1 = 9461.00464359 MeV from HANDSHAKE 5-3 - 9455.93051995 MeV = 5.07412364 MeV - 1 Electron mass ... .51099906 MeV = 4.56312458 MeV which is the PION mass difference ... (4.5936) MeV FIT where: 140.05052364 MeV is termed a 'charged PION's amplitude in that 140.05052364 MeV - Electron mass = 139.53952458 which approximates PION+- ... (139.56995) MeV FIT HANDSHAKE 5-4 ------------- Interval 5179.94256805 MeV (from HARMONIC 1) Interval 5037.51022864 MeV (from HARMONIC 2) do not allude to the 'Bottom Mesons' of masses B+- 5278.7 MeV Bo 5278.9 MeV There are several entities which fall within a range of 5200 to 5500 MeV's between 4416 MeV to 9460 MeV, all being of the bottom (beauty) and bottom (strange) genre, but there seems none with masses that perfectly land on other masses derived by wavelength fracturing and mass factoring. The only other wave/orbit entity which falls anywhere within the range of 4416 MeV to 9460 MeV is in the eccentricity of JUPITER where (Jupiter mean - Jupiter perihelion) has a mass energy equivalent of 5232.7448192 MeV which may seem to connect the 'Bottom Meson' by an ELECTRON power amplitude, factored as 5232.7448192 MeV + 2/3 E x FSC = 46.683508337 MeV = 5279.42832753 MeV - E = Bo meson = 5278.91732847 MeV 5278.9 MeV FIT - 1/3 E = B+- meson = 5278.74699545 MeV 5278.7 MeV FIT SPECULATION A speculation seems possible, that a 1/3 unit of Electron mass may in fact carry a full unit of Electronic charge. That a fraction unit of Electron mass carrying a full unit of charge is indicated throughout this disclosure, but is not a headline feature. ------------------------------------------------------------------ A REASON FOR BELIEVING IN WIDE WIDTH RESONANCES (speculation) ------------------------------------------------------------------ What About Those RHO's ? Let's look at the RHO particle, and see if there is any reason to believe that it should have a wide width mass. What this means is, that instead of one fitted mass, it has a mass amplitude range that expands across at least (say) 21 MeV from (say) 754 MeV to 775 MeV. The thinking comes not from the published Particle data tables of August 1994, which shows no FIT but several AVERAGES which range from 769.9 to 770.8 MeV, but rather from wave factors, which are modelled most perfectly by the planet VENUS in the solar system. The solar model is intriquing and self evident enough that there is little room to doubt that RHO resonances have a width, manifesting through at least three principle wave amplitudes, at least in this model. In fact, once again let us evoke the crescents of Venus in the night sky, and this time wait until there are no crescents. This will be when Venus is on the far side of its orbit from us, on the other side of the Sun, in a 'winter' position relative to us in 'summer'. Behold there is a wavelength, that extends across the terran solar expanse, between Earth and that far distant Venus. In this view it shall be said that Earth is in the 'Summer' position, and Venus is in the 'Winter' position at the other end of the wave, with regard to the total wave which mechanically is a two parter single length, which spans through the Sun. In fact, to complete the model, wait for a few thousand years for the orbit of Venus to precess, until Venus arrives across the Sun from the Earth at Venus' orbit Periheleon position, then wait some more until Venus is in full Venus view in Aphelion of orbit position. There are in view therefore 3 different actual waves, comprising amplitude phases of the two parter solar waves (orbits). Why is this bulge being divulged as some kind of indulgent form of physics? Because it is the bulges, the 3 amplitudes, that hold the model for the wide width resonances of the RHO meson. Here is how, and it is simple. ----------------------------------------------------------------- HOW ABOUT THOSE RHO's the picture ----------------------------------------------------------------- ILLUSTRATION 1 RHO ------------------ IMAGE 1 RHO ----------- Earth Sun Venus .----*----.------------------------- * ----------------------.--*--.----- A P P A h^/(orbit amplitude wave) = RHO MeV . . . . . . . . |........... 775.135809795 ......................| | | . . |............ 772.906160625 ........................| | . . |............. 770.689301670 ..........................| . . . | . * . |......... 767.592951402 MeV ........................| | | * . |.......... 765.406423399 MeV ..........................| | * . |........... 763.232316887 Mev ............................| . | . |....... 760.195477903 MeV ................................| | | |........ 758.050832116 MeV ..................................| | |......... 755.918253135 MeV ....................................| Experiments listing masses as low as [753.5] MeV and as high as [778.] MeV were listed in 1984 data tables. Masses listed were as low as [764.0] Mev to a high of [777.4] MeV, in the 1994 data tables. There is an implicit suggestion revealed by the RHO state facts, that particle Compton wavelengths may have eccentricy, leading to widths that can be used to factor other particle mass states exactly. The intuitive image comes from the reason that the above RHO states are factors directly related to orbit eccentricity involving the symmetry set of 3/2- XION particles (three masses) in which orbital eccentricity is not a factor, whereas Moon orbit incrementation (which mechanically is a local form of width) occurs. These RHO resonances are approx. 1/2 the MeV values of the 3/2+ XION isospin and charge states for 1/2 (Earth + Venus) + and - Moon orbit orbits. And the RHO 765.406423399 MeV state is the wave (Compon) equivalent of the full orbital sum state of (Earth + Venus). The set of RHO's also connect to three other specific mass amplitudes, as follows: ILLUSTRATION 2 RHO ------------------ IMAGE 2 RHO ----------- Earth Sun Venus .--,-*-,--.------------------------- * ----------------------.--*--.----- A P P A . h^/(orbit amplitude waves) = RHO MeV . . . |.................. 770.689301670 ..........................| . . . 1/2 of (h^ of (earth + venus) - moon) = 767.6957576605 * . |.......... 767.592951402 MeV .......................| . . 1/2 of (h^ of (earth + venus) = 765.4064023875 * . |............ 765.406423399 MeV ..........................| . . 1/2 of (h^ of (earth + venus) + moon) = 763.1307034705 * .|............... 763.232316887 Mev ............................| * 5/2 E x FSC - P+ = 763.209153735 5/2 Electron mass, power amplified by the Fine Structure Constant, minus a Proton's mass. P+ = the Proton's MeV. IMAGE 3 RHO ----------- From h^/ (Earth apheilion + Venus perihelion) = 760.195477903 MeV * |....... 760.195477903 MeV ................................| - P+ (change sign) = 178.076832097 MeV - (N^- E), divide by FSC = 1.293780661 MeV when N^ is the Neutron - Proton mass difference = 1.293318 MeV FIT Reverse engineering---- when N^ = 1.293318 MeV (N^ x FSC) = N^ amplitude 177.231111868 MeV - P+ (change sign) 761.041198131 MeV - (N^ - E) = .782318940 MeV = 760.258879196 MeV where N^ - E = 1.293318 MeV - .510999060 MeV = .782318940 MeV --------------- end of RHO's =============== SATURN = PION =============== What is Saturn doing in the Solar System ? Let's go straight to dialogue. For instance, in the case of showing a direct correlation between the space length of the orbit of Saturn, and the Compton wavelength of the fundamental stable Pion particle, it need only be shown that a self evident happy correlation exists, concidering the following details which exclude any co-incidence, or even a magnificent or stunning co-incidence. No, not here, no amazing co-incidence. Stunning imagery is what is here, involving Saturn, and the Pion particle. The facts are that in elementary particles, there are few whose mass energies (MeV's) are found in the mass energy range of the Pion. There is the Muon with 105.6 MeV, the Pion itself with 139.6 MeV, and then a large gap, to the Kaon with a mass energy of 493.4 MeV. Nothing else occurs in this lower meson range. In the solar system there is a large gap between the orbit of Jupiter out to Saturn, Saturn having rouphly twice the orbit of Jupiter. Then Uranus having roughly 4 times the orbit of Jupiter, or twice the orbit of Saturn. In the midst of these wide departures from one data point to the next, in terms of solar orbits, and correspondingly in terms of elementary particle mass energies, there is one DIRECT HIT, this being, that the orbit of Saturn is holy smoke a mirror of the Compton wavelength of the Pion particle. Hey hEy HEY a mistake. It is not a mirror, it is a recurrance. The only proviso is that the solar image of space is a pure ratio of (10 to the power 27) times larger than the wavelengths of elementary particles. Something in the vibratory blueprints of Reality has occurred as a magnificent recurrance of exact kind, between the solor realm, and internal interactive small distances for nuclii and the elementary particles, as viewed through the Compton wavelengths of the particles. BOHR ORBIT MODEL ...... NO! Picture a mighty scene in place, that solor orbits are a blowup into the macro cosmos, of energy principles that behold the behavior of micro cosmic particles. Forget the old Bohr orbit model - the solar system loosely used to model a nature of electrons in shell orbits around a nuclii. Even though the Bohr model is known to be false, it is still good enough to introduce new readers to the topic of atomic, nuclear, and fundamental physics, even though the new reader then immediately proceeds to more correct information once the Bohr model has been intro- duced to get them started. The Bohr solar model has nothing to do whatever with the particle data physics now being married in recurrance partnership between the solar system and fundamental particle mass energy/Compton wavelength states, being disclosed in this paper you are reading for the first time. Hint Hint. What exactly is being modelled, or rather, portrayed, by the solar system is very obscure, at this point. The discloser, (moi) does not know, but suspects some mechanical orbiting of momentums and momentum states may be able to be seen in detail, once some more rooted concepts emerge by thinkers who know their fundamental physics, and can supply reason to mystery, just as did scrutinizing physicists supply eventual reasons to the initial mysteries of the Bohr solar model of the atom. Details are in PIONS IN THE SKY AT SATURN, in PART 11. PART 6 ------------------------------------------------------- HISTORY ------------------------------------------------------------ HISTORY How did a project like this get started? Probably one single co-incidental nature in particle wavelengths started the intrigue which engaged the curiosity to keep pushing into arcane areas until some sense began to gell out of hundreds and thousands of isolated pieces of data. Not one, but several systems of particle mass logics, has currently emerged. The single 'co-incidental nature' fact which started the big 'see' came in 1969 when randomly exploring particle Compton wavelengths to see if any information could be combed by fracturing them into lineal summed parts and looking at the fragments for other hidden masses. The logic was simple enough. Since Compton wavelengths have the nature of mathematical reciprocals contrary to the masses, then for instance, multiplying, say, the ELECTRON mass, by the Fine Structure Constant, then subtracting an ELECTRON mass from the result, and converting the two results to Compton wavelengths it is seen at once that a SMALL wave difference in the Compton wavelengths by itself, converts to a very LARGE equivalent mass. Good enough. But nothing was coming of this. SPOTTING A SOLAR ORBIT Similar explorations of the Compton wavelengths of the PROTON and NEUTRON, and also other entities such as the stable LAMBDA, XIONS and others, took place. Back in those days, an isospin state for a particle was commonly listed in the Data Particle Review Tables. For instance for the stable XION an isospin state was listed, along with splitting to charge states, for instance into negative and neutral masses for the 1/2+ XION mass energies, 2 particles concidered from one. It was noticed that the Compton wavelength for the XION isospin state was very close to in fact you could actually say the same as, the digital value for the orbit of the EARTH. This was just a co-incidence, until a major assumption was made, to treat the orbit of the EARTH as a wavelength, upon which the orbit of the moon was incrementally added and subtracted, and LO and BEHOLD! the two resulting waves corresponded rather well to the XION's split charge mass states seen as their Compton wavelengths. It was immediately found that VENUS had a similar split essence, with the orbit of the moon added and subtracted to VENUS coming up with Compton wavelength values for three ?/2 XION masses but at that time that XION state was not well known, and only that experiments had produced mass/energies which approximated those three 1823 MeV states coming from the VENUS waves, was seen. It was not long after that an exploratory step was taken, to look at the sum of the orbital distance comprising EARTH and VENUS to find that 1/2 the summed orbits of the two planets homed right in onto the masses and charge split range of the better known 3/2+ XIONS. It was the deterministic finding of THREE sets of solar orbital images that had mechanical corresponce to THREE particular XION families which triggered the idea that this could not be just a co-incidence. And the non-coindence was given a name to keep it in mind. The name was: The EARTH MOON Metaphor For Subatomic Phenomena. This name kept hanging around in consciousness for years. Gradually, over the years, some inspiration would occur to force time taken to explore other reaches of Compton wavelength factors in conjunction with further exploration for workable solar models keeping in jump step with changes to the Particle Data Tables and additions of new particles, and new estimated masses to the genre. Plus discrete re-evaluations of the fundamental constants, always ongoing by physicists. And always, particles dropping from tables. The whole project was put on hold in January of 1986, when a number of new insights came about, as a result of more precise definitions of UPSILON mesons which began to appear in the Particle Data Tables. There were numerous areas of confusion and ambiguity in the picture which was already starting to emerge. Mainly, how to determine that solar orbits were involved, seemed to be a major conjectural jumble. The project stayed on hold until middle December of 1994 when the brain which tends to work slowly suddenly realized that the whole of the emerging scheme could be presented entirely in the form of just Compton wavelengths for the particles involved, in which the particle MASSES could then be factored directly by lineal summing mathematics, to extremely high accuracy. The SOLAR orbits would just be models, in this suddenly epiphanated point of view. ERGO the RESULT. It is what now comprises this disclosure. However a change in the slow working brain's perception took place in putting together the final details of this disclosure through latter December of 1994 into the start of the new year. The perception now, is that the solar orbital models are REAL. The perception suggests that a Cosmic blueprint has orchestrated the formation of the solar system into its present patterns, and is synonymous with the patterns which are orchestrating formulas for elementary particles in reaches without, and inside, reaches of inner nuclear space. A mighty inter spacial RECURRANCE is in place, plain to see, out in the open. In this perception, the present day solar GRAVITATIONAL dynamics are the END PRODUCT resulting from the resonances and vibrations which caused the material to come together into its current form in the first place. Random disk accretion cannot be the law. A question stares stark in the face. Which came first, the solar system, or the eggs (particles). Perhaps the question is answered both ways. Taking a starting point, the PROTON is perhaps always there in the empirical realm the same kind of entity all the time. In the entirety of this disclosure the PROTON is just there. It is not derived from anything, nothing has been found to work back first to close in on a PROTON mass values. It is just T H E R E and everything else seems to spring into position around it. The ELECTRON, since its mass is derived from other fundamental constants is not immutable in size or density, but here in the solar system region it has finite shape. Since the mass density of the SUN is something of the order of 10 to the power 11 times more material per unit area of space than fills the PROTON, the solar bodies comprise objects that are more than a trillion times as dense as the vaporous energy called elementary particles. It seems that the super dense presence of a solar system's solid marbles may infer the final images, breached down into the particle realm's resonances. In this kind of thinking, it is possible that elementary particle sizes may actually differ in different solar systems throughout the cosmos. In other words, the sizes are not constants throughout creation. Except perhaps for the PROTON. PART 7 ------------------------------------------------------- CONVENTIONS ------------------------------------------------------------ LET h^ = Planks constant converter (Mev to Wave) (Wave to Mev) = equal (1.9732705332 MeV -11cm) = equals 1973.2705332 (convenient pure digit value) LET E = Electron's rest state mass and/or energy equivalent = .510999065 MeV LET FSC = Fine Structure Constant = 137.0359895 LET P+ = Proton MeV = 938.27231 MeV LET N^ = Neutron - Proton (mass energy difference) = 1.293318 LET Ko = Kaon neutral (497.672) FIT LET K+- = Kaon charged (493.677) FIT Proton masses when subtracted from lesser amounts of mass force a change of sign which is not always included in a string, for simplicity sake. Values reduced by the FSC (Fine Structure Constant) are shown as the reciprocal x 1/FSC since a divide sign is not available in the normal character keys of a typewriter keyboard. Since the whole of this disclosure has been typed for E-MAIL only the lower 128 ascii characters can be used to keep the text compatable with UNIX softwares. SHORT HAND CONVENTIONS Certain short hand conventions have been adopted to eliminate the need for tedious repititious data detailing, in which serious formats used by mathematic scholars are not known by this author, and so, formats have been invented to illustrate factors in a logically availing manner. SYMBOLIC LOGIC A form of invented 'symbolic logic' has been evoked to handle symbology for different physical terms, and a 'philosophy of science' of a unique kind has been invented to handle description of data derivations, mathematical techniques, and pictograms in the form of IMAGES and SCHEMATICS to illustrate results. None of these forms has little, if any, correspondence, to tradition physical or mathematical disclosure modes. See more about the 'logic' under INTRINSIC SYMBOLIC LOGIC in PART 21. FLOATING POINT DECIMALS In the floating decimal point system, used as the only decimal mode for the conventions, all decimal points are exactly as needed, at once showing whether for instance an MEV is, say, .510999065, or 938.27231, and whether a wave is 14.269906899 (Saturn's mean of orbit) or 1.49597927 (Earth's mean of orbit) or .oo384401 (Moon mean of orbit). RESULT OF CONVENTIONS AND SYMBOLIC LOGIC Doing calculations is entirely by the digits entered and resulting. All recourse to exponents (EXP) or systems of units, are completely dispensed with, and only resulting figures in exact digital matchups to Planetary Solar datas, or Particle Data Tables, is required in any calculations. The conventions do the job of keeping track of quantities effortlessly, automatically, without fail. DERIVATION CONVENTIONS Derivations typically assume the following conventions. For example: h^/(orbit) = (x) and (x) - P+ x 3/4 - P+ = particle MeV is incorrectly stated mathematically but follows a direct lineal logic, as follows: For h^, an automatic conversion ratio of (1 x 10 to -27) is assumed, which thus converts magnetudes from Cosmic to Subatomic space, ie. orbit (wave) to wavelength (Compton). Thus h^ can assume (1973.2705332 x (1 x 10 to -27)). ILLUSTRATIVE LOGIC AND SO h^/(orbit) = (x) and (x) - P+ x 3/4 - P+ = particle logically interprets as follows: Planks conversion divided by an orbit (wave) = (x1) a number (x1) x (1 x to 10 -27) = (x2) an MeV (x2) MeV, minus the Proton mass = (x3) (x3) divided by 4, then multiplied by 3 = (x4) (x4) minus the Proton mass = (x5) (change sign is assumed) (x5) a resulting particle's known mass energy MeV, calculated to high accuracy typically. To clarify the use of the illustrative logic, here is the same mathematical derivation, expressed in a more standard mathematical manner, using an actual example: (1/2 Earth + Venus) orbits, converted to subatomic wave (Compton) value, then converted to Mev, to which is subtracted the Proton mass, the result reduced by 3/4, then subtracted from the Proton mass, to yield a stable charged (KAON +-) mass energy, using the illustrative logical sequence, as follows, : h^/(orbit) - P+ x 3/4 - P+ = particle MeV EQ. 1 NOTE Specifically the above statement EQ. 1 is exactly as entered into a solid state calculator, step by step, to produce a result. CALCULATOR CONVENTIONS THUS WHEN 1.289034473 h^/(1/2 earth + venus) minus Proton divide by 3 times 4 minus Proton (change sign) - 1/3 electron = Kaon +- MeV DIGITALLY (1973.2705332 / 1.289034473) - 938.27231 x 3/4 - 938.27231 (sign) = 493.866906703 - 1/3 E = 493.6965573682 CHARGED KAON +- = 493.677 FIT WHERE divide (1973.2705332 / 1.289034473) = 3/2+ Xion 1530.81284772 MeV 1530.81284772 - 938.27231 = 592.540537729 MeV 592.540537729 x 3/4 = 440.405403296 MeV 440.405403296 - 938.27231 = - 493.866906703 MeV change sign = 493.866906703 MeV (Kaon +-) - .170333021 = 493.696573681 MeV (Kaon +-) IMPLICIT CALCULATOR LOGIC Therefore the implicit CALCULATOR logic in the statement: h^/(orbit) - P+ x 3/4 - P+ - 1/3 E = particle EQ. 2 is self evident, when any such statement is illustrated in the facts, as executed by a simple calculator device which does not require extra programming to add, subtract, multiply, and divide. The straight in, data entry steps, of EQ. 2 are the mathematical equation per se, also called 'strings'. This convention, IMPLICIT CALCULATOR LOGIC, supercedes the need for any evoked 'formal' approach to the mathematics needed to unfold the inclosed calculations and disclosures. In many ways, IMPLICIT CALCULATOR LOGIC is similar to the programming syntax used as protocals by the now abandoned programming regime known as APL in wide spread use in the early 80's for doing math on mainframe computers. In that regime, at least in some uses of it, terms were entered in a strict lineal fashion one step to the next to proceed from beginning to end in factoring a mathematical statement. Changing the sign, and reciprocating a result along the way, were the norm. I watched some work done by an APL programmer in which statements within statements were lineally entered first, as if unravelling an equation from the inside out. Sad to say, however, that one or two hours could be spend programming one step in APL, with, say, 35 steps more to go, while the whole string of 36 steps could be done in less than a minute on a calculator of non programable kind. - R.S.L. author That (APL), and the current IMPLICIT CALCULATOR LOGIC used to tackle equations for this disclosure, are a far cry from programmable computer logics, or computerized mathematics, in which algorythms are first written out by hand to figure out how to program in the statements for handling each individual kind of equation and each equation variant. The difficultly is that hundreds of different variants of an equation might be needed to hunt down an insight in a single spurt of intuition, and pre-programming is just simply impossible for insight floods coming in at a rate of 1/10th of a second per glimpse. The only way is to go the route of rote, handling each insight one at a time by hand in spurts of fast data entries using nothing but digits, since all proofs in physics are by balanced digits. Within the scales of balanced systems of units, the balanced digits are always the proof for the bottom line of empirical descriptions. IMPLICIT CALCULATOR LOGIC equations are as straight line lineal input/output as they can possibly be made to be, in this disclosure. It can also be called 'Calculator convention logic'. 'Calculator convention logic' will be frequently used in most of the following data disclosures, beginning next below in PART 8. Thus is explained away the whole of the missing maths; the boolean logics, the tensor whoola boolas, the gauge messages, the algebraic derivatives, the calculus, the logrythms, the statistical analysis, all vanished and replaced by D I G I T S linked together by coded strings of pure and simple logic. TEXT CONVENTIONS One difficulty (no matter what convention is used for data represention), is the lack of physical space on a page sized ordinary text screen in an IBM compatable computer, to depict much data on a single line. For this reason, some statements are in two (or more) lines, and sometimes more than one display has to be used to illustrate all insights for a particular derivation or factoring of data(s). Note that all of the datas and forms are typed in the normal characters of a standard typewriter keyboard so that the file itself can be routinely transmitted as E-MAIL in the 128 character set of Unix, via InterNet or netware equivalent systems in the information SuperHighway. ILLUSTRATIVE CONVENTIONS In fact, most of the datas being disclosed will be illustrated in several different ways to get at all of the insights intended. A standard illustrative form is typically shown in TABLE 5 where a number of data terms in a symmetrical group are tabled. Another typical form is IMAGE 1 UPSILON, in which waves are depicted along a base line symbolically representing the length of the waves. Attempts to illustrate to scale are meaningless due to large lineal wave distances between modelled entities. In IMAGE 1 UPSILON solar orbits are depicted along a base line extending in one direction from the Sun, and so mechanically these are radii of orbits. In ILLUSTRATION 1 RHO, solar orbits are depicted extending in orbital diameters crossing the width of orbits, with the Sun in the middle, a different mechanical nature in that in this image, orbits are implied as being somehow relevant to some point of center, rather than some point at one end of a wave, with an orbital radius originating from the Sun. This difference may or may not be an intrinsic property in the nature of particle waves (Compton), but it certainly does help for the moment the picturing in the mind's eye, of wave linkups which occur extending from one entity position on one side of the Sun all the way across space to another entity position on the other side of the Sun, in which not one but two distinctly different entities, and also specified entity eccentricity positions, in the solar system are noted. Thus orbits are termed 'Summer' and 'Winter' positions when reference is made relative to the adding of two orbits, and this is mechanically empirically correct by looking at the distances between two planets, one on one side of the Sun, and the other planet on the other side of the Sun in model imaging. Ergo, 'Summer', and 'Winter', planet positions. Similar modelling can be used perfectly correctly to model lineal summed factors of particle waves (Compton) with an invisible data point as a point of center that substitutes for the Sun. In which case a particle's wave Compton) thus modelled should seem to be intrinsically twice the size of a normal Compton wavelength from the (bar h) value of Planks contant, (yielding a diameter equivalent value for that particle's Compton wavelength), since a diameter seems to be illustrated. But this is not necessarily the case in particle wave structures, since many of the modelled waves (Compton) appear to be single total lengths, comprising the lineal sums of two (or more) separate other radius waves. The possibility, of course, in an idle moment of speculation, is that a particle's wave (Compton) is in fact a construct of two waves momentarily joined to comprise one temporary length. However, a conjoined nature of waves is not instantly seen in any of the models portrayed in this disclosure. This disclosure treats all particle waves (Compton) as single devices unique to each particle, even though the single device may in fact be a collage of two (or more) waves. FOR EXAMPLE The particle wave (Compton) for 3/2- XION (2244) state is a collage of four single orbit radius waves, when modelled as solar orbital equivalents. Specifically, the following solar collage has four waves (orbits) lineally summed to yield: 1 2 3 4 h^/ ((Venus - (1/2 earth + Venus)) + Moon) = 2244.93222 MeV = 3/2- XION [2244] which is an experiment's value in the 3/2- XION (2250) state of Status **. 'SLIDE RULE' RECURRANT RESONANCE CONVENTION In all orbital references, it is taken for granted that the same symmetries, or data results, can be obtained by the direct factoring of particle wave equivalents (Compton), without tagging a solar orbit as causal. Casual tagging of solar orbits as direct manifestations of equivalent particle waves (Compton) is an assumed recurrant symmetry principle in the fundamental scheme of Cosmic Reality, in this disclosure. In such a recurrent scheme, one realm (subatomic for instance) is not a mirror of the other (reciprocal) but rather a resonance recurrance (slide rule), in which only the magnetude of the scale factor differs, as if the two arms of a slide rule have been slid along the edges of two long rulers extending the length (diameter) of the solar system, and at the start, marked in details clearly seen to Compton wavelength exactitudes in the order of (10 to the minus 14 cm). In actual fact, the smaller realm (sub-atomic) uniformly expands (as if in red shift) by a magnetude of 1 x 10 to 27, to become solar and 'Cosmic'. Slide Rule Symmetry then comes into the picture comparing sizes of the two realms to note the numerous similarities. - end of CONVENTIONS - PART 8 ------------------------------------------------------- RELEVANT SIDECARS ------------------------------------------------------------ ============================================================ POWER AMPLITUDES of the ELECTRON mass energy equivalent by the Fine Structure Constant ============================================================ This covers many key parts, whose entity terms and data values are detailed in full under FACTORS OF THE ELECTRON in PART 12. Here is a list of 'whole integer ratios' factors of the ELECTRON actully used in this disclosure in amplifications by the Fine Structure Constant. 1 E raised by x FSC 3/2 E raised by x FSC 2 E raised by x FSC 5/2 E raised by x FSC and E x FSC squared when the Fine Structure Constant = 137.0359895 and E = .510999065 1/3 E These factors of the 2/3 E Electron are commonplace. and 4/3 E These are assumed to be 5/3 E E + 1/3 E, and E + 2/3 E. 1/2 E By itself, also turns up. The ELECTRON is covered in more detail under FACTORS OF THE ELECTRON in PART 12. -------------------------------- THE PROTON IS JUST SITTING THERE -------------------------------- The PROTON seems to have no direct derivable state. The PROTON occurs in numerous + - (plus minus) situations, with something derived ADDED to the PROTON, or SUBTRACTED from the PROTON, or two Protons summed on either side of an entity, but no naked PROTON by itself. Some PROTON situations are combined + - factors. For instance several KAON states shown in PART 11 under 'The KAON box of Fluctuating Wavelengths' feature the proton locked in + - situations, which can be schematically illustrated as thus: *------------------------- 1/2+ SIGMA MeV | | difference is a non particle state mass unit | | + Proton --------------------------- | - Proton | | difference is a non particle state mass unit | *-----change sign--------- KAONS + - o MeV in which the 'non particle state' masses, of the order of 439 MeV to 444 MeV, are themselves whole integer multiple constructs of SU(3) symmetry mass energy units, as also shown within the SYMMETRY FACTORS of PART 10. ----------------------------------------- BEHOLD THE BOLD ELECTRON ----------------------------------------- On the other hand, the ELECTRON turns up in derivations all over the place. Notwithstanding that the ELECTRON mass energy itself can be calculated by fundamental constants by just knowing the Bohr Orbit of the Hydrogen Atom, or even, for that matter, just knowing the energy equivalent of the 1st spectrum line in the Hydrogen Atom, from either of these empirically measurable values, the ELECTRON mass itself is calculated directly as amplitude expansions of the above two mentioned physical constants as whole Integer multiples, and whole Integer powers, of the Fine Structure Constant. In reverse engineering, using 'Amplified Electron Resonances' gained by derivations involving interactive particle wave (Compton) components, the Elecron mass can be repeated, generated by incorporating the particle wave Compton) components into an 'Amplified electron resonances' structure, to hence gain many different estimates of an Electron rest mass energy. The 'Amplified Electron Resonances' are detailed under FACTORS OF THE ELECRON found scattered throughout PART 12. In this view, the Electron, and electron mass ratios of (plus\minus) + - 1/3 E and 2/3 E and a few 1/2 E variables are common. 4/3 E variables are also commonplace, and these are concidered simply as 1 Electron + 1/3 Electron mass. 1/2 Electron mass variables are not concidered a disturbing violation, since it may not be Electron mass per se involved, but momentums, having exact Electron mass equivalents, in which case a 1/2 mass electron equivalent can be gained in Physical Constants by direct amplitude enhancements stemming from the Bohr Orbit cross sectional DIAMETER, diminished by the Fine Structure Constant, and converted from wave to energy equivalent. 1/2 units of the Electron mass can also come directly from the Electron's rest state binding energy in the Hydrogen atom, which is less than the Electron's rest state mass energy by (2 x (FSC squared)), where, then, the Electron binding energy x FSC squared is 1/2 the Electron's rest state mass energy and may in fact be in similar, a precise unit of momentum. PART 9 ------------------------------------------------------- THE EARTH/MOON METAPHOR FOR SUBATOMIC PHENOMENA ------------------------------------------------------------ This intense grouping, involving just the Earth and Venus Planet Orbits, ultimately gives all of the particles of the Su(3) Octuplet and Su(3) Decuplet groupings, including both stable and unstable particles, with three sets of XION particles, including both charge states (- and o isospins) for each of the 3 Xion sets. SYMMETRY FACTORS in PART 10, covers the territory further. Other particle mass energies are also mechanically deducible from: The Earth/Moon Metaphor For Subatomic Phenomena. ------------------------------------------------------------ TABLE 1-METAPHOR Lineal summed wavelengths showing unitary expansion rates. ------------------------------------------------------------ PLANET ORBITS XION PARTICLE KNOWN STATUS (Compton Wavelengths) Charge Sets masses --------------------- ----------- ------ ------ minus 1 electron = 1315.15 MeV (1315.2) **** + | MOON Xion o 1315.66 MeV | EARTH ---|-- 1/2+ Xion 1319.04 MeV | - | MOON Xion - 1322.44 MeV minus 1 electron = 1321.93 MeV (1321.87) **** - - - - - - - - - - 1/2 + | MOON Xion o 1526.26 MeV | EARTH + VENUS ---|-- 3/2 + Xion 1530.81 MeV (1530) **** | - | MOON Xion - 1535.39 MeV - - - - - - - - - - + | MOON Xion o 1817.11 MeV | VENUS ---|-- 3/2- Xion 1823.57 MeV (1823) *** | - | MOON Xion - 1830.07 MeV ------------------------------------------------------------ TABLE 5-METAPHOR In more detail, with an extra extension to another Xion. ------------------------------------------------------------ PLANET ORBITS XION PARTICLE KNOWN STATUS Compton Wavelengths) Charge Sets masses ------------------- ------------- ------ ------ Su(3) octuplet minus 1 electron = 1315.14 900093 MeV [1315.2] **** + | MOON Xion o 1315.66 869213 MeV | EARTH ---|-- 1/2+ Xion 1319.04 938310 MeV | - | MOON Xion - 1322.44 749261 MeV minus 1 electron = 1321.93 649355 MeV [1321.87] **** - - - - - - - - - - - Su(3) decuplet 1/2 + | MOON Xion o 1526.26 140694 MeV (1527) | EARTH + VENUS ---|-- 3/1+ Xion 1530.81 284775 MeV [1530] **** | - | MOON Xion - 1535.39 151532 MeV (1535.0) - - - - - - - - - - + | MOON Xion o 1817.11 881384 MeV (1817) | VENUS ---|-- 3/2- Xion 1823.57 393770 MeV [1823] *** | - | MOON Xion - 1830.07 508736 MeV (1830) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Predicting a XION mass. This 4th set of numbers does not contain symmetry factors. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Suggested extension. PREDICTING A XION MASS ====================== VENUS + | MOON Xion o 2244.93 227809 (2244) MINUS | (EARTH, MINUS ---|-- Jp ?? Xion 2254.79 298023 [2250] ** 1/2 | EARTH + VENUS) - | MOON Xion - 2264.74 068837 | |-------> a predicted particle ? DERIVATION IS AS FOLLOWS ------------------------ where ----- venus venus earth venus ((((1.082089677 - (((1.082089677 - ((1/2 (1.49597927 + 1.082089677)))) moon - .oo384401))) = G LET --- VENUS - (1/2 EARTH + VENUS) = F = .206944796 x 10 to 13 cm (VENUS - F) - moon = G (1.082089677 - .206944796) - .oo384401 = .871300870 x 10 to 13 cm AND .871300870 IS THE h^ COMPTON WAVE EQUIVALENT FOR 2264.74 068837 MeV - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - predicted Negative particle for ?/? XION [2250] ** There is another major collidiscope involving (particle/planet) interaction via (wave/orbit) harmonics to calculate particle masses. This major 'collidiscope' involves EARTH - VENUS resonances to leap straight up into the heavy mass UPSILON including its highest ranges. It is a very large window, with incredible mechanical and predictable properties and is handled below under its own section, titled 'It's UP to the UPSILON'. The main gist of the EARTH MOON METAPHOR is; dancing between planets Earth and Venus to produce a set of 3 different XION family charged particle states, plus, for instance, a direct connection to Upsilon mesons. The situation can be easily summarized by an image of the solar system, as follow: ------------------- EARTH/MOON IMAGE 1 ------------------- SUMMER POSITION WINTER POSITION 1/2 Earth | Venus SUN Venus .---*---.-----------------------.---*---.----------*--------.---*---. + - | + - | - + moon moon | moon moon | moon moon | | | | ............ - charge 3/2- XIONS | ................ isospin state wave/orbits | .................... o splits | - ................................ 3/2+ XIONS isospin .................................... wave/orbits o ........................................ - ............................................ i ................................................ 1/2+ XIONS o .................................................... wave/orbits NOTICE that in terms of a LABORATORY point of view the + - character of the moon orbit (wave/orbit) increments changes to - + characters at the WINTER position for Venus, in the characteristic (wave/orbit) lineal sums for the 3/2+ XION particle. ------------------- EARTH/MOON IMAGE 2 Hook Link MAIN FRAME ------------------- SUMMER POSITION WINTER POSITION 1/2 Earth | Venus SUN Venus .---*---.-----------------------.---*---.----------*--------.---*---. + - | + - - + moon moon | moon moon moon moon | | | ...........| - charge 3/2- XIONS | ..... HOOKS ...| isospin state wave/orbits | ...................| o splits - |..............................| 3/2+ XIONS isospin |........... LINKS ................| wave/orbits o |......................................| - ...........................................| i .............. MAIN FRAME ....................| 1/2+ XIONS o ...................................................| wave/orbits EARTH SUN - end of basic EARTH/MOON METAPHOR intro - Details of XION particles in the EARTH MOON METAPHOR start further below at IMAGE 1 EARTH-MOON under MORE. Still to follow are These RHO's have resonance MORE Pi in the sky Yin Yang Amplitudes The super highway of PARTICLES A mass for the NEUTRINO Virtual Reality Its UP to the UPSILONS Poof! the CONNECTORS ---------------------- The J/PSI interlinks Summary statements --------------------------------------------------------------- CONTINUED The EARTH/MOON Metaphor for Subatomic Phenomena --------------------------------------------------------------- ILLUSTRATION 1 XION's ---------------------- In which are depicted orbits and equivalents (charge/masses) (Earth) + moon = 1/2+ XION - charge (Earth) (1319) = 1/2+ XION * (isospin) (Earth) - moon = 1/2+ XION o neutral [1/2 (Earth + Venus) + moon = 3/2+ XION - charge [1/2 (Earth + Venus) [1530] FIT = 3/2+ XION * (isospin) [1/2 (Earth + Venus) - moon = 3/2+ XION o neutral (Venus) + moon = 3/2- XION - charge (Venus) [1830] FIT = 3/2- XION * (isospin) (Venus) - moon = 3/2- XION o neutral where 'isospins' are a connector, and not the average of the two charge masses, since the massed differences between each state in a set are non lineal, but are lineal in their equivalent (Compton) wavelengths, and can thus be modelled by exact solar orbits. IMAGE 1 XION's --------------- Earth 1/2 Venus .----*----.-------------.----*----.--------------.----*----. ..... to sun + moon - moon + moon - moon + moon - moon |------------------|-------------------------................... |-----------------------|-------------------------................... |----------------------------|-------------------------................... --------------------- The 1981 datas showed conciderable real touching in solar orbit wave/mass harmonics, but the revised 1994 solar astronomy datas show very little, compared to before. And so a bit of reverse engineering has been done upon the 1981 solar datas, to home in on planet orbit values, that stick together nice and tight in correspondence with elementary particle stuff. The figited solar datas can be concidered as pure wavelength (Compton) states for the particles, with suprising correspondence to solar datas, but from the point of figiting it, let's concider the particle wave lineal summing to be entirely within the realms of Compton wavelengths, with the solor correspondences used as models to show the way pointing to what to look for. ---------------------- These figures are in the ballpark. All that is needed is for fielders to run around a bit to catch the balloons of energy. ---------------------- In power amplifications, 1/2 factors of the Electron mass are used. Append this to say; On the other hand, it seems more to the point to assume that 'whole integer ratios' of the FSC (Fine Structure Constant) are not intrinsic and fundamental, rather, 1/2 units of Electron mass equivalent, are intrinsical factors. Here is a list of 'whole integer ratios' factors of the ELECTRON actully used in this disclosure in amplifications of the Fine Structure Constant as prior noted further above. 1 E raised by x FSC 3/2 E raised by x FSC 2 E raised by x FSC 5/2 E raised by x FSC and E x FSC squared when the Fine Structure Constant = 137.0359895 and E = .510999065 =================================== THESE RHO'S HAVE RESONANCE =================================== These RHO (mass/wave) resonances are interesting. In particular two particular amplitude waves have revealing modelling images with other reasons attached. The amplitude waves are shown here in ILLUSTRATION 3 and are taken from ILLUSTRATION 1 of PART 5. ILLUSTRATION 3 -------------- SUMMER WINTER Earth SUN Venus .----*----.------------------------- * ----------------------.--*--.----- A P P A h^/(orbit amplitude wave) = RHO MeV | | | |........... 763.232316887 Mev ............................| | | |....... 760.195477903 MeV ................................| Earth aphelion to Venus Perihelion, and Earth mean to Venus aphelion, are imaged. Here is what is so interesting about these: Both of these RHO (wave/mass) quantities interact with the PROTON. And each (wave/mass) individually reacts with other fundamental quantities, as follows: HANDSHAKE 1 ----------- RHO (mass/wave) resonance 763.232316887 Mev - the PROTON change sign = 175.039993113 Mev which is a good approximation of 5/2 the Electron mass x FSC where FSC is the Fine Structure Constant. This is not an idle inclusion since integer ratios of the Electron power amplified by the FSC are included in other derivations that will be shown later. HANDSHAKE 2 ----------- RHO (mass/wave) resonance = 760.195477903 MeV + 2 ELECTRON = 761.217476023 Mev - the PROTON change sign = 177.054833977 Mev + the PROTON = 1115.32714397 Mev + 2/3 E = 1115.6678100 Mev = 1/2+ LAMBDA IN THE SAME VIBRATION --------------------- RHO (mass/wave) resonance = 760.195477903 MeV + 2 ELECTRON = 761.217476023 Mev - the PROTON change sign = 177.054833977 Mev + 1/3 ELECTRON = 177.225166998 Mev x 1/FSC = 1.2932746181 Mev = N^ = Neutron MeV - Proton MeV. ------------------------ | ----------------------- PROTON MeV | diff | N^ power amplitude | ------------------------ RHO MeV ------------------------ | ----------------------- PROTON MeV | diff | RHO MeV | ------------------------ N^ power amplitude x 1/FSC = N^ (Neutron - Proton) mass difference all of which has come from one single (wave/orbit) h^/(Earth apehlion + Venus perihelion) = RHO MeV = 760.195477903 MeV = a cosmic orbit particle vibration and, an amplitude wave. OH HO TURF SURFING ASTROLOGY TYPES HAVE JUST SPOTTED VENUS ! ========================================================== Venus is turning out to be a nice lovely planet. It mentions a lot of things to say about understructures. Here is another, v e r r y interesting handshake. HANDSHAKE 3 ----------- From here on the PROTON will be identified by the symbol P+ representing the PROTON = 938.27231 MeV. h^/(Venus mean) - P+ divide by 5 = 177.060325534 MeV | + 1/3 E = 177.230658551 MeV | x 1/FSC = | 1.293314692 MeV | = N^ = | 1.293318 MeV FIT when N^ = Neutron - Proton AND ALSO h^/(Venus mean) - P+ divide by 5 = 177.060325534 MeV | diff = | 1.291024771 MeV | h^/(Venus mean + Moon) - P+ divide by 5 = 175.769300762 MeV where N^ is the (Neutron - Proton) mass difference such that (PROTON + 1.291024771 MeV) = 939.563334771 MeV approx = the NEUTRON = 939.56563 MeV FIT AND WHERE h^/(Venus mean) - P+ divide by 5 = 177.060325534 MeV + 1/3 E divide by FSC = 1.293314692 MeV PROTON + P+ = 939.565624692 MeV ------------------- NEUTRON 939.56563 MeV FIT derived accuracy = 99.999999 4 % LAMBDA mass claim ------------------ Deriving the stable LAMBDA once again another way: 177.060325534 Mev PROTON is + 938.27231 MeV = 1115.33263553 MeV + 2/3 E = 1115.67330157 Mev --------------- 99.999 5788 % 1/2+ LAMBDA 1115.678 MeV EXPMT ------------------------- 1/2+ LAMBDA MeV | ---------------------- PROTON MeV | ------------------------- Venus (wave/mass) where (h^/(Venus mean) - P+) / 5 = 177.060325534 MeV NOTE 1/2+ LAMBDA (1115.33263553 Mev) / (1115.32714397 Mev) = 99.999 5076 % where 1115.32714397 Mev is from HANDSHAKE 2. If precision is needed, then either LAMBDA mass claim increased by 2/3 E results in 1115.32714397 MeV + 2/3 E = 1115.66781001 MeV 1115.33263553 Mev + 2/3 E = 1115.67330157 MeV percent of accuracy --------------- 99.999 0410 % 1/2+ LAMBDA FIT 1115.684 MeV It means a 1/2+ LAMBDA stable particle's mass has just been calculated to high accuracy by two methods entirely different, to close in on a similar result. 1. From an (EARTH aphelion + VENUS perihelion) Cosmic virbration, in HANDSHAKE 2. = 1115.67330157 MeV 2. From a (VENUS mean) Cosmic vibration, in HANDSHAKE 3 = 1115.66781001 MeV HANDSHAKE 4 ----------- WINTER 1/2 wave SUMMER | Mars | SUN Earth .----*----.------------------------- * ----------------------.--*--.----- A P | P A | |..........................................................| |.......................| = 1045.33350825 Mev WHERE 1045.33350825 Mev - PROTON = 107.061198257 MeV AND 107.061198257 MeV divided by FSC = .781263364 MeV + ELECTRON = 1.292262429 MeV = N^ WHERE N^ is the (Neutron - Proton) mass difference SUCH THAT (PROTON + 1.292262429 MeV) = 939.564572429 MeV NEUTRON = (939.56563) MeV FIT Here is introduced the first exploratory probe of small and ultra small terms which seem to fill niches and chinks in these esteems of creation. N^ from HANDSHAKE 3 = 1.291024771 MeV diff = 1/3 E x 1/FSC approx. N^ from HANDSHAKE 4 = 1.292262429 MeV where small diff = .oo1237658 MeV x 1/FSC = .169603688 MeV approx. 1/3 E = .170333021 MeV REMARK All of the above factors in the four 'HANDSHAKES' were factored in terms of wave harmonics and wave amplitudes, modelled entirely upon solar mechanical orbital images as data sources. It does not mean that all four are correct, but guess that one at least is correct. Here is the same set of resonance interactions, this time, the factors use just the fundamental Physical Constants and elementary particle datas, as the source inputs. HANDSHAKE 5 ----------- The LAMBDA mass is PRECISELY calculated to complete agreement with the FIT mass, and the best registered experiments, as follows: Deriving the stable LAMBDA once again another way: where P+ is the PROTON = 938.27231 MeV FIT where E is the ELECTRON = .510999065 MeV FIT where N^ is the NEUTRON-PROTON mass difference = 1.293318 MeV FIT =================== Then N^ x FSC = 177.231111868 Mev + P+ = 1115.50342186 Mev + 1/3 E = 1115.67375488 MeV --------------- 1/2+ LAMBDA 1115.678 MeV EXPMT 1/2+ LAMBDA 1115.684 MeV FIT In terms of Cosmic tie-in the LAMBDA value = 1115.67375488 calculated immediately above from Fundamental Constants is the same as the LAMBDA claim = 1115.67330157 calculated above in HANDSHAKE 3 as Cosmic Resonances toned in the ECCENTRICITY of EARTH and VENUS orbits. Here is the accuracy between the two realms of creation. 1115.67375488 MeV --------------- 99.9999 593 % 1115.67330157 MeV 1/10,000th of a percent error. ================================================================= MORE EARTH/MOON METAPHOR FOR SUBATOMIC PHENOMENA ================================================================= ------------------- IMAGE 1 EARTH-MOON ------------------- where P+ = 938.27231 MeV Proton where N^ = 1.293318 MeV Neutron-Proton mass difference where E = .510999060 MeV Electron and harmonic mass ratios between states are introduced THEN WITNESS ------------ set 1 =============================================== 1/2+ XION - = (1321. 32) MeV FIT ---------- - moon + 1/3 E - N^ = 1321. 32450761 h^/(Earth) ---------- + moon - 4/3 E = 1314. 98736002 1/2+ XION o = (1314. 9) MeV FIT =============================================== set 2 =============================================== 1/2+ XION - = (1321. 32) MeV FIT = 1321. 35233732 VE- x 6/4 x 3/7 + P+ + E - N^ ---------------------- - moon 1535.39151529 - P+ = VE- h^/1/2 (Earth + Venus) ---------------------- + moon 1526.26140691 - P+ = VE+ VE+ x 6/4 x 3/7 + P+ - N^ = 1314. 9798287 1/2+ XION o = (1314. 9) MeV FIT =============================================== set 3 =============================================== 1/2+ XION - = (1321. 32) MeV FIT = 1321. 32516539 V- x 3/7 + P+ + 5/3 E ----------- - moon 1830.07508733 - P+ = V- h^/(Venus) ----------- + moon 1817.11881381 - P+ = V+ V+ x 3/7 + P+ = 1314. 92081163 1/2+ XION o = (1314. 9) MeV FIT =============================================== 1/2+ XION - Set 1 1321. 32450761 2 1321. 35233732 3 1321. 32516539 1/2+ XION o Set 1 1314. 98736002 2 1314. 9798287 3 1314. 92081163 NOTE a slight declination in derived masses, can be clearly seen walking the town from SET 1 through SET 3. This is either the way it is, or the masses should be perfect. In not being perfect it may mean one or another of the input datas is slightly out of whack. Attempts to arrive at perfect results has not been successful. All attempts resulted in DRIFTS and FLUCTUATIIONS in other datas derived by working backwards in reverse engineering to discretely modify the planetary orbit input terms. No luck. Alas. A suggestion is that XIONS cascading from one particle decay may in fact discretely vary from XIONS popping out of another collision forming a different original high energy particle. This can have image if waves (compton) are components of different kinds in different collisions, with the seeming same resulting XION popping out like an Imp on stage, bearing in mind that the Imp started out in different waving wire locations before teleporting into the particle detector's start 'branch' point, when different originating particles hook the decays which produce XIONS. --------------------------------------- Pi IN THE SKY --------------------------------------- The following has been noticed. ------------------- IMAGE 2 EARTH-MOON ------------------- circumpherence where E2Pi = 3.210701785 MeV Electron x 2Pi NOTE where Pi = 3.141592653 Ratio of a circle * if E is a radius vector then the circumpherence = 2 Pi R NOTE IF E MeV is represented as the vector of a radius, THEN E x 2Pi is represented as the circumpherence of a circle of radius E MeV, AND E x 1Pi can be concidered a semi circle circumpherence respecting that in terms of wavelengths the Electron Compton wavelength is the circumpherence of a circle, and it, reduced by 2Pi, is the circle's radius. Thus physical lineal measures are the components. That is, expanding the ELECTRON mass energy equivalent by 2Pi, is equivalent to reducing the ELECTRON Compton wavelength from a circumpherence to a circle's radius. This is kinky, in that the h^ constant already in use is an assumed radius quantity. Dogs, you gotta love them: lick their balls, lick your face, lick their balls, lick your face. Let sleeping dogs lie in meditating on the 'kink'. Maybe GOD has the answer. set 4 =============================================== + 4/3 E + E x 1Pi = 1321.33606607 MeV ---------- h^/(Earth) .................... = 1319.04938308 MeV ---------- - 5/3 E - E x 2Pi = 1314.98701616 MeV =============================================== set 5 =============================================== ---------------------- h^/1/2 (Earth + Venus) ........ seemingly no E 2Pi operators ---------------------- =============================================== set 6 =============================================== 1/2+ XION - = (1321. 32) MeV FIT V* + E + E x 2Pi = 1321. 40899416 ----------- h^/(Venus) ..... 1823.57393767 - P+ = V* = 1317. 68729328 MeV ----------- V* + E - E x 2Pi = 1314. 98759053 1/2+ XION o = (1314. 9) MeV FIT =============================================== I can't remember how V* was actually derived - RSL. Set 4 1314. 98701616 MeV ratio of perfection ---------------- 99.9999 563 % Set 6 1314. 98759053 MeV ------- COMMENT ------- Two different derivations are the same MeV. Set 1 is wave/orbit evolved. Set 4 is circle geometry evolved. set 1 ---------- h^/(Earth) ---------- + moon - 4/3 E = 1314. 98736002 MeV 1 / 99.9999 738 % -------------------- - 5/3 E - E x 2Pi = 1314.98701616 MeV ---------- circle h^/(Earth) ---------- set 4 Another pair of derivations are the same in terms of proportionate accuracy. Set 1 is Earth wave/orbit evolved. Set 6 has circle geometry Venus evolved. set 1 ---------- h^/(Earth) ---------- + moon - 4/3 E = 1314. 98736002 MeV 99.9999 824 % -------------------- circle = 1314. 98759053 MeV V* + E - E x 2Pi ---------- h^/(Venus) ............ - P+ = V* ---------- set 6 ==================================== THE YIN YANG AMPLITUDES ==================================== -------------------- IMAGE 3 EARTH-MOON -------------------- set 7 =============================================== The TRAFFIC LIGHTS which switch lanes of logic. The N^ vrs 5/2 E order is reversed when working through the Proton. - P+ x 2 - P+ change sign =============================================== where E+^ = E + (N^ divide by FSC squared) where E+^ = .511067935 MeV where E = .510999065 MeV where N^ = 1.2933318 MeV = (Neutron-Proton) mass difference YIN ---------- h^/(Earth) 1.495980753 ---------- = 175.098675075 MeV - P+ x 2 - P+ change sign - 2/3 E+^ - N^ = 5/2 E+^ x FSC - P+ x 2 - P+ change sign + E = N^ x FSC ---------- = 177.231111868 MeV h^/(Earth) 1.495980375 ---------- YANG NOTE the E and E+^ are different. E = .510999065 MeV E+^ = .511067935 MeV WHERE E+^ = E + (N^ x 1/FSC squared). YANG power resonance is perfect. In reverse engineering, (running the Set 7 Yang equation backwards starting with N^ x FSC), the resulting value for the EARTH mean of orbit is 1.495980375 x 10 to 13 cm Uncanny accuracy ------------- 1.495980753 = 99.9999 747 % ! YIN power resonance is perfect. WHEN E+^ = E + (N^ divided by FSC squared) THEN Earth orbit 1.49597927 x 10 to 13 cm. Astounding accuracy ------------- 1.495980375 = 99.9999 261 % ! set 8 =============================================== Here is the digit way of looking at the behavior of the TRAFFIC LIGHTS in the form of a YIN YANG algorythm. ===== AGAIN let's see your cards ===== ==================== YIN ---------- h^/(Earth) 1.495980753 = 1319.04897464 ---------- 380.775764644 761.551529282 175.086750759 MeV 176.720780717 176.380068759 - P+ x 2 - P+ change sign - 2/3 E+^ - N^ = 5/2 E+^ x FSC NOTE this factors as an E of + N^ divided by FSC squared === the Neutrino! - P+ x 2 - P+ change sign + E = N^ x FSC 176.720112803 177.231111868 761.552197196 1.293318 MeV 380.776098598 ---------- h^/(Earth) 1.495980375 = 1319.04840859 ---------- YANG set 9 reverse engineering =============================================== Here is the other way of looking at the behavior of the TRAFFIC LIGHTS in the form of a YIN YANG algorythm. YIN ---------- h^/(Earth) ---------- 5/2 E+^ x FSC + 2/3 E+^ + N^ - P+ change sign, divide by 2 175.086750759 2/3 x .511067935 176.720780717 380.775764641 + P+ = EARTH MeV 1319.04807464 EARTH ORBIT = h^/ 1319.04807464 1.495980 753 x 10 to 13 cm el matcherino 1.49597927 ========== 1.495980 375 x 10 to 13 cm EARTH ORBIT = h^/ 1319.04840859 1319.04840859 + P+ = EARTH MeV 177.2311111868 .510999065 = 176.720112803 380.776098598 N^ x FSC - E - P+ change sign, divide by 2 ---------- h^/(Earth) ---------- YANG ==================================================== The accuracy of these two amplitudes is self evident ==================================================== As you can see. - end of YIN YANG amplitudes - ------------------------------------------------------- THE super highway OF PARTICLES ------------------------------------------------------- Are you ready to hit the high lanes, the super heavy ball bearings that arise when Venus and Earth get hit with comets and oscillate? Even though SET 5 had no (E x 2pi) split levels, there are higher levels to be had in abundance through the Electron itself in power amplifications by the Fine Structure Constant, which takes the picture up in to the high meson mass and wavelength ranges of the UPSILON, where precise imaged mechanics featuring E x 2Pi units of mass, and + - lineal sum increments of the Moon orbit upon the distance between Earth and Venus, spell out a near perfect picture of a great Cosmic song singing about S O M E T H I N G going on. The song is recorded below under ITS UP TO THE UPSILONS. ================================================== A mass for the NEUTRINO ? ================================================== A reason for thinking of a NEUTRINO mass is that TWO targets become precise direct hits when the 'NEUTRINO' mass is added to to the mass of the ELECTRON. The 'NEUTRINO' mass in question, is N^ the Neutron-Proton mass difference, divided by the Fine Structure Constant squared to give +^ = .oooo68870 MeV. This produces a mass energy unit, which is roughly 5 times that of the binding energy of the ELECTRON, which itself is the Fine Structure Squared as a reduction onto 1/2 the ELECTRON. In other words, the ELECTRON can be concidered a power amplification of the ELECTRON's own unit of binding energy. Binding energy means the energy equivalent needed to hold an ELECTRON in its rest state position in the Hydrogen atom, and called the Rydberg Energy as a Physical Constant by physicists. When the 'NEUTRINO' energy (in MeV's) is added to the mass of the ELECTRON, the following occurs: LET +^ = the 'NEUTRINO' mass. AND +^ = N^ divided by FSC squared WHEN N^ is the (Neutron-Proton) mass difference. THEN E + +^ = E+^ And so PERFECT 'NEUTRINO' EXAMPLE 1 ------------------------------ neutrino is here P+ + [1/2 ((( P+ - (((E+^ x 5/2) x FSC)) + 2/3 E + N^ ))))] P+ + [1/2 ((( P+ - (((5/2 x E+^) x FSC)) + 2/3 E + N^ ))))] is the h^ wavelength for orbit 1.4959 80753 x 10 to 13 cm ---------------- Earth orbit 1.4959 7927 x 10 to 13 cm accuracy ratio = 99.9999 008 % shown otherwise in: The YIN YANG Amplitudes. PERFECT 'NEUTRINO' EXAMPLE 2 ---------------------------- neutrino is here A. h^/(Earth) - P+ x 2 - P+ sign + 2/3 E+^ = E^ = 177.058875789 MeV B. h^/(Venus) - P+ divide by 5 = E^ = 177.060325534 MeV C. N^ x FSC - 1/3 E = E^ = 177.060778846 MeV D. FSC x 5/2 E+^ + E + 1/3 E + N^ neutrino = E^ = 177.061354932 MeV is here FOR EXAMPLE string D run without the Electron augmented by the Neutrino, yeilds = E^ = 177.0 37806351 which is on its own, it does not match anything, so that the use of E+^ in this string is DEFINATIVE. WHEREAS string A (derived from Earth orbit) run without the Electron augmented by the Neutrino, yields = E^ = 177.0588 29875 which is hardly changed from the original string, so thus the use of E+^ is AMBIGUOUS. ANOTHER LOOK AT A NEUTRINO -------------------------- It is possible that N^ - E rather than N^ itself is the holder of Neutrino substance. In which case N^ - E N^ ------ will be less than ----- FSC squared FSC squared by a factor of E understanding that this term ----- FSC squared for E is an MeV equivalent associated with the electron binding energy of the Atom = E -------- 2 FSC squared ================================================== Cooking the books ================================================== It does seem like adding a tiny integer unit to the mass of the ELECTRON to make things copisetic with an already existing digital number such as numbers that express the distance of the EARTH to the SUN in centimeter units, is 'hacking' a little bit too lustily. However, there is the fact that the YANG derivation is perfect anyway, without hack. Secondly the hacked YIN term gains some extra dimensions in perspective with the hack included, the hack being the additive factor of N^ divided by the Fine Structure Constant squared to produce an energy quotient suggested as a candidate for a 'NEUTRINO' mass +^ if there is one. The 'hack' creates a perfect equality between the entity known as N^ times the FSC, and ELECTRON times 5/2 times the FSC, in that it manufactures the N^ entirely from the ELECTRON binding energy if equations are to be believed. Here is the manufacture: LET Eb = the Electron Binding Energy. = .oooo136056981 MeV THEN 2 Eb x FSC squared = ELECTRON rest mass E = .510999065 MeV AND 5/2 E x FSC + 5/3 E = 175.914821372 MeV OOPS there is no way to tie 175.914821372 MeV to N^ x FSC since the difference between the two MeV's happens not to be N^ but 1.316290495 MeV, instead of 1.293318 MeV. Let us produce a 'NEUTRINO' mass, a form of Neutron-Proton binding energy spin glue within, and raise it in power by the FSC squared. The 'NEUTRINO' mass energy will have to be +^ in the order of = .oooo68870 MeV = +^ to be of an any use, since it happens to be N^, when raised in power by the FSC squared. When this 'NEUTRINO' is added to E to yield E+^ and the 'manufacture' is run again, then Here is the manufacture again: LET Eb = the Electron Binding Energy. = .oooo136056981 MeV THEN 2 Eb x FSC squared = ELECTRON rest mass E = .510999065 MeV AND E + +^ = .511067935 MeV = E+^ THEN 5/2 E+^ x FSC + 5/3 E+^ = 175.938530653 MeV + 1.293318 MeV for N^ = 177.231848653 MeV divide by x FSC = 1.2933 23376 MeV and redo the proceedure several times, until N^ converges to a constant value = 1.2933 23416 MeV compared to the empirical (physically measured) N^ = 1.2933 18 MeV This 'Neutrino' caused change is good enough agreement for having cooked the books. It is an agreement that is 4 significant digits better than the 'oops' value above = 1.316290495 MeV. The Cooked Books N^ Version ---------------------- REMORMALIZING When the 'manufacture again' is run anew, substituting the new value 1.2933 23376 as N^ , by repeating the run, N^ very quickly settles into a values = 1.293323416 MeV. IMPLICATION ----------- What is implied is that an exact 'NEUTRINO' operator of the Binding Energy of the Neutron (N^) is also in the Binding Energy of the LAMBDA (N^ x FSC + 1/3 E) and in direct consequence via lineal summing of wave * (Compton) factors also in the mass energy constructs of other very massive particles. A rather complete self contained package of particle parts is at hand. * Spelled out in UPSILON QUESTION 1 under VIRTUAL REALITY next topic below. Here is how the 'NEUTRINO' ... Neutron Binding Energy co-relates to the LAMBDA Binding Energy, and amplified power bubble of the ELECTRON energy. The operators are switched in mid stride by a 1/3 unit of ELECTRON mass. When N+^ = 1.2933 234161 MeV N^* x FSC = 177.231854969 MeV N^* + 1/3 E+^ = L^ = 177.402210047 MeV L^ + P+ = LAMBDA = 1115.67452004 MeV when N+^ = 1.293323416 MeV as determined under 'manufacture again' above. trace switch N+^ x FSC = N*^ = 177.231854069 MeV with Neutrino N*^ - 5/3 E+^ - N+^ = 175.086750760 MeV divided by FSC = 1.277669839 MeV divided by 5/2 = .511067935 MeV = E+^ = .511067935 MeV ---------- 1 .511067935 MeV compare ------------ 100 % 2 .511067935 MeV when 2 = E+^ = .511067935 MeV = E + N^ divided by FSC squared. =================== The PERFECT Neutron =================== Wait a minute ! Hold the phone ! Something just went whizzing by in the calculator. It looks like tautalogicals to me, says the slow drawling spokesperson. Looks worsn' that, says the one who speaks a bit faster. Looks like none of those, says the person who wrote it (moi), due to the fact that both the IMPLICATION and that under 'manufacture again', come from two entirely independent fundamental Physical Constant sources. At the very least, number 1.293323416 is a direct derivation of the numbers for the E mass and the FSC and may have nothing to do with the (Neutron-Proton) mass difference = N^, since either terms E or E+^ can be used to derive a N^ value, by the steps in RENORMALIZING, immediately above. It seems that something is amiss in physics in the realm of the NEUTRON. Until memory is jogged, to remember what happened under the original 'Here is the manufacture'. Then to finish it off: LET Eb = the Electron Binding Energy. = .oooo136056981 MeV THEN 2 Eb x FSC squared = ELECTRON rest mass E = .510999065 MeV AND 5/2 E x FSC + 5/3 E = 175.914821372 MeV AND SINCE N^ x FSC = 177.231111868 = 1.293318 MeV x FSC DIFFERENCE ..... 177.231111868 - 175.914821372 = 1.316290495 MeV clearly this is NOT the real N^. WHEREAS neutrino is here when E+^ is substituted for E in the above equations, DIFFERENCE ....... 177.231854069 - 175.938530653 N^ = 1.293323416 MeV clearly this may be a real N^ in that P+ + N^ = 939.565633416 MeV --------------- 99.999999 6 % NEUTRON 939.56563 MeV FIT more or less 100 % exact. Hmmm, says the slow speaking drawler, don't be too hasty, could be a tautalogy, yu know. - end of A MASS FOR THE NEUTRINO - ================================================== THESE PARTICLES HAVE PERSUATION ================================================== Subtopics include: IONNIC GRAPPLES IONNIC ALGEBRA IONNIC WAVELENGTHS Enough info has been gathered together under A MASS FOR THE NEUTRINO - to hook together several things into one locked-in constancy. In this, a minutely adjusted PROTON mass and same for NEUTRON results. These results are shown here just for the sake of show, the minutely adjusted masses are not used elsewhere, so if deemed to be significant or even fundamental by speaker at any speed, let that speaker do the final homework to integrate the show into other parts and pieces of a larger big picture. Much of the 'Persuasion' picture is tautological, in other words results can be expected to be due to simple math and not to fundamental understructure, or to many distinct and intricate fundamental parameters coming together. SPECULATION It gets interesting when hidden terms are revealed by opening up certain equations. It may be timely to the suggestion that these 'hidden' terms are in some ways like 'guage' fields, which some researchers now think may be hidden undetected behind the scenes in certain particle interactions. Certainly fractured wavelength bits and pieces knitted together comprise a large big picture hidden in the background of a single mass, if the wavelength field is not included in the overview. HERE IS A 'MINI' PICTURE This MINI picture includes something else not used elsewhere; simple algebra to derive certain terms; and a description that is copisetically given with all parts together; both energies, and wavelengths (Compton). Lets start with 'IONNIC GRAPPLES'. =============== IONNIC GRAPPLES =============== The Picture is simple. Let 'SOURCE' terms be: LET N^ = 1.293323416 MeV from 'The Cooked Books' above in A MASS FOR THE NEUTRINO. LET E = .510999065 MeV LET E+^ = .511067936 MeV from 'The Cooked Books' above in A MASS FOR THE NEUTRINO. except the N^ term used to create E+^ is 1.293323416 so that E + 1.293323416 x 1/FSC squared = .511067936 MeV The 'IONNIC GRAPPLES' are: GRAPPLES 1 *-----------------------------> = 177.2318541569 MeV | + N^ + 5/3 E+^ | E+^ x 5/2 x FSC = 175.0865085870 | | *---------> N^ x FSC = 177.2318541569 MeV ---- diff is obvious = E+^ x FSC = 70.034700343 MeV *---------> N^ - E+^ x FSC = 107.1971538257 MeV | | | E+^ x 3/2 x FSC = 105.0520505152 | + N^ + 5/3 E+^ *-----------------------------> = 107.1971538257 MeV These 7 pieces of data are locked together in constancy when the source terms have values stated as E+^ and N^ in the 'SOURCE' terms as shown immediately above. The strings are loose if N^ is NOT exactly 1.293323416 MeV. WHEN THE STRINGS ARE LOOSE: a re-normalizing attempt to close in on a constant value for N^ is UNsuccessful because there are two different intrinsic terms, both of which change in the re-normalizing, the rate of change of one term being much smaller than for the other's rate of change, which causes things to gradually unwind when attempting to re-normalize, for instance as follows: LET N^ = 1.29332341 3 MeV (slightly altered DOWN) ^ *------------------------------ = 177.23185 4165 <--* not | | the | 5/2 E+^ x FSC + N^ + 5/3 E+^ | same | | | THEN N^ x FSC = 177.23185 3644 <--* | | THEN N^ - E+^, x FSC = 107.19715 3300 <--* | | | 3/2 E+^ x FSC + N^ + 5/3 E+^ | not | | the *------------------------------ = 107.19715 3821 <--* same LET N^ = 1.29332341 9 MeV (slightly altered UP) *------------------------------ = 177.23185 4171 | change | 5/2 E+^ x FSC + N^ + 5/3 E+^ is fast | | | THEN N^ x FSC = 177.23185 4466 <-----* | | THEN N^ - E+^, x FSC = 107.19715 4122 | change | 3/2 E+^ x FSC + N^ + 5/3 E+^ is slow | | *------------------------------ = 107.19715 3827 <-----* WHEN N^ = 1.29332341 6 MeV (original GRAPPLES 1) there is no drift nor flutter the GRAPPLE is locked tight. ============== IONNIC ALGEBRA ============== The IONNIC GRAPPLES picture broadens to include the PROTON and NEUTRON masses as follows; when it is learned that: N^ x FSC + 2/3 E+^ ( x 2Pi) approximates a LAMBDA mass N^ x FSC + 2/3 E+^ ( x (2Pi - 1)) approximates a PROTON mass WHERE P+ x 1/( x (2Pi - 1)) approximates (N^ x FSC) + 2/3 E+^ SUCH THAT N^n = (P+ x 1/( x (2Pi - 1))) - 2/3 E+^ = 1.293494055 MeV WHICH APPROXIMATES N^ + (E+^ x 2Pi) x 1/FSC squared. However, the string is loose. A re-normalizing attempt to close in on a constant value for N^n is also not successful. The PROTON mass is an X factor, it is an arbitrary input, which effects any attempt to do a re-normalization to close in on a constant value for N^n, for instance as follows: BEGIN N^n = 1.2934940 55 MeV EQ. 3 x FSC + 2/3 E+^ x 2Pi - P+ - 2/3 E+^ = 1.2934940 53 Mev = N^n AGAIN EQ.3 = 1.2934940 47 MeV AGAIN EQ.3 = 1.2934940 07 MeV. As you can see, N^n will keep drifting further out of focus. The solution is to do a reverse engineering, starting with N^ and deriving a value for P+ (the PROTON). AND SO LET Pi = 3.141592653 LET N^ = 1.293323416 MeV N^ + (E x 2Pi x 1/FSC squared) = N^n = 1.293494390 MeV SO THEN N^n x FSC + 2/3 E x 2Pi + 1115.868261914 MeV approximates LAMBDA - N^n x FSC + 2/3 E x 2Pi = 938.27231 2191 MeV fits the PROTON SO THUS, substituting in EQ.3, BEGIN N^n = 1.293494390 MeV EQ.3 x FSC + 2/3 E x 2Pi - P+ - 2/3 E = 1.293494390 Mev = N^n AGAIN EQ.3 = 1.293494390 MeV = N^n AGAIN EQ.3 = 1.293494390 MeV. = N^n IT IS OBVIOUS that the N^n ain't gonna budge. I see two items worth peering at says the slow speaking drawler : 1 The E value of the ELECTRON has been used for increments, and NOT the E+^ value. 2 The resulting PROTON mass is entirely within the experimental FIT of [938.27231] MeV FIT. I see something else, says the one who speaks a little faster: P+ + N^n = 939.56580658 MeV = No^ = mass for the NEUTRON but it is too high, by an amount equal to, hmmm, looks good for it being E x 2Pi divided by the Fine Structure Constant squared. You gotta tautology, there, fella, says the slow speaking drawler. If you subtract E x 2Pi x 1/FSC squared you'll get No = 939.56535606 MeV exactly the same as adding N^ to P+ when N^ = 1.293323416 MeV and P+ = 938.27231219 MeV except, an I gotta givyah points, they're all locked together as constants. I see what you mean, says the one who speaks a little faster. Question is, how much is tautology, and how much is fundamental physics? Gotta nother question, says the slow speaking drawler, just cooked it up in the mainframe: if N^ x FSC + 1/3 E + P+ = 1115.67452222 it differs from our FIT value by [1115.684] MeV FIT - 1115.67452222 = .009477775 which looks galldarn like N^ x 1/FSC so if I append N^ x 1/FSC to the end of 1115.67452222 I get 1115.68 396009 which is gooda' nuf for LAMBDA [1115.684] MeV FIT and so using this LAMBDA everything FITS tightern' a drum, the drawl getting noticably slower keeping in lock step with GRAPPLES getting faster in the antics of the mathematic's algebra. =================== MORE IONNIC ALGEBRA =================== WHICH BRINGS US BACK TO FIRST CAUSE - THE ALGEBRA LET Pi = 3.141592653 LET P+ = 938.27231219 MeV as derived in IONNIC GRAPPLES THEN P+ divide by 2Pi - 1 = 177.595949723 - 2/3 E = 177.255283679 = L^+ divide by FSC = 1.293494390 and 177.595949723 divide by FSC = 1.295980350 = N^+ where 1.295980350 - 1.293494390 = 2/3 E divide by FSC So FAR so GOOD. 1.295980350 x 2Pi = 1115.86826191 LAMBDA^ (high) - P+ = 177.595949723 In ALGEBRA, it happens that 1.295980350 x (((2Pi - 1) x FSC)) + 1) = 939.568292541 NEUTRON (high) and NEUTRON (high) - P+ = 1.295980350 which is back where we started. The point is, that in wavelengths the stuff factored under IONNIC ALGEBRA becomes the factors of simple circles. ================== IONNIC WAVELENGTHS ================== Let's first convert some mass to wave energy: LET any wavelength be 10 to -14 cm. h^/ 1115.86826191 = 1.768372307 LAMBDA^ wavelength h^/ 938.27231219 = 2.103089377 PROTON wavelength h^/ 939.568292541 = 2.100188510 NEUTRON wavelength h^/ 177.595949723 = 11.111010900 L^+ wavelength h^/ 1.295980350 = 1522.60837305 N^+ wavelength Since wavelengths are reciprocals to energy, they work in converse order to ALGEBRA which factors mass. And so there is: LAMBDA^ wavelength x 2Pi = L^+ wavelength 1.768372307 x 2Pi = 11.111010900 and 11.111010900 x 1/2Pi - 1 = 2.103089377 PROTON wavelength etc. The point is that in the geometry of a circle, when LAMBDA^ wavelength is a radius L^+ wavelength is the circle's circumpherence. where LAMBDA^ radius is inside the bounds of a PROTON or within the measure of a PROTON's wavelength, while the L^+ circumpherence comprises a circle within a shell that comprises a PROTON property (not the Proton radius). Wish I could d r a w geometry on a typewriter, says the speaker with a drawl, should make it a lot easier to see at once. Don't know, says the one who speaks a little faster, looks like a tautology to me. You speak with too much haste, says the one who speaks fastest of all. - end of THESE PARTICLES HAVE PERSUASION - ================================================== VIRTUAL REALITY ================================================== The E^ value derived immediately above as 177.061354932 MeV * is interesting in its own right, because it has causality that branches out into the Cosmos as well as infiltrating sub atomic resonance and decay structures. * As D in PERFECT 'NEUTRINO' EXAMPLE 2 when N^ was 1.293318 MeV Here is a summary of four COSMIC/SUBATOMIC recurrences: When N^ = 1.293323416 MeV When E^ = N^ x FSC - 1/3 E+^ = E^ = 177.061498090 MeV 1. h^/(Earth) - P+ - 1/3 E+^ x 2 - P+ change sign = E^ = 177.058806918 MeV | diff | approximate | 1/2 E x 1/FSC | 2. h^/(Venus) - P+ divide by 5 | | = E^ = 177.060325534 MeV | diff | approximate | 1/3 E x 1/FSC | 3. N^ x FSC - 1/3 E+^ | = E^ = 177.061498090 MeV 4. FSC x 5/2 E+^ + E + 1/3 E + N^ = E^ = 177.061498189 MeV ------------------- the rugga bugga is 177.061498090 MeV well, the percentage of error doesn't show up in the calculator the error is so small 99.9999999 % For instance, if the E^ value of string 4 is worked backwards to an E^ value for string 1, by subtracting from E^ of string 4, first, 1/3 E+^ x 1/FSC, then 1/2 E+^ x 1/FSC; the result reverse engineers back to a value of the Earth's orbit: 1.49597 8994 x 10 to 13 cm. If E instead of E+^ is used, the reverse engineering yeilds and Earth orbit value of: 1.495979 033 x 10 to 13 cm. -------------- 1.495979 27 x 10 to 13 cm. The rugga bugga = 99.99999 841 % Either way, this is close tracking between Cosmic realms. Bearing in mind that if the Big Bang portion of the cosmology seen by telescope is taken out of the picture, the remaining picture is still the complete self contained view possible by seeing everything in terms of Compton wavelengths, all lineal sums and fractured into pieces linked. - end of VIRTUAL REALITY - ====================== ITS UP TO THE UPSILONS ====================== UPSILON orbital angular momentum states are pin pointed. ---------------- IMAGE 1 UPSILON Jupiter's Eccentricity ---------------- aphelion JUPITER perihelion to SUN *---------------------*----------------.----*----.-------- // ------ - moon moon + *.....................|..........................| *.....................|.....................| *.....................|................| | 3 Fundamental UPSILON (orbit/waves) occur. These three (orbit/waves) involve the eccentricy factor of JUPITER, which is the orbital distance between JUPITER, and its aphelion or perihelion of orbit. The eccentricity factor is MODIFIED by plus or minus increments equal to the orbit of the EARTH's moon. In terms of fundamental waves (Compton) they associate directly with higher mass UPSILON mesons, in a self evident pattern. The whole picture ties together the exact MASSES of UPSILSON states 1S 2S 3S 4S. THE BIG PICTURE BEGINS AS FOLLOWS --------------------------------- Let J^ = JUPITER eccentricity factor = .37710047 x 10 to 13 cm = JUPITER mean - JUPITER aphelion Converted to particle wave (Compton) mass energy equivalents there is found: h^/ (1/2 J^) - MOON = 10573.2692632 MeV let h^/ 1/2 J^ eccentricity = 10465.4896238 MeV h^/ (1/2 J^) + MOON = 10359.8813611 MeV which are UPSILON DATA 1 -------------- h^/ (1/2 J^) - MOON = 10573.2692632 MeV = UPSILON 4 S (10580.0) MeV h^/ 1/2 J^ = 10465.4896238 MeV (10355.3) MeV h^/ (1/2 J^) + MOON = 10359.8813611 MeV = UPSILON 3 S In particle physics experiments NO particle masses of any other kind have shown up within the range of these two UPSILON S states derived from JUPITER. UPSILON DATA 2 -------------- The other two UPSILON S states are: 4 S = (10580.0) MeV = 10573.2692632 MeV (from J^ - moon) 3 S = (10355.3) MeV = 10359.8813611 MeV (from J^ + moon) 2 S = (10023.30) MeV derived below 1 S = (9460.37) MeV derived below UPSILON DATA 3 -------------- In the spread of mass potential between the four S states tabled in UPSILON DATA 2 are several other mass states that tie directly in to the BIG picture. FROM J^ - MOON 4 S ====== 10573.269 MeV | | | | | | | | +|- diff = 107.779 MeV (approx N^ - E x FSC) = 107.205 MeV | | | | | | | | | | | |---- * ------ 10465.48962 MeV (from h^/ J^ = (orbit/wave) | | | | | | | | | | | +|- diff = 105.604 MeV (approx 3/2 E x FSC) = 105.037 MeV | | | | 3 S | |=====|==|==== 3 S = 10359.881 MeV | | | | FROM J^ + MOON | | | | | | | +|- diff = 763.904 MeV = RHO range - P+ - P+ = LAMBDA | | | | range | +|- |-----|-- diff = 549.969 MeV = ETA range | | | | | | +|- ----- diff = 442.189 MeV = KAON range | | | | 2 S |===|=====|====|===== 2 S = (10023.30) MeV | | | | | +|- diff = 562.930 Mev - P+ - P+ = 1313.616 | | | 1/2+ XION range | | | | |----|--- * ---- 9595.981 MeV = (E x FSC squared) | | | | | | | | +|- diff = 135.611 MeV PION range | | | +|- diff = 1115.684 MeV = 1/2+ LAMBDA FIT (1115.684) MeV | | | | | | 1 S |====|============== 1 S = (9460.37) MeV | |-------------------------------------------- = 9457.585 MeV It is clear that many fundamental particle mass approximations are induced within the wide arms of the UPSILON S states when two of the states are derived from the eccentricity factor of JUPITER. These approximations (ranges) include PION XION KAON N^ - E x FSC ETA 3/2 E x FSC RHO LAMBDA "If you think this looks good wait'l yuh getta loada the next page" ! UPSILON DATA 4 Next Page -------------- In UPSILON DATA 3 a clear anomaly is the citing of a full 1/2+ LAMBDA FIT mass, rather than an approximation only to UPSILON 1 S state 9460.37 MeV. The reason for this extact mass citing for the LAMBDA is mighty. It involves a PRECISE calculating of specific KEY mass integer units, plus a slightly revised (lowered) term used for the EARTH moon's orbit in the JUPITER eccentricity interactions. The result of just TWO minor adjustements is an ARENA that becomes tightly locked together, all parts are exact fits. The main adjustment, was to use the assumed 'NEUTRINO' mass as a + increment to the rest state mass of the ELECTRON, and then use the 'adjusted' ELECTRON mass for all following derivations. The other minor adjustement was in deducing a slightly lowered term for the orbit of the EARTH'S moon. For an assumed 'NEUTRINO' mass, see elsewhere wherever the word NEUTRINO is cited in this disclosure. To save you the trouble, here it is anyway: N^ x 1/FSC squared = .oooo68870 MeV which is the assumed 'NEUTRINO' mass when N^ = 1.293318 MeV FIT. Several routes were followed, in which an ajustment was assumed and strings (with the adjustment) were run foward then backwards through the calculator to result in other adjustments which were also 're-normalized' so to speak by running the strings backward and forward again, redoing the calculations in different ways. Very quickly in fact almost at once, in less than a half an hour a whole NEW PICTURE stablized into a self evident view, involving UPSILON S state masses. In other words it is not feasible to point to a starting place and saying, 'here is a single insight that started the road to discovery'. What you SEE is what you've GOT, is what counts. How you got there doesn't matter. The NEW PICTURE takes up a great deal of line space in text. Therefore the energy/frequency/waves of the plateau's demonstrated, have to be parsed (broken up) into several smaller pictures. In the NEW PICTURE the exact MASS entities calculated fall into place merely by the adjustments, in the main using an adjusted ELECTRON increased by the 'NEUTRINO' mass energy increment, which is N^ divided by the FSC squared. This means the resulting datas fell out onto the table top, in the open, one after the other as a direct consequence. The use of tweezers and a bag of marbles to shape concepts did not occur. What a satisfying half hour! This is why it took less than an hour to produce the stuff, finished. Let's begin over again. UPSILON QUESTION 1 ------------------ The first step to the NEW PICTURE rundown began as follows: Question: An intuitive assumption. What EARTH moon orbit would be needed to have calculated S 3 and S 4 UPSILON mass states, using J^ orbital eccentricity for JUPITER, if the two calculated states were separated in an exact split by energy entities N^ - E x FSC and 3/2 E x FSC so that - MOON = S 4 UPSILON 10572.6954732 MeV + 107.205849362 MeV = N^ - E x FSC h^/ 1/2 J^ = 10465.489238 eccentricity MeV - 105.050313380 MeV approx 3/2 E x FSC + MOON = S 3 UPSILON 10360.4393104 MeV By working backward: using 107.205849362 MeV = N^ - E x FSC for 1.293318 MeV Determining the - MOON factor for S 4 UPSILON was calculated first, resulting in a MOON orbit term of .oo3823633 x 10 to 13 cm which was substituted in h^/ (1/2 J^) + moon to yield the S 3 UPSILON state. The ELECTRON mass increment difference of 105.050313380 MeV approximating 3/2 E x FSC via 10465.4896238 eccentricity MeV - S 3 UPSILON 10360.4393104 MeV becomes .... hey what gives ! turns out to be an ELECTRON value of .511059485 MeV which was increased over the rest state ELECTRON mass of .510999065 MeV by just .oooo60419 MeV, which was an approximation of the ELECTRON mass plus (2E divided by the FSC). When an ((ELECTRON plus 2E divided by FSC)) adjustment was tried, things did not hold together, there was some subtle flutter and drift when running calculations back and forth. Bits and pieces of tiny spurious digital matter kept poking out. On a hunch, the 'NEUTRINO' mass was instead tried as an ELECTRON adjustment. It was the bonanza, the mother load. The first time tried all of the equations (strings) locked up tight into CONSTANTS ! The adjusted ELECTRON mass using a NEUTRINO increment, worked. The result was an almost negligable change to a derived Earth MOON orbit for use with JUPITER, to calculate UPSILON masses. The new EARTH moon orbit found itself to be .oo3823697 x 10 to 13 cm. compared to .oo384401 the official original. Thus, the stage is set. Everything is ready. Let the show begin. Let EARTH moon orbit = .oo3823697 x 10 to 13 cm. Let adjusted ELECTRON mass = .511067935 MeV = E+^ = E + (N^ x (1/FSC sguared)) and (N^ x (1/FSC sguared)) = NEUTRINO = .oooo68870 MeV And so, here is the LOCKED in higharchy for UPSILONS. starting with: UPSILON STATEMENT 1 ------------------- Homing in on characters results in a nice bright NEUTRINO ! .oo3823697 - MOON = S 4 UPSILON 10572.6938963 MeV + 107.204272480 MeV = N^ - E+^ x FSC h^/ 1/2 J^ = 10465.489238 MeV - 105.052050450 MeV = 3/2 E+^ x FSC + MOON = S 3 UPSILON 10360.4375734 MeV .oo3823697 where E+^ holds a NEUTRINO. Let's not get ridiculous here. This is not being waved as a proof of NEUTRINO mass. The plus N^ x 1/FSC squared unit is termed 'NEUTRINO' for bookkeeping purposes, giving the entity a name. It just seems this particular entity kind of fits the bill for a candidate for a possible mass for an ELECTRON neutrino. Particularly since it is lurking right in the middle of N^, in the factor of N^ - E = n^ .782318935 MeV. It is roughly 5 times the ELECTRON's binding energy = .oooo136056981 MeV. UPSILON STATEMENT 2 ------------------- 5/2 E+^ x FSC = 175.086750759 MeV and P+ - 175.086750759 MeV = RHO range = 763.185559240 MeV so that S 3 UPSILON state 10360.4375734 MeV - 763.185559240 MeV = 9597.25201416 MeV x 1/FSC squared = .511066740 MeV ------------ 99.9997661 % E+^ .511067935 MeV bearing in mind that the percentage of accuracy is by factors held together by large magnitudes of intrinsic inherent differences, due to power amplitude ratios involving the FSC squared thus some digital trunkation is allowed ... ... a gift from Mr. Fudge who got the gift from Mrs. Brownie. UPSILON STATEMENT 3 Two NEUTRINOS ------------------- Peering more closely to the definition of UPSILON STATEMENT 2 it is seen that S 3 UPSILON state 10360.4375734 MeV - E+^ x FSC squared 9597.27445548 MeV = 763.163117920 MeV RHO range - P+ change sign = 175.109192080 MeV and 175.109192080 MeV is 5/2 x FSC the value of an ELECTRON mass equivalent of .511133440 MeV which looks like an ELECTRON rest mass .510999065 MeV plus TWO units of N^ x (1/FSC squared). In other words, working from E+^ x FSC squared to yield a RHO range mass, the factor which hooks to the PROTON, is a power amplification of a rest state ELECTON, plus 2 NEUTRINO's. Well, that took some trouble to explain, but fortunately it is done. UPSILON STATEMENT 4 The ELECTRON's binding energy ------------------- The terms spelled out in UPSILON STATEMENT 3 can be called CONSTANTS, since they behave as such. The CONSTANTS remain consistent when the field of view is broadened to take a sharper more detailed look into some of the understructures implicit in the JUPITER / UPSILON Cosmic oscillation. Using the E+^ value of the ELECTRON as a constant term, several other new derivatives can be easily shown. Three different views are examined as follows: UPSILON CONSTANT 1 Deriving the ELECTRON ------------------ BEGIN: Let state 3 4 UPSILON = 10572.6938963 MeV from h^/ Jupiter eccentricity - MOON adjusted .oo3823697 x 10 to 13 cm then S 4 UPSILON 10572.6938963 MeV - 1115.50342186 = P+ + N^ x FSC N^ = 1.293318 MeV = 9457.19047444 MeV + PION (139.56995) MeV FIT = 9596.76042444 MeV divide by FSC squared = .511040563 MeV minus which approximates E+^ - 2 Eb electron binding energy .oooo27211 when E = .510999065 MeV = .511067741 MeV .511067741 Percent of accuracy ------------ 99.9999 684 % .511067935 UPSILON CONSTANT 2 Deriving the S 4 UPSILON STATE ------------------ IN REVERSE ENGINEERING: LET E+^ = .511067935 MeV = E + (N^ x 1/FSC squared) the NEUTRINO LET E-^ = .oooo27215 MeV = E+^ divide be FSC squared = 2 x E+^ binding energy factor LET Eo = .511040720 MeV = E+^ - E-^ THEN Eo x FSC squared = 9596.76338755 MeV - PION + - (139.56995) MeV FIT = 9457.19343755 MeV + 1115.50342186 = P+ + (N^ x FSC) when N^ = 1.293318 MeV FIT = 10572.6968594 MeV --------------- 1 / 99.9999 719 % 10572.6938963 MeV S 4 UPSILON UPSILON CONSTANT 3 Derive the LAMBDA cohort ------------------ IN CONVERSE ENGINEERING BEGIN Let 10572.6938963 MeV = S 4 UPSILON state And let E-^ x FSC squared = 9596.76338755 MeV - (139.56995) MeV FIT charged PION + - = 9457.19343755 MeV + 1115.49969242 MeV LAMBDA cohort = 10572.6931299 where 1115.49969242 MeV = P+ + (N-^ x FSC) when N-^ = N^ - E-^ = 1.293290784 MeV when N^ = 1.293318 MeV FIT and P+ = 938.27231 MeV FIT PROTON 10572.6931299 MeV --------------- 99.99999 27 % 10572.6938963 MeV S 4 UPSILON where the LAMBDA cohort was assumed, resulting in the near perfect percent of accuracy. UPSILON CONSTANT 4 Deriving the charged PION ------------------ Let 10572.6938963 MeV = S 4 UPSILON state - 1115.49969292 MeV LAMBDA cohort = 9457.19420338 MeV = S 1 UPSILON state cohort - 9596.76345642 MeV = E-^ x FSC squared change sign = 139.569184170 MeV = derived charged PION + - --------------- 139.56995 MeV FIT percent of accuracy = 99.999 4512 % In this kind of mathematical derivations the end value for the PION can fluctuate through rather large drifts depending on minisculely small changes in the control term E-^ . For instance if the actual PION mass 139.56995 is added to 9457.19420338 and it is reduced by the FSC squared, the result deviates from E-^ by a very tiny amount: .511040761 ------------ 1 / 99.99999 27 % .511040724 It means a tiny fluctuation at the 8th significant digit of E-^ drifts into a noticable change to the PION mass. A perfect derivation to the PION mass is illusive. Although the goal of a perfect derivation seems real; due to the massive masses of the UPSILONS, and mighty power amplifications of the ELECTRON, leaving pretty well NO room for error; the mass either LANDS right on target, or not at all. The only arbitrary INPUT into the whole scheme is the charged PION mass. It is not derived from other fundamental physical constants in the UPSILON frame described above as UPSILON CONSTANT 4. UPSILON COMMENT 1 ----------------- It is fun, playing with numbers. It is even more fun to see the numbers crunch into nearly perfect exactitudes. This is the same exacting techniques that are used to derived exact binding energy MeV's for different isotopes of atoms. Each possible data digit after the decimal point, is captured to the nth degree of accuracy by heavy breathing physicists. Here in the UPSILON constants nothing is wasted. Every data has an exactitude, expressible in balanced digits and units of MeV. UPSILON COMMENT 2 ----------------- There is an excellent opportunity to see how hidden terms of a certain value can seemingly re-appear as another value of different means but in fact really are the original terms in another coat of colors. The opportunity exists due to the fact that the datas of UPSILON STATEMENTS 1 to 3 are CONSTANTS which have no change in the form of 'flutter' or 'drift'. Here is the opportunity. It is simply this; curiosity arouses to wonder what difference might be seen between the value of 9597.27445548 MeV and 9595.98113748 MeV, when UPSILON cohort 9597.27445548 MeV = E+^ x FSC squared diff = 1.293318 MeV = N^ UPSILON cohort 9595.98113748 MeV = E x FSC squared the diff 1.293318 MeV to be expected, since E+^ differs from E by + (N^ x 1/FSC squared) and both COHORTS are reverse in power amplification ie., TIMES the FSC squared, rather than divided. The point is, the difference here is not significant in terms of any new clue. It is just here because of the CONSTANT math. HIGHLY RELEVENT It is highly relevent, however, to see such a tiny ball bearing drop out of the works due to the fact that the 'works' are constructed entirely from the wave/orbit mechanics of JUPITER's eccentricity of orbit. In the non lineal nature of reciprocals the fact that mass inter bits can be summed in a whole and perfect accord with wave/orbit inter bits, is a powerful scheme concidering the slightest change to the orbit of JUPITER will throw the whole tight collection of reciprocal nature CONSTANTS out the window, stopping the marriage to the BIG picture of UPSILONS by an act of bad faith. UPSILON DATA 5 Second Next Page -------------- Now it is time to say goodby to JUPITER and hurtle across space back to the EARTH MOON METAPHOR FOR SUBATOMIC PHENOMENA. Here in the boondocks of particle lore is another motion picture involving particle waves (Compton), and exact masses, plus other tie-ins to particle states for several different kinds of particles, in yet another mega drama featuring waving wires, directed by the incredible strings of super chords with GODS playing the harmonicas. ---------------- IMAGE 2 UPSILON 1/2 waves at EARTH and VENUS ---------------- Earth 1/2 Venus SUN .---*---.----------------!------------------*------------------* + moon moon - *....................*.....................................* *-------------------------------------* XION WAVE Earth 1/2 Venus SUN .---*---.----------------!------------------*------------------* + moon moon - .....................*..................*................... *------------------* UPSILON wave UPSILON DATA 6 -------------- The UPSILON wave, another 1/2 wave operator, has a converted mass value of 9535.25978462 MeV which at first seems to be sitting in the middle of nowhere until a bit of sleuthing, a mere bit of child's play based on expectations, produces the following picture; UPSILON INTERFACE DATA 1. This is take from an interaction between EARTH and VENUS and is smack in the middle of the EARTH MOON METAPHOR panarama. Converted to particle wave (Compton) mass energy equivalents there is found: ------------------------ UPSILON INTERFACE DATA 1 ------------------------ h^/ 1/2 (Earth - Venus) - MOON = 9715.72078673 MeV diff 180.470002112 MeV Let h^/ 1/2 (Earth - Venus) = 9535.25078462 MeV diff 173.887788338 MeV h^/ 1/2 (Earth - Venus) + MOON = 9361.36299628 MeV Still nothing to look at. But wait. This EARTH/MOON METAPHOR data has not been hooked to the UPSILON. Here is what happens when a HOOK in engaged. ----------------------------------------------------------- Let S 1 UPSILON state = 9461.00464359 MeV from HANDSHAKE 1 in DISCUSSION and MAIN INTRODUCTION, PART 5 ----------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- Let UPSILON cohort = 9457.19341388 MeV from above topic UPSILON CONSTANT 4 Deriving the charged PION --------------------------------------------------- ------------------- UPSILON PICTOGRAM 1 EARTH/MOON METAPHOR interface ------------------- In the following let the ELECTRON be E+^ (NEUTRINO ENHANCED) = .511067935 MeV .oo384401 h^/ 1/2 (EARTH - VENUS) - MOON 1/2 wave |---|---|---|--| 9715.72078673 MeV | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 70.025262505 1/2+ SIGMA + | | | | +|- diff = 180.470002112 + E x FSC ======== | | | | | + P+ + N^ | | | | | - 4/3 E | | | | | = 1189.37947411 MeV | | | | | = 1/2+ SIGMA + [1189.37] MeV FIT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | hook =|===|=*=|===|==| 9595.98104359 MeV UPSILON plateau | | | | | | = E x FSC squared | | | | | | power amplitude | | | | | | when E = .510999065 MeV | | | | | | | | | | | | PION o | | * --------- diff = (134.97640) MeV = PION o FIT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/2 wave * --|-|-|---|--| 9535.25078462 MeV h^/ 1/2 (EARTH - VENUS) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/2+ SIGMA o | | | | +|- diff = 254.716143144 + P+ - N^ ======== | | | | | + 5/3 E | | | | | = 1192.54690961 MeV | | | | | = 1/2+ SIGMA 0 [1192.55] MeV FIT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | S 1 ===|===|=*=|===|==== 9461.00464359 MeV UPSILON particle state | | | | | | | | | 1/2+ SIGMA - | | +| - diff = 258.527349180 + P+ + N^ ======== | | | - 4/3 E | | | = 1197.41155868 MeV | | | = 1/2+ SIGMA - [1197.436] MeV FIT | | | | | | cohort =|===|===|====== 9457.19343755 MeV UPSILON cohort | | | | | | N^ | +|- diff = 354.357790450 approximates | | 2 x N^ x FSC | | = 354.463798138 MeV | | | | 1/2 wave |---|------------ 9361.36299628 MeV h^/ 1/2 (EARTH - VENUS) + MOON .oo384401 in which the singular characteristic of the EARTH MOON METAPHOR interface, is collusion with all three stable SIGMA particles. ====================== POOF! THE CONNECTORS ---------------------- Orbital 'hooks' and other ionnic 'grapples' THE J/PSI INTERLINKS ====================== There are two major particle families that tie together nicely with a few orbital 'hooks' and ionnic 'grapples'. What else can these intermediate connectors be called. Two of the states exist. One is of the famed bottom mesons. The second is a super high mass stable LAMBDA. Both have balls when it comes to linking together thinking particles. A third bridge resonance comes from MARS in tune with EARTH vibrations. The bridges tie together the UPSILON family, with the famous family known as J/PSI mesons whose serindipitous discovery by two different teams of researchers was BIG NEWS announced on the very same day from opposite sides of the North American continent, since the BIG news was proof of existence of a new quark called CHARM. So much for history. CHARM, it seems, can come from the ARMS of the solar system. Here is how. -------------- BRIDGE IMAGE 1 Cosmic oscillations ============== JUPITER eccentricity MARS EARTH VENUS *-----.--|--.-------------*----------------.--*--.--------------* + moon moon - + moon moon - perihelion 1/2 |.........!.........| J/PSI UPSILON bridge |..!..| waves |....!...| 1/2 |.....!.....| |......!......| upper UPSILONS S 3 and S 4 |........!.......| waves |..........!.........| S 1 lower UPSILON waves All are 1/2 waves. BRIDGE DATA 1 ------------- The solar (wave/orbits) depicted in BRIDGE IMAGE 1 Cosmic Oscillations are are all 1/2 waves. ==================================================== HERE IS A SUMMARY OF THE wave SETS depicted by BRIDGE IMAGE 1 ==================================================== WAVE SET 1 JUPITER mean - perihelion ======================================== WHEN J^ is Jupiter's eccentricity (Jupiter orbit mean - perihelion) THEN upper UPSILONS S 3 and S 4 occur as |..!..| S 4 UPSILON 10572.6938963 MeV h^/ 1/2 (j^ - moon) |...!...| cohort 10465.4896238 MeV h^/ 1/2 (j^) |....!....| S 3 UPSILON 10360.4375734 MeV h^/ 1/2 (j^ + moon) ALSO |.....| full wave 5286.34694815 MeV h^/ (j^ - moon) |.......| full wave 5232.74481190 MeV h^/ (j^) |.........| full wave 5180.21878670 MeV h^/ (j^ + moon) WAVE SET 2 EARTH - VENUS ============================ 1/2 h^/ 1/2 (EARTH - VENUS) - MOON |......!......| 9715.72078673 MeV |........!.......| 9535.25078462 MeV h^/ 1/2 (EARTH - VENUS) |..........!.........| 9361.36299628 MeV S 1 lower UPSILON h^/ 1/2 (EARTH - VENUS) + MOON waves Detailed further above, and summarized as UPSILON PICTOGRAM 1 EARTH MOON METAPHOR interface WAVE SET 3 EARTH - MARS ========================== 1/2 |.........!.........| 5037.51022864 MeV obtained by J/PSI Upsilon bridge h^/ 1/2 (Earth + Mars) wave -------------------- BRIDGE PICTOGRAM 1 J/PSI UPSILON interface ====================== THE UPSLION CASCADES -------------------- UPSILON =|=======|======== 10864.0 MeV UPSILON 1/2 wave | | h^/ 1/2 (EARTH - VENUS) - MOON | | | | | | hook | ----|||------* 10465.489238 MeV h^/ 1/2 J^ 1/2 wave | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | S 3 UPSILON |=======|===|===| 10360.4375734 MeV 1/2 wave | | | | | | | | | | | | hook 1 |-------|-------| 9597.27445548 MeV = E+^ x FSC squared | | | | hook 2 |---*---|-------| 9596.25231961 MeV = hook 1 - 2 E+^ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | S 1 UPSILON |---|---|-*-|-*-| 9457.19343755 MeV S 1 UPSILON cohort 1/2 wave | | | | | | | in UPSILON CONSTANTS 1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (J/PSI high) | +|- =======|=|= diff = 4416.03353291 MeV | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | full wave * | *---|-|-| 5432.0 MeV approximates upper lambda | | | | | | = 1/2 UPSILON 10864.0 MeV | | | | | | | | + - ----*- 5428.0 MeV approximates B*s meson | | | | | | 5427.97901514 MeV | | | | | | B*s (5422) MeV | | | | | | meson | | | | | | 5425.0 MeV approximates B*s meson | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | full wave * --*--*--|-|-|-| 5180.21878670 MeV BRIDGE | | | | 1/2 UPSILON 10360.4375734 MeV | | | | | | | | 1/2 wave | *<--*-* 5037.51022864 MeV (wave/orbit) EARTH - MARS | | = h^/ 1/2 (Earth - Mars) | | | | RHO +|- | diff = 764.185253790 MeV power | | approx 764.207695110 MeV amplitude | | = - P+ change sign | | = 174.064614888 MeV | | = 5/2 E+^ x FSC | | - 2 E+^ | | | | | | cohort | *==*=== 4419.68320891 MeV | | J/PSI high *===|==*========= 4416.03353291 MeV | | | J/PSI [4415] MeV AVERAGE | | | | | | | | | 1/2+ XION | +|- | diff = 1319.04938308 MeV isospin | | | = h^/ Earth (wave/orbit) | | | | | | 1/2+ XION - | | *--- diff = 1322.44749259 MeV negative | | | = h^/ Earth - moon (wave/orbit) | | | | | | | | | cohort | | *=== 3097.23571631 | | --------------- 99.99999 23 % *** | | * 3097.23595435 | | | | | | diff = 1/2 (E+^ - 2E+^ x 1/FSC) ** | | | J/PSI low *===|===========| 3096.98414983 J/PSI [3096.88] MeV AVERAGE ** The 2E+^ x 1/FSC underplus may be just space dust not an official mass increment. *** 3097.23571631 --------------- 99.99999 23 % 3097.23595435 This tiny percent of error serves to represent what is left over as a discrepency after interlinks in an huge MeV range of 9596.25231961 to 3096.98414983 = 6499.26904627 MeV spread. Note that the accuracy is what is left over after a cascade of math datas beginning at 9597.27445548 = E+^ x FSC squared, and ending at the J/PSI low particle. This is a very wide range and includes two (wave/orbit) MeV values for both Earth orbit itself, and the Earth - moon (wave/orbit) MeV. In all 6 different planetary orbital MeV waves are in this model. All in all an extremely T I G H T cascade through a major skyscraping tower of power. ------------------- BRIDGE PICTOGRAM 2 J/PSI UPSILON interface 'ionnic grapples' ------------------- -------------------------------- UPSILONS | S 4 10572 MeV | | |---- |---- power amplitude |---- E+^ x FSC squared |---- |---- bridge diff | 1115 MeV 1/2+ LAMBDA |---- |---- | | ULSILON interface ===== S 1 9460 MeV | | |---- |---- |---- bridge diff | 5037 MeV h^/ 1/2 (Earth - Mars) | | | J/PSI interface ===== high 4416 MeV | | bridge diff | 1/2 + XION - | 1/2 + XION isospin | | hook to J/PSI's | low 3097 MeV ----------------------------------------- BRIDGE COMMENT 1 ---------------- Hello again; here is an excellent opportunity, to see how HIDDEN terms of a certain value can seemingly re-appear as another value of different means but in fact really are the original terms in another coat of colors. Taking DATAS from BRIDGE PICTOGRAM 1 immediately above; AND DERIVING 4416.03353298 MeV + 5180.21878670 MeV = 9596.25231961 MeV WHICH IS .511013505 x FSC squared. CLEARLY .511013505 is NOT E+^ = .511067935 MeV. HOWEVER .511067935 - .511013505 = .oooo54430 MeV = 2 E+^ divided by FSC squared. EXACTLY ! It is HIDDEN ! Bingo! ================== SUMMARY STATEMENTS ================== SUMMARY STATEMENT 1 ------------------- The single term 9457.585 (the bottom term in UPSILON DATA 3), is the single term which lock steps three different groups of grappling particles into one main Cosmic OSCILLLATION. It is a generic value for 9457.19343755 MeV (a Cohort), which has been derived via UPSILON CONSTANTS and used immediately above in UPSILON PICTOGRAM 1. SUMMARY STATEMENT 2 The included NEUTRINO ------------------- It became more and more apparent, as the UPSILON factors were explored and determined, that masses fit together in lock step with (wave/orbits) in CONSTANT form, when the ELECTRON augmented by the alledged NEUTRINO mass yielding character E+^ is used for all derivations. Things that kept pushing and poking calculations out of shape vanished, when E+^ is used in lieu of an ELECTRON rest state mass by itself. The details become lock stepped as CONSTANTS when an E+^ NEUTRINO augmented ELECTRON mass is used as the ELECTRON's fundamental unit in the UPSILON skyscraping tower of power. SUMMARY STATEMENT 3 PURE and THERMODYNAMIC forces ------------------- It is quite possible that the data CONSTANTS of UPSILON DATA 4 'Next Page' are a pure form of understructure, something akin to pure Rydberg numbers which define atomic spectum states, and the actual look of the resonating matter is the kind of data which is summarized in the UPSILON DATAS 1 through 3, which are the thermodynamic. The resonating matter point of view is substantiated by material presented in DISCUSSION and MAIN INTRODUCTION in PART 5 under HANDSHAKE 2 in which eccentricity terms for JUPITER are presented in full waves, rather than in 1/2 wavelength links presented in the UPSILON DATAS. For instance 5179.94256805 MeV is cited in HANDSHAKE 2 as a direct link between the S 1 UPSILON 9460 MeV state and the 4416 MeV J/PI state for its higher mass. 5179.942 MeV is 1/2 amount 10359.881 MeV, shown above near the beginning of this topic, as the S 3 UPSILON state under UPSILON DATA 1. 5428.0 a higher bottom B* state is 1/2 the UPSILON upper state of 10860.0 MeV. Actually, the real UPSILON upper state of (10865.0 MeV) is twice 5432.5 MeV. There are several other links. Rather than spell them out in dialogue, let us SEE how they work in practice in particle mass derivations. You can see them derived a second time, this time as lock step CONSTANTS, under THE J/PSI INTERLINKS immediately above. - end of ITS UP TO THE UPSILONS - - end of The EARTH/MOON METAPHOR For Subatomic Phenomena - PART 10 ------------------------------------------------------ SYMMETRY FACTORS ------------------------------------------------------------ ============ VENUS RISING ============ A look into the HEART of simple SU(3) symmetry can be started by a look into the HEART of VENUS. The following picture contains a (wave/orbit) bracket around the well known (Neutron-Proton) mass difference. -------------- Home of the PROTON-NEUTRON mass difference -------------- Venus SUN .------*------.-----------------------------------------------* + moon moon - *...............................................* *......................................................* *.............................................................* The above picture contains nothing astounding except the Moon of Earth has been put in orbit around Venus and the mechanical picture used to portray a pattern that claims itself a re-iterative existence for the Neutron-Proton mass difference through lineal sum of wavelength (Compton) bits and pieces, and lineal sum factoring of single and amplified mass units as well. Here is the scene in schematics and symmetry patterns in digital data details, using Venus as a SOLAR model for a subatomic (wave/mass) occurrence. *....... h^/ (Venus) - moon = 1830.07508736 MeV | mean | ------------|------ h^/ (Venus) = 1823.57393767 MeV of orbit | | *....... h^/ (Venus) - moon = 1817.11881384 MeV charge 3/2- XION - *....... 1830.07508736 MeV | | Venus 3/2- XION --|------ 1823.57393767 MeV | | 3/2- XION o *....... 1817.11881384 MeV charge ---------- AMPLITUDES ---------- - charge *....... 1830.07508736 MeV - P+ x 1/5 - N^ + 1/3 E = N^ x FSC | | | venus --|------- 1823.57393767 MeV - P+ x 1/5 + 1/3 E = N^ x FSC | | | *....... 1817.11881384 MeV - P+ x 1/5 + N^ + 1/3 E = N^ x FSC o charge - charge *....... - P+ x 1/5 - N^ + 1/3 E = N^ x FSC = 177.237570493 MeV | | | venus --|------- - P+ x 1/5 + 1/3 E = N^ x FSC = 177.230658555 MeV | | | *....... - P+ x 1/5 + N^ + 1/3 E = N^ x FSC = 177.232951789 MeV o charge Notice the self evident (+ -) bracketing of N^ and 1/3 E . - charge *....... - P+ x 1/5 - N^ + 1/3 E x 1/FSC = 1.2933365130 MeV | | | venus --|------- - P+ x 1/5 + 1/3 E x 1/FSC = 1.293314692 MeV | | | *....... - P+ x 1/5 + N^ + 1/3 E x 1/FSC = 1.293331426 MeV o charge where N^ = 1.293318 MeV FIT where FSC = 137.0359895 See what I mean! NOTE another + unit of 1/3 E MeV - charge *....... - P+ x 1/5 - N^ + 2/3 E + P+ = 1115.68021351 MeV | | | venus --|------ - P+ x 1/5 + 2/3 E + P+ = 1115.67330157 MeV | | | *....... - P+ x 1/5 + N^ + 2/3 E + P+ = 1115.67559481 MeV 0 charge 1/2+ stable LAMBDA 1115.685 MeV FIT 1115.678 MeV BEST EXPERIMENT This experiment's value is by far the most occurrances. And so you SEE ! The opening statement under -------------- Home of the PROTON-NEUTRON mass difference -------------- has been vindicated. ===================================== Here is another look at VENUS RISING ===================================== h^/ (Venus mean) - Moon = 1830.07508736 MeV - P+ divide by 5 - N^ + 1/3 E = N^ x FSC divide by FSC = 1.2933365130 MeV h^/ (Venus mean) = 1823.57393767 MeV - P+, divide by 5, + 1/3 E = N^ x FSC divide by FSC = 1.293314692 MeV h^/ (Venus mean) + Moon = 1817.11881384 MeV - P+ divide by 5 + N^ + 1/3 E = N^ x FSC divide by FSC = 1.293331426 MeV WHERE N^ is the (Neutron - Proton) mass difference (1.293318) MeV FIT Unmistakable features include symmetrical + - N^ factors + - MOON factors + units of 1/3 the Electron. NOTE the accuracy 1.293314692 MeV (from Venus mean orbit) ----------------- ratio = 99.999 7442 % (1.293318) MeV ------------------------------------------ REVERSE ENGINEERING for VENUS RISING ------------------------------------------ Starting with the FIT value of N^, and working in reverse direction, to derive planet orbit for Venus. Let N^ = (1.293318) MeV FIT FOR VENUS MEAN N^ x FSC - 1/3 E + N^ x 5 + P+ = N,1 h^/(N,1) - MOON = Venus MEAN derived = 1.082108703 x 10 to 13 cm actual = 1.082089677 x 10 to 13 cm FOR VENUS MEAN N^ x FSC - 1/3 E x 5 + P+ = N,1 h^/(N,1) = Venus MEAN derived = 1.082088332 x 10 to 13 cm actual = 1.082089677 x 10 to 13 cm FOR VENUS MEAN N^ x FSC - 1/3 E - N^ x 5 + P+ = N,1 h^/(N,1) + MOON = Venus MEAN derived = 1.082095174 x 10 to 13 cm actual = 1.082089677 x 10 to 13 cm NOTE Two unmistakable characteristics in pattern: All three clusters have a - 1/3 E mass increment, N^ switches from positive to negative for Moon orbit increments negative to positive, and N^ is absent from Venus planet orbit itself. - end of VENUS RISING - ========================= SU(3) MULTIPLEX GROUPINGS ========================= ------------------------------------------ SU(3) SYMMETRIES the stable LAMBDA ------------------------------------------ The following schematic contains several selections of PROTON related information. *------------------------ h^/ (Venus mean) = ---------------------- 3/2- XION neutral 1823.57393767 | diff | + 885.301627671 MeV | ------------------------------ PROTON MeV (938.27231) MeV FIT h^/ (Venus mean) = 1823.57393767 MeV - P+ = 885.301627671 MeV let V0 = 885.301627671 MeV divide by 5 = 177.060325534 MeV AMPLIFIED mass difference 6 = 147.550271278 MeV SU(3) decuplet 7 = 126.471661095 MeV SU(3) octuplet where N^ x FSC - 1/3 Electron = 177.060778846 MeV and N^ = (1.23318) MeV FIT where 177.060778846 MeV is a (LAMBDA - PROTON) mass difference such that 177.060778846 MeV + 2/3 E = 177.401444889 MeV + P+ = 1115.67375488 MeV where 1/2+ LAMBDA stable = (1115.684) MeV FIT NOTE The mass accuracy 1115.67330157 MeV derived from ---------------- ratio = 99.999 0410 % h^/ (Venus mean) (1115.684) MeV - P+ x 1/5 + 2/3 E + P+ = LAMBDA NOTE The mass accuracy 1115.67375488 MeV derived from ------------------ ratio = 99.999 0817 % N^ x FSC (1115.684) MeV + 1/3 E + P+ = LAMBDA NOTE Mass accuracy 1115.67330157 MeV derived from Venus, ------------------ ratio = 99.9999 593 % and from 1115.67375488 MeV Neutron - Proton mass difference IN THE FOLLOWING SCHEMATIC: using V+ x 1/5 from Venus orbit *------------------------ 1/2+ LAMBDA 1115.67330157 MeV | + 2/3 Electron MeV diff | + 177.060325534 MeV = V+ + ------- ----------------- PROTON MeV diff | - 177.060325534 MeV = V+ - | - 2 Electron MeV *------------------------ RHO MeV 760.189986336 MeV = RHO (mass/wave) resonance which is ... h^/ (Earth aphelion + Venus perhelion) = 760.195477903 MeV See more about RHO wide width resonances under HOW ABOUT THOSE RHO's in PART 5. In schematic form, using just (Neutron - Proton) = N^ *------------------------ 1/2+ LAMBDA = 1115.67375488 MeV | | + 1/3 Electron MeV diff | + N^ x FSC | + ------- ----------------- PROTON MeV | - diff | + N^ x FSC | - 1 Electron MeV | - 2/3 Electron MeV | *------------------------ RHO MeV 760.189533023 MeV RHO MeV (mass/wave) resonance from h^/ (Venus) - P+ = V+ = 760.189986336 MeV From V+ (Venus) 760.189986336 --------------- 99.9999 403 % From N^ x FSC 760.189533023 ------------------------------------------ SU(3) SYMMETRIES the OCTUPLET ------------------------------------------ Starting again with another (wave/orbit) string from the 3/2- XION group: h^/ (Venus mean) + Moon = 1817.11881381 MeV - P+ = 878.846503812 MeV V+ let V+ = 878.846503812 MeV divide by 5 = 175.769300762 MeV 6 = 146.474417302 MeV SU(3) decuplet 7 = 125.549500544 MeV SU(3) octuplet -------------------- AN OMEGA ? -------------------- V+ x 5/6 = 732.372086510 MeV SU(3) stable Omega + P+ + E + N^ = 1672. 44871357 MeV 3/2+ OMEGA = (1672. 44) MeV FIT --------------------------- A NEUTRAL KAON example --------------------------- V+ x 3/6 from P+ - 7/3 E = 497.656726942 MeV KAON o (497.672) MeV FIT showing some drift. =========================== SU(3) GROUPS =========================== An SU(3) OCTUPLET group arrives as follows: When V+ = h^/ (VENUS) + moon - P+ = 878.846503812 *----------------------- SU(3) OCTUPLET using P+ + (V+ + x/7) | | + 125.549500544 MeV = 1314. 92081163 MeV | + 125.549500544 MeV = 1189. 37131108 MeV | + 125.549500544 MeV = 1063. 82181054 MeV | *----------------------------P+ = PROTON MeV where the following stable particle mass states have just been calculated as follows: *----------------------- SU(3) OCTUPLET | | V+ x 3/7 + P+ = 1/2+ XION o | V+ x 2/7 + P+ = 1/2+ SIGMA + | V+ x 1/7 + P+ = unknown | *----------------------------P+ = PROTON MeV which match known stable particle masses as follows: *----------------------- SU(3) OCTUPLET | | 1/2+ XION o = (1314.9) MeV FIT | 1/2+ SIGMA + = (1189.37) MeV FIT | = unknown | *----------------------------P+ = (938.27231) MeV FIT where V+ = P+ - h^/ (Venus mean) + Moon in agreements that include such mass calculated accuracy as (1189.37) MeV FIT -------------- = 99.999 8897 % 1189. 37131108 MeV -------------------------------------------------- SU(3) SYMMETRIES the rest of the OCTUPLET -------------------------------------------------- Using the converse obital harmonic of Venus, that is: h^/ (Venus mean) - Moon = 1830.07508733 MeV AND 1830.07508733 MeV - P+ = 891.802777332 MeV LET V- = 891.802777332 MeV then the following occurs. 1/7 of V- = 127.400396761 MeV 1/6 of V- = 148.633796222 MeV 1/5 of V- = 178.360555466 MeV WHERE V- x 1/7 x 2 + P+ - 1 E = 1192. 56210445 MeV x 3 + P+ + 8/3 E = 1321. 32516539 MeV V- x 1/5 + P+ - N^ = 1115. 33954746 MeV V- x 3/6 from P+ + N^ = 493. 664239334 MeV KAON Putting these into a schematic, the picture is: When V- = h^/ (VENUS) - moon - P+ = 891.802777332 *----------------------- SU(3) OCTUPLET using P+ + (V- + x/7) | | + 127.400283904 MeV = 1320. 47350028 MeV | + 127.400283904 MeV = 1193. 07310352 MeV | + 127.400283904 MeV = 1065. 67270676 MeV | *----------------------------P+ = PROTON MeV where the following two stable particle mass states are calculated as follows: *----------------------- SU(3) OCTUPLET | | V- x 3/7 + P+ - 5/3 E = 1321. 32516539 MeV | V- x 2/7 + P+ - 1 E = 1192. 56210445 MeV | V- x 1/7 + P+ = unknown | *----------------------------P+ = PROTON MeV which match known stable baryon particle masses as follows: *----------------------- SU(3) OCTUPLET | | 1/2+ XION - = (1321.32) MeV FIT | 1/2+ SIGMA o = (1192.55) MeV FIT | *----------------------------P+ = (938.27231) MeV FIT ------------------------------------------ SU(3) SYMMETRIES the DECUPLET ------------------------------------------ ------------- First ROUTING ------------- The DECUPLET SU(3) group can be approximated from several routes. This that follows seems to be a main thoroughfare. where V+ = P+ - h^/(Earth) + Moon = 377.396382114 MeV V+ x 7/3 = 880.591558266 MeV divide by 6 = 146.765259711 MeV SU(3) decuplet units *--------------- SU(3) DECUPLET using P+ + (V+ x 7/3 x ?/6) | | + 146.765259711 MeV = 1672. 09860855 MeV OMEGA | + 146.765259711 MeV = 1525. 33334884 MeV too low *...| + 146.765259711 MeV = 1378. 56808913 MeV SIGMA | | + 146.765259711 MeV = 1231. 80282942 MeV DELTA | | + 146.765259711 MeV = 1085. 03756971 MeV unknown | *-|------------------------------- P+ = PROTON MeV | | - 146.765259711 MeV | - 146.765259711 MeV |.... - 146.765259711 MeV = 497. 976530867 MeV - 2/3 E = 497. 635864823 MeV KAON o ... (497.672) MeV FIT showing some drift where particle masses are determined as follows: *--------------- SU(3) DECUPLET using P+ + (V+ x 7/3 x ?/6) | | + 146.765259711 MeV + 2/3 E = 1672. 43927459 MeV OMEGA | + 146.765259711 MeV = 1525. 33290995 MeV too low *...| + 146.765259711 MeV - 1 E = 1378. 05709006 MeV SIGMA | | + 146.765259711 MeV - 1 E = 1231. 29183035 MeV DELTA | | + 146.765259711 MeV = .............. ... unknown | *-|------------------------------- P+ = PROTON MeV *------------------------ SU(3) DECUPLET MASSES alternatives | | V+ x 7/3 x 5/6 + P+ + 2/3 E = 1672. 43927459 MeV | V+ x 7/3 x 4/6 + P+ = too low *...| V+ x 7/3 x 3/6 + P+ - N^ = 1378. 05695840 MeV | | V+ x 7/3 x 2/6 + P+ - 4/3 E = 1231. 12149733 MeV | | V+ x 7/3 x 1/6 + P+ = unknown | |----------------------------- P+ = PROTON MeV which match known particle masses as follows: *----------------------- SU(3) DECUPLET | | (1672.43) MeV AVERAGE = 3/2+ OMEGA - | none = 3/2+ XION *...| (1378.0) MeV EXPERIMENT = 3/2+ SIGMA + | | (1231.1) MeV EXPERIMENT = 3/2+ DELTA + + | | .......... = unknown | |-------------------------------P+ = (938.27231) MeV FIT | | | | | *...| (497.672) MeV FIT = KAON o However, a neutral KAON is not experimentally known to associate with a positive 3/2+ SIGMA decay, so this Ping.Pong resonance seems not to be a depicted decay mode, unless this KAON has other properties from the stranger side of KAONS. ------------------------ Regards the OMEGA mass ------------------------ -------------------- NOTE Regards 3/2+ OMEGA [1672.45] MeV FIT -------------------- This 1672. 43927459 MeV is the only mass possible in the EARTH MOON METAPHOR group of particle masses that corresponds to the FIT mass of the 3/2+ OMEGA. This is from the (Earth) + Moon (wave/orbit) mass resonance from the above DECUPLET set by the string P+ - h^/(Earth) + Moon x 7/3 x 5/6 + P+ + 2/3 E = 1672. 43927459 MeV . The Earth (wave/orbit) resonance itself produces a mass of 1678.67217433 MeV which is far too high to be the OMEGA. From h^/ (Earth) - P+ x 7/3 x 5/6 + P+ The Venus (wave/orbit) resonance itself produces a mass of 1676.02366639 MeV, which is still too high to be the OMEGA. The resonance is by the equation 1. P+ - h^/(Venus) x 5/6 + P+ = 1676.02366639 MeV . 2. The h^/(Venus) + Moon (wave/orbit) resonance P+ - h^/(Venus) x 5/6 + P+ = 1670.64439651 MeV . is a tad too low for an OMEGA however 1670.64439651 + N^ + E = 1672.44871357 MeV . 3. The h^/(Earth + Venus) (wave/orbit) resonance P+ - h^/(Earth + Venus) x 5/4 + P+ = 1678.94798216 MeV . is far too high to be an OMEGA, although note that it differs from string 1 by: 1678.94798216 MeV - 2 N^ - 2/3 E = 1676.02068011 MeV . 4. The h^/(Earth + Venus) + Moon (wave/orbit) resonance hits upon the OMEGA mass range, not the FIT value but within the range of more than one experiment: P+ - h^/(Earth + Venus) + Moon x 5/4 + P+ = 1673.25868114 MeV - (N^ - E) = .782318935 = 1672.4763622 MeV. ============ ----------------------- SEVERAL DECUPLET ROUTES ----------------------- The DECUPLET SU(3) group can be approximated from several routes, such as the following: -------------- Second ROUTING -------------- where V- = P+ - h^/(Venus) - Moon = 891.802777332 MeV divide by 5 = 178.360555466 MeV 6 = 148.633796222 MeV SU(3) decuplet 7 = 127.400396764 MeV SU(3) octuplet *---------------------- SU(3) DECUPLET using P+ + (V- x ?/6) | | + 148.633796222 MeV = 1681. 44129111 MeV not OMEGA | + 148.633796222 MeV ...... = 1532. 80749488 MeV *...| + 148.633796222 MeV ...... = 1384. 17369866 MeV | | + 148.633796222 MeV ...... = 1235. 53990244 MeV | | + 148.633796222 MeV = 1086. 90610622 MeV | *-|------------------------------- P+ = PROTON MeV | | - 148.633796222 MeV | - 148.633796222 MeV |.... - 148.633796222 MeV = 492.370921334 MeV + N^ = 493. 664239334 MeV KAON + - ... (493.677) MeV FIT NOTE In this routing the CHARGED KAON is produced. In the previously shown 'First ROUTING' the NEUTRAL KAON particle occurred by the string P+ - (P+ - h^/(Earth) + Moon x 7/3 x 3/6) = 497. 976530867 MeV - 2/3 E = 497. 635864823 MeV KAON o ... (497.672) MeV FIT where particle masses are determined as follows: *----------------------- SU(3) DECUPLET MASSES | | V- x 5/6 + P+ = unknown, too high for 3/2+ OMEGA | V- x 4/6 + P+ - 2 E = 1531. 78549675 MeV 3/2+ XION | V- x 3/6 + P+ - N^ = 1382. 88038066 MeV 3/2+ SIGMA | V- x 2/6 + P+ - 1 E = 1235. 02890337 MeV 3/2+ DELTA | V- x 1/6 + P+ = unknown | *----------------------------P+ = PROTON MeV which match known particle masses as follows: *----------------------- SU(3) DECUPLET | | .......... = unknown | (1538.78) MeV AVERAGE = 3/2+ XION - | (1382.8) MeV AVERAGE = 3/2+ SIGMA + | (1234.9 MeV ESTIMATE = 3/2+ DELTA + | .......... = unknown | *----------------------------P+ = (938.27231) MeV FIT =================================== SU(3) SUMMARY REMARK =================================== Only a few SU(3) data banks have been illustrated in factors inherent in the Earth Moon Metaphor For Subatomic Phenomena. There are SU(3) symmetry data banks inherent in each of - moon h^/ (Earth) by n/3 factors + moon - moon h^/ 1/2 (Earth + Venus) by 3/2 x n/7 factors + moon - moon h^/ (Venus) by n/7 factors + moon each of which has PROTON plus ratios such as 3/7 or 4/5 times the (wave/orbit) MeV, minus the PROTON in the algorythm. *---------------------- SU(3) data bank OCTUPLET | *...| P+ + Ballon ratio y ...... = 1/2+ particle | | P+ + Ballon ratio y ...... = 1/2+ particle | | P+ + Ballon ratio y = unknown | *-|------------------------------- P+ = PROTON MeV | *---------------------- SU(3) data bank DECUPLET | | P+ + Ballon ratio z ...... = 3/2+ particle | P+ + Ballon ratio z ...... = 3/2+ particle *...| P+ + Ballon ratio z ...... = 3/2+ particle | | P+ + Ballon ratio z ...... = 3/2+ particle | | P+ + Ballon ratio z = unknown | *-|------------------------------- P+ = PROTON MeV | | P+ - Ballon ratio z | P+ - Ballon ratio z |.... P+ - Ballon ratio z for ratios = 148 MeV range = KAON MeV BALLOONS are discussed in more detail under BALLOON MASS STATES, in PART 14. ================================= The PROTON (plus.minus) Ping.Pong ================================= The 'PING.PONG' of the PROTON is introduced as a two way summing technique that manifests the mesh of several corresponding masses. Here is a quick schematic of the nature of 'PING.PONGS' in the PROTON. *---------------------------- | *---| baryon = P+ + ?+n x BALLOON mass state + *---| baryon = P+ + ? x BALLOON mass state | | | | -----|--------------------- PROTON MeV | | | | - *---| meson = P+ - ? x BALLOON mass state *---| meson = P+ - ?+n x BALLOON mass state | *---------------------------- Here mesons and baryons constructed of identical lineal sum terms occur in different mass pairs, linked to the Proton mass as multiple LINEAL SUM terms added to the Proton, and subtracted from the Proton in equal amounts. For instance, ?+n can mean a mass unit (+) expanded by adding integer units of (?) to itself (n) number of times, and these sums are then added or subtracted upon the PROTON. The nature of this (plus.minus) above and below the Proton mass, is given the buzz word Ping.Pong for the sake of creating an instant concrete picture for such a unique fact amongst particle wave/orbit resonances. BALLOONS are discussed in more detail under BALLOON MASS STATES, in PART 14. ----------------------- A PING.PONG STATEMENT ----------------------- Here in schematic form, a PING.PONG correspondence with the CHARGED KAON and 3/2+ SIGMA + particles, featuring units of N^ producing the exact derivations, where (Neutron - Proton) mass difference is N^ . Featuring V- = the h^/ (venus) - moon (wave/orbit) *------------------------ 3/2+ SIGMA + (mass/wave) resonance | | + *---|- 3/2+ SIGMA + = (1382.8) MeV FIT | | | | - N^ = 1382. 88038065 MeV | | + 3/6 V- = 1384.173698661 MeV | | | | -----|------------------------- PROTON MeV | | | | - 3/6 V- = 492. 370921334 MeV | | + N^ = 493. 664239334 MeV - *---|- | KAON + - ... (493.677) MeV FIT | *------------------------ KAON MeV (mass/wave) resonance from h^/ (Venus) - Moon NOTE characteristic + N^ and - N^ terms in this PROTON Ping.Pong. ------------------------ DECAY MODES SEEN AT ONCE ------------------------ NOTE This PROTON Ping.Pong seems to tell of a 'decay' mode. KAON - is the main decay mode of 3/2+ SIGMA + So if N^ the (Neutron - Proton) mass difference therefore housing an Electron then it should carry a unit of - (minus) charge, so that the charge switch from Postive SIGMA to Negative KAON is seen at once in the above (plus.minus) PROTON Ping.Pong . ------------------------ Pro tem OCTUPLET array ------------------------ In an OCTUPLET array, the Second ROUTING source codes produce the following stable particles. An SU(3) OCTUPLET group arrives as follows: using V- = P+ - h^/ (Venus mean) - Moon and V- x 1/7 = 127.400396761 MeV *--------------------- SU(3) OCTUPLET using P+ + (V- x ?/?) | *--|- 3/7 x V- + P+ + 5/3 E = 1321. 32516539 MeV | | 2/7 x V- + P+ - 1 E = 1192. 56210445 MeV | | 1/5 x V- + P+ + 2/3 E - N^ = 1115. 68021350 MeV | | *---------------------------------------P+ = PROTON MeV | | | | | | *--|- P+ - 3/6 x V- + N^ = 493. 664239334 MeV KAON | *-----------------------------------KAON + - which clearly match known stable particle masses as follows: *----------------------- SU(3) OCTUPLET | *--|- 1/2+ XION - = (1321.32) MeV FIT | | 1/2+ SIGMA o = (1192.55) MeV FIT | | 1/2+ LAMBDA o = (1115.684) MeV FIT | | *----------------------------P+ = (938.27231) MeV FIT | | | | | | KAON + - = (493.677) MeV FIT *--|- | *-------------------------- NOTE This PROTON (plus.minus) Ping.Pong seems to be a depict a 'decay' mode. KAON - is the main decay mode of 1/2+ XION - ------------------------- Complete OCTUPLET array ------------------------- A more complete symmetry grouping is now right at hand. Picking up on datas originally introduced further above under ----------------------------------- SU(3) SYMMETRIES the OCTUPLET ----------------------------------- a more complete picture can be evolved, using two planetary (wave-orbit) resonances, to capture two different sets for Charge states of the Stable baryon particles. The two planetary (wave-orbit) resonances are: V- = P+ - h^/ (Venus mean) - Moon V+ = P+ - h^/ (Venus mean) + Moon where the V- set has already been itemized in the PRO TEM OCTUPLET ARRAY immediately above. Using V+ = P+ - h^/ (Venus mean) + Moon the other stable baryon set is: *--------------------- SU(3) OCTUPLET using P+ + (V+ x ?/?) | *--|- 3/7 x V+ + P+ + 5/3 E = 1314. 92081163 MeV | | 1/2+ XION = [1314.9] MeV FIT | | | | 2/7 x V+ + P+ = 1189. 37131108 MeV | | 1/2+ SIGMA = [1189.37] MeV FIT | | | | 1/5 x V+ + P+ + 2/3 E + N^ = 1115. 67559480 MeV | | 1/2+ LAMBDA = [1115.684] MeV FIT | | *---------------------------------------P+ = PROTON MeV | | | | | | *--|- P+ - 3/6 x V- + 7/3 E = 497. 656726942 MeV | *-------------------------------KAON + - [497.672] MeV FIT - end of SU(3) MULTIPLEX GROUPINGS - ================================================================= THE STABLE PARTICLES OF STATUS **** ================================================================= Here is a MASTER schematic, of all of the STABLE fundamental BARYON particles, all determined as wave (Compton) coupled in mass harmonic multiple units, the entire group modelled COMPLETELY upon the orbit of the planet named VENUS in the solar system. minus Oops, sorry, the 1/2+ SIGMA - particle does not show up anywhere, its mass seems too far out of range for any of the orbit wave derivations to land close, let alone strike right on. Its mass range of 1197 MeV seems to have no solar (wave/orbit) image, at least not that has been seen, so far. FUTURE STRIKE That negative charged stable SIGMA has shown up locked in the jaws of a prefect mass symmetry, described later, in PART 10-A as BANG BUBBLES. ------------------------------- MASTER SCHEMATIC data ------------------------------- PHYSICISTS AND MATHEMATICIANS N O T E WHAT ARE THE O D D S OF HITTING T H E S E threee BARYON M A S S E S RIGHT ON TARGET BY C O I N C I D E N C E S ? stable baryons *------------------------ h^/ (Venus) - Moon = V- = 891.801 MeV | | V- x 3/7 + P+ + 5/2 E = 1321.325 [1321.32] MeV FIT | x 2/7 + P+ - 1 E = 1192.562 [1192.55] MeV FIT | | x 1/5 + P+ + 2/3 E - N^ = 1115.680 [1115.684] MeV FIT | + | ------------------------- PROTON MeV - | | | V- x 3/6 from P+ + N^ = 493. 664 MeV | KAON + - ... [493. 677] MeV FIT | *------------------------ stable kaon meson PHYSICISTS AND MATHEMATICIANS N O T E WHAT ARE THE O D D S OF HITTING T H E S E two BARYON M A S S E S RIGHT ON TARGET BY C O I N C I D E N C E S ? stable baryons *------------------------ h^/ Venus + Moon = V+ = 878.845 MeV | | V+ x 3/7 + P+ = 1314.921 [1314.9] MeV FIT | x 2/7 + P+ = 1189.371 [1189.37] MeV FIT | + | ------------------------- PROTON P+ - | | | V+ x 2/7 from P+ - PION + - - 1/3 E = 547.433 MeV | ETA o = [547.45] MeV FIT | | V+ x 3/6 from P+ - 7/3 E = 497. 657 MeV | KAON o = [497. 672] MeV FIT | *------------------------ KAON MeV (mass/wave) resonance stable mesons where PION + - = [139.56995] MeV FIT -------------------------------- MASTER SCHEMATIC fits -------------------------------- stable baryons *------------------------ h^/ Venus - Moon = V- | | 1/2+ XION - = [1321.32] MeV FIT | 1/2+ SIGMA o = [1192.55] MeV FIT | | 1/2+ LAMBDA o = [1115.684] MeV FIT + | ------------------------- PROTON P+ - | | KAON + - ... [493. 677] MeV FIT | *------------------------ stable kaon meson stable baryons *------------------------ h^/ Venus + Moon = V+ | | 1/2+ XION o = [1314.9] MeV FIT | 1/2+ SIGMA + = [1189.37] MeV FIT | | 1/2+ LAMBDA o = [1115.684] MeV FIT + | ------------------------- PROTON P+ - | | ETA o ... [547.45] MeV FIT | | KAON o ... [493. 677] MeV FIT | | PION + - ... [139.56995] MeV FIT | *------------------------ stable kaon meson -------------------------------------------- AND FINALLY simple single pictures -------------------------------------------- *------------------------ h^/ VENUS - MOON = V- | - | ------------------------ h^/ VENUS mean of Orbit = V0 + | | *------------------------ h^/ VENUS + MOON = V+ stable baryons *------------------------ h^/ Venus + Moon = V+ | | P+ + 3/7 V+ + = 1/2+ XION o | P+ + 2/7 V+ = 1/2+ SIGMA + | | P+ + 1/5 V+ + 2/3 E + N^ = 1/2+ LAMBDA o | + | -------------------------- PROTON + - | | | P+ - 2/7 V+ + PION + - - 1/3 E = ETA o | | P+ - 3/6 V+ - 7/3 E = KAON + - | *------------------------ stable kaon meson stable baryons *------------------------ h^/ Venus + Moon = V- | | P+ + 3/7 V- + = 1/2+ XION o | P+ + 2/7 V- = 1/2+ SIGMA + | | P+ + 1/5 V- - 2/3 E + N^ = 1/2+ LAMBDA o | + | -------------------------- PROTON + - | | | ETA o ... [547.45] MeV FIT | | KAON o ... [493. 677] MeV FIT | | PION + - ... [139.56995] MeV FIT | | *------------------------ stable kaon meson -------------------------------------------- SU(3) SYMMETRIES the ORIGINAL datas -------------------------------------------- Here is a typewritten version, approximating the original calculations that 'discovered' the SU(3) symmetry sets on Christmas Day, 1994. -------------------------------------------- PROTOTYPE -------------------------------------------- h^/(venus mean) 1823.5739767 - P+ = 885.301627671 MASTER UNITS divide by 5 = 177.060325534 to N^ 885.30083767 divide by 6 = 147.550271278 / divide by 7 = 126.471661095 / / / The set of 3 intrinsic ratios in ONE mass element were the discovery ! THESE SUB-FACTORED AS 885.301627671 divide by 5 = 177.060325534 to N^ divide by 6 = 147.550271278 x 4 + 4E = 1530.51739137 x 3 from P+ - N^ + 2/3 E = 497.668844207 divide by 7 = 126.471661095 x 2 = 252.943322191 + P+ - 3 E - 2/3 E = 1189.34196895 WHICH POINTED TO divide by 5 + P+ + 2/3 E = LAMBDA whereas + 1/3 E divided by FSC = N^ = 1.293314692 divide by 6 = Decuplet mass increment units x 4 = approx 3/2+ XION isospin x 3 = KAON FIT (497.677) MeV divide by 7 = Octuplet mass increment units x 2 - E = approximate JUPITER (wave/orbit) = 253.526682297 and 252.943322191 = 2/7 885.301627671 - 147.550271278 (1/6 885.301627671) = 105.393050913 + 1/3 E approximating MUON [105.658389] MeV FIT and 105.393050913 - 2/3 E approximating 5/2 E x FSC when E is .511069562 where it was later learned that the 'NEUTRINO' augmented ELECTRON used for many of the more exact factors in this disclosure, is .511067935 MeV. These datas have been used as a guide, but are not the right stuff. The real derivations occur throughout the SU(3) information, using the above PROTOYPE as a clear cut, self evident image, a road map straight into inner concepts about how to handle and stablize that which is abundantly obvious used in calculating the exact MASS states of many fundamental particles and values of allied fundamental constants. The discovery that the 'Earth Moon Metaphor' system of hooks was linked through common 1/7 1/6 1/5 whole integer ratios was made as a surprise from Santa on Christmas day, 1994. - end of The stable particles of status **** ----------------------------------------------------------------- TOOT! TOOT! The ETA is missing! Not so. It can be shown in the following harmonics. ----------------------------------------------------------------- ETA = [547.45] MeV FIT and where E 1Pi = 1.605350908 MeV h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter) - moon = 392.495086857 MeV - P+ + 10/3 E ...= 547.480553359 MeV h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter) = 392.195215908 MeV - P+ + 8/3 E ...= 547.439758265 MeV h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter) + moon = 391.895802818 MeV - P+ + 6/3 E ...= 547.398505311 MeV also ------------------------------------------------------------- h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter) - moon = 392.495086857 MeV - P+ + E 1Pi ...= 547.382574051 MeV h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter) = 392.195215908 MeV - P+ + E 1Pi - 2/3 E ...= 547.341778957 MeV h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter) + moon = 391.895802818 MeV - P+ + E 1Pi - E ...= 547.470859024 MeV See associated factors and datas at the end of MARS PLAYING TUNES WITH THE PROTON in PART 11. ------- COMMENT ------- The reason for the title TOOT! TOOT! is the ETA was missing, for many years, until a sudden chance calculation on the spur of the moment turned it up as an optical illusion hidden in an unlikely digit combination involving Mars and Jupiter, the facets revealed in an instant at 3 A.M. December 31/94. The only candidates for ETA occurrences prior, were three, in the 555 MeV range. Neither of them in correspondence to current ETA FITS, but all were in a prior range concidered for ETA's by particle physicists. change sign 1/2+ XION 1321.5 - P+ - P+ = 555.0 MeV 5/2 E x FSC - P+ x 1/2 change sign - P+ change sign = 556.6 MeV and also *---- + Earth perihelion) = 557.810463794 MeV | h^/(Mars perihelion + Earth mean) = 553.893584690 MeV | *---- + Earth aphelion) = 550.031329899 MeV - end of TOOT! TOOT! ===================== KAON CIRCLE MULTIPLEX ===================== The basic gist is simple. KAONS masses appear to occur in fluctuations involving 3/2+ SIGMA states ping.ponged through the PROTON by two KAON cohort states that translate through the PROTON's mass energy, into exact KAON masses. The cohort states have no known physical particle counterparts. They are also called 'corollary'. Here is a schematic of the 'fluctuating' interface. KAON SCHEMATIC 1 simplified ---------------- *------- 3/2+ SIGMA 1382.867 | + |============== diff 444.595 MeV | corollary | | | *---------- 3/2+ SIGMA 1378.874 MeV | | | + |================ diff 440.601 MeV | | corollary -------- | -------|----- PROTON 938.27231 MeV | | corollary | - |================ diff 440.601 MeV | | | *---------- KAON + - 497.672 MeV | | | corollary - |============== diff 444.595 MeV | *-------- KAON o 493.677 MeV All of the mass datas shown in the SCHEMATIC turn up elsewhere throughout this disclosure in approximations from one source or another. 3/2+ SIGMA masses are assumed. This may be another particle's mass. There are other particles which have masses in the same range and the so-called SIGMA'S shown in KAON MULTIPLEX may in fact not be SIGMAS at all, if in fact, the fluctuations shown here in KAON CIRCLE MULTIPLEX might not be valid. KAON SCHEMATIC 2 ---------------- (E x 2 Pi) x FSC = 439.981700508 MeV + P+ = 1378.25401050 MeV | | *---------- 3/2+ SIGMA 1378.25401050 MeV | | | + |================ diff 439.981700508 MeV | | -------- | -----|----- PROTON 938.27231 MeV | | | - |================ diff 439.981700508 MeV | | | *---------- KAON + - 498.290609492 MeV | |============== Approximate only, too high for KAON KAON SCHEMATIC 3 ---------------- (E x 2 Pi squared) x FSC = 1382.24327803 MeV | | *---------- 3/2+ SIGMA 1382.24327803 MeV | | | - |================ diff 443.970968030 MeV | | -------- | -----|----- PROTON 938.27231 MeV | | | - |================ diff 443.970968030 MeV | | | *---------- KAON o 494.301341960 MeV | |============== Approximate only, too high for KAON This information involving 2Pi squared and the ELECTRON mass as a power ampilification is cited here and has now been used elsewhere ... in this disclosure. It is one of those kinky little bits of lore that just keeps sleazing around in the consciousness and won't let go. Meybe it is valid. Meybe not. ---------------------- KAON SCHEMATIC SUMMARY ---------------------- In each of the three SCHEMATICS there are no states which correspond to prior calculated SIGMA or KAON entities elsewhere in this disclosure, but do come as close as 5 significant figures here and there. For instance entity KAON o with a mass of 493.626 turns up several times, which approximates 494.302 minus 4/3 E from KAON SCHEMATIC 2. =================== KAON GEOMETRY IMAGE =================== The reason why such searches as the above three SCHEMATICS is undertaken at all, is the chance that there are facets of particle factors which can be pin pointed as fundamentally absolute, a factor such as (E x 2 Pi squared) x FSC is totally unambiguous as to what it's mass energy equivalent should be. On the other hand all the terms equal to (E x 2 Pi) x FCS are not so understood in terms of an image in a mechanical geometry construction, the 2 Pi squared factor is less easily understood by an image, even tho it results from geometry concepts by: PLANE GEOMETRY FEATURES OF A CIRCLE IN ELEMENTARY PARTICLE CONSTRUCTION in which the 2 Pi factor interprets in a geometrical construction as translating a radius vector into a circumpherence, and 2 Pi squared translates into an area for a circle with the original circumpherence expanded by Pi, when the original radius can be a vector mass equal to E x FSC for instance. In this case the area will not be the same as that arrived by radius squared times Pi, as in Pi R squared when the 2nd Pi term effectively substitutes a 2nd R radius for Pi R squared. In the geometry image the expansion factor is 2R (Pi squared), obviously different than the correct Euclidean geometry's Pi R squared. Using the real ELECTRON's rest state mass energy the following derivations for both KAON + - and KAON o particles seems stablized, in which the charged PION is tied to the KAON o mass. The ELECTRON's rest state mass energy is .510999095 MeV and Pi = 3.141592653 a ratio. ============================== THE CLASSICAL ELECTRON RADIUS ============================== KAON SCHEMATIC 4-A kaon geometry image A PLANE GEOMETRY UNDERSTUCTURE -------------------- circumpherence *---------- 3/2+ SIGMA = Diameter x PI squared expanded by Pi | | *----------- 1378.88103895 MeV | | x Pi |==========|===== diff 440.608728950 MeV | -----------------|----- PROTON 938.27231 MeV | Circumpherence |================ diff 440.608728950 MeV | | |---------- 497.663581050 MeV x Pi | ============= | KAON + - [497.672] MeV FIT | | | | Diameter *----- E x FSC x 2 - 2/3 E = 139.709858968 MeV Having determined that a KAON MULTIPLEX is orchestrated according to the mechanical properties of ordinary plane geometry and parameters of an ordinary circle, albeit in non standard way here comes the rest of the construction: KAON SCHEMATIC 4-B Classical Electron Radius Mev kaon geometry image energy equivalent as 'Diameter' ------------------- Mid terms are also involved, in which the 'Classical Electron Radius' is featured as follows: circumpherence *---------- 3/2+ SIGMA = Diameter x PI squared expanded by Pi | | *----------- 1378.88103894 MeV | | |==========|===== diff 438.608728949 MeV | | | -----|-------- PROTON | | | | diff 438.608728949 MeV | | | *----- KAON o 497.663581051 MeV | ============= x PI | | | -----------------|----- PROTON 938.27231 MeV | | 2 x PI |---------- Circumpherence 438.911466569 MeV circumpherence | = 2 PI radius | | Radius *----- E x FSC - 1/3 E = 69.854929484 MeV 'Classical Electron radius' where the 'radius' is the mass energy equivalent of the 'Classical Electron Radius' minus 1/3 the rest state mass of the ELECTRON, = the radius. KAON SCHEMATIC 5-A kaon geometry image PION mass as 'diameter' -------------------- Here goes 2 mechanical derivations, identical to KAON SCHEMATIC 4-A in which the 'Classical Electron radius' was featured as a masked fundamental factor that came to light in KAON SCHEMATIC 4-B. This time, the charged PION particle is the 'masked fundamental factor' in the Diameter and it yields the other KAON. circumpherence *---------- 3/2+ SIGMA 1382.87439160 MeV expanded by Pi | | *----------- | | + |==========|===== diff 444.602081604 MeV | -----------------|----- PROTON 938.27231 MeV | Circumpherence + |================ diff 444.602081604 MeV | | |---------- KAON + - 493.670228396 MeV | | Diameter *----- PION + 4.5936 MeV + E ---------- divide FSC = 140.114470186 MeV where 4.5936 MeV is the mass difference between the charged and neutral stable PION particles for PION + - = 139.56995 MeV FIT PION o = 134.9764 MeV FIT and the DIAMETER of the circle is used to factor the circumpherence which determines another mass, of 493.670228396 MeV which compares favorably with the real KAON o mass 493.677 MeV FIT. KAON SCHEMATIC 5-B kaon geometry image PION mass as 'diameter' ------------------- Mid terms are also involved, in which the 'charged PION particle ' is featured, as follows: circumpherence *----------- 3/2+ SIGMA 1382.87439160 MeV expanded by Pi | | *----------- | | |==========|===== diff 444.602081604 MeV | | | -----|-------- PROTON | | |==========|===== diff 444.602081604 MeV | | | *----- KAON + - 493.670228396 MeV | ============= x PI | | | -----------------|----- PROTON 938.27231 MeV | | x PI |---------- Circumpherence 440.182590198 MeV circumpherence | = 2 PI radius | | Diameter *----- PION + 4.5936 MeV + E ---------- divide FSC = 140.114470186 MeV in which an ELECTRON mass is added to an augmented PION mass to yeild the circle's 'Diameter' where the PION mass is for the charged PION + - = 139.56995 MeV FIT and the TINY mass increment .03352112 MeV is the PION mass difference charged PION - neutral pion = 4.5936 MeV divided by the Fine Structure Constant The same structure is itemized next in a simplified schematic: KAON SCHEMATIC 5-C kaon geometry image Simplified schematic ------------------- circumpherence *---------- 3/2+ SIGMA 1382.87439160 MeV expanded by Pi | | + | PROTON diff = 2 x 444.60281604 | - | | *------ for KAON + - 493.670228396 MeV | | ============= | | | | x PI |==========| | -----------------|----- PROTON 938.27231 MeV | x PI |========== Circumpherence 440.182590198 MeV | = 2 PI radius | | Diameter *----- PION + 4.5936 MeV + E ---------- FSC = 140.114470186 MeV where the PION mass is for the charged PION + - = 139.56995 MeV FIT KAON SCHEMATIC 6 kaon geometry image -------------------- Another, simpler, derivation, comes into the region of the charged stable KAON's mass and also uses the charged stable PION mass as 'Diameter' but without the minute mass increment shown in SCHEMATIC 5-B. The factoring is as follows: circumpherence *---------- 3/2+ SIGMA 1382.54355140 MeV expanded by Pi | | lineal increment + 444.271241400 MeV | *-------- PROTON | | lineal increment - 444.271241400 MeV | | | | - 2/3 3 | | | | approx KAON o = 493.660402556 MeV | | ============= x Pi | | | | |==========| | -----------------|----- PROTON 938.27231 MeV | Circumphr |========== Circumpherence 440.077280490 MeV | = 2 Pi radius x Pi | | Diameter *------ PION + E = 140.080949065 MeV 139.56995 MeV + .510999065 MeV in which a KAON o mass is approximated. KAON REMARK 1 ------------- Mathmeticians of the ilk who explore crunch geometry, and 'STRANGE ATTRACTORS' may get a bit of a charge out of the manner in which the datas depicted in KAON SCHEMATICS 3-6 were acquired. It was a process of renormalizing, doing things over and over again making tiny adjustements to one input value or another, to see what might result. Using just the raw KAON data itself as the real mass FIT values for input did NOT result in anything recognizable. However a note of interest was witnessed, which is that data equation strings worked around and around through a regurgent loop did not close rapidly in onto a constant, when the intention was to find a mass which had the SAME value as both input 'Diameter' and resulting difference, in the lineal INCREMENT above and below the PROTON mass. Here is what I mean. A renormalizing technique was started by using the FIT mass for the neutral KAON, and from that an input mass Diameter was gained with the value 139.708659432 MeV. This Diameter mass was then used as input to run the same equations over and over again, each time coming back to a Diameter mass, which was always discretely different. The former, and new, Diameter masses were added together, and the average taken by dividing by 2. The newest value was then used to run the string over again. Surprisingly, it took many loops for the resulting Diameter mass to start settling into a stable data form, and many loops taken to derive each next new significant digit of accuracy. During the closing, the data results along the way kept bouncing above then below, input, until input started its sudden creeping toward closure at an accelarating pace. Here is an illustration, using the above described renormalizing technique, and the charged KAON mass to start the ball rolling. STAGE 1 startup ------- Let KAON + - = 497.672 MeV FIT P+ + (P+ - KAON o) = 1378.87262 MeV SIGMA divided by Pi squared = Diameter = 139.709005950 MeV when Pi = 3.141592653 ratio and P+ = 938.27231 MeV Proton mass energy. STAGE 2 renormalizing ------- Then 139.709005950 MeV x Pi = 438.908786734 + P+ = 1377.18109673 MeV divided by Pi squared = 139.537618811 MeV = new Diameter added to old Diamter, and divided by 2 = resulting Diameter = 139.623312380 MeV which is clearly departed from the initial Diameter landing noticably BELOW input. In fact, the resulting Diameters tended to bounce around quit a bit at the fourth significant digit until the fourth, then fifth and finally the rest began to close toward an infinately small remains. Eventually, INPUT x Pi, and lineal increment terms arrived closing to a common value seen as 438.11894 4050 for diameter x Pi 438.11894 6026 for plus.minus increment when INPUT diameter homed through 139.45791 215 MeV after dozens of repeated loops in the renormalization process. In the end, this renormalizing seems just an excercise in curiousity, in that the closing term 139.45791 215 MeV does not seem to hook or tie to anything else that is recognizable in physics. It is just random data. Even when looped some more to become 139.457590923 MeV nothing exotic can be seen about it. It just seems to be noise from the gears of mathematics. OVERDRIVE This mathematical short story is presented only in the interest that someone might want to to add the renormalizing technique, or the STRANGE ATTRACTOR behavior, to their collection of math shakers. I applied this particular overdrive to several things, including using the NEUTRON mass instead of the PROTON for the Ping.Pong between the Diameter mass and SIGMA, but saw nothing usable or definative in terms of mass increments based on any fundamental particle or parts. DEFINATIVE Another test, which DID proove definative, was to use the augmented E+^ NEUTRINO value for the ELECTRON mass instead of just E, in the derivatives of masses for KAONS in the SCHEMATICS, to see what would happen, and what did happen was surprising: MAJOR departures resulting from a minor starting mass increment of +^ whose tiny value is just .oooo6887 MeV derived from N^ x 1/FSC squared, as described elsewhere in this disclosure under the buzz word NEUTRINO. It prooved that E, and not E+^ is a valid term. The intent was to see if things got locked tighter together, using the E+^ increment. They certainly didn't. Here is what resulted when E+^ instead of E was used in both SCHEMATICS 4 and 5 when N^ = 1.293318 MeV FIT and NEUTRINO = N^ x 1/FSC so that E + NEUTRINO = .511067935 MeV. KAON SCHEMATIC 7 Circle Geometry ---------------- circumpherence *---------- 3/2+ SIGMA expanded by Pi | | *----------- 1379.06688046 MeV | | |==========|===== diff + 440.794570464 MeV | | x PI | *--------- PROTON | | |==========|===== diff - 440.794570464 MeV | | | | | *--------- KAON 497.477739536 MeV | ============= | no clear tie to | the charged KAON | of 497.672 MeV | | -----------------|----- PROTON 938.27231 MeV | | Circumpherence | x PI |================== 438.970621760 MeV | | Diameter |----- x 2 = 139.728688650 MeV Radius *===== E+^ x FSC - 1/3 E+^ = 69.864344339 MeV Circle Geometry KAON SCHEMATIC 8 --------------- circumpherence *--------- 3/2+ SIGMA 1382.87507133 MeV expanded by Pi | | * | | |==========|===== diff + 444.602761333 MeV | | x PI | *--------- PROTON | | |==========|===== diff - 444.602761333 MeV | | | | | * charged KAON 493.669548667 MeV | ============= | in this case just a | minute reduction to | the KAON + - mass | | | -----------------|----- PROTON 938.27231 MeV | | Circumpherence | x PI |================== 440.182806562 MeV | | | Diameter |===== PION + 4.5936 MeV + E+^ ---------- divide FSC = 140.114539057 MeV where E+^ is the ELECTRON mass, augmented by N^ divided by FSC (Fine Structure Constant) squared. KAON BUBBLES REVISITED ---------------------- Uno momento! Hold the phone. Almost forgot, there may be a library of circle geometries, not just one pair of bubbled PROTON associates. Here is a hint, that prods the idea of a 'library. The HINT is self evident so does not need to be explained. Except that the NEUTRON instead of the PROTON is the intervening Ping.Pong character. NEUTRON Circle Geometry KAON SCHEMATIC 9 ------------------------ circumpherence *--------- 3/2+ SIGMA 1382.24327803 MeV expanded by Pi | | * | | |==========|===== diff + 442.677648030 MeV | | | | x PI | *--------- NEUTRON 939.56563 MeV | | | | |==========|===== diff - 442.677648030 MeV | | | | = 496.887981970 MeV | | | | + N^ - E | | | | = 497.67300905 MeV | | | | | * neutral KAON 497.672 MeV FIT | ================== | in this example a | reduction to KAON | mass is N^ - E | = .782318935 MeV | | -------------|----- NEUTRON 939.56563 MeV | | Circumpherence | x PI |================== 439.981700508 MeV | | | Diameter |----- x 2 = 140.05052501 MeV Radius *===== E x FSC = 70.025262505 MeV electron amplitudes ETA Circle Geometry KAON SCHEMATIC 10 -------------------- circumpherence *--------- expanded by Pi | | * ???? ..... 1332.16367148 MeV | | |==========|===== diff + 392.598041483 MeV | | | | x PI | *--------- NEUTRON | | | | |==========|===== diff - 392.598041483 MeV | | | | = 546.967588517 MeV | | | | + E | | | | = 547.478587582 MeV | | | * stable ETA 547.45 MeV AVERAGE | ============= | | | -------------|----- NEUTRON 939.56563 MeV | | Circumpherence | x PI |================== 424.040866647 MeV | | | Diameter |----- = 134.9764 MeV Radius *===== neutral PION particle KAON REMARK 2 Geometry 'Bubbles' ------------- In the circle geometry scene, the PROTON is a constant, it is just THERE!, and the KAONS form around it, via circle geometry expansions. The same with the NEUTRON. Since the diameters can originate from the ELECTRON itself and the 'Classical Electron Radius', both of which are not actually constants but mutable altho derived from other fundamental constants, the KAON bubbles expanding around the PROTON are variable, they are not finitely concrete in terms of a single mass for each state. Is it possible that different solar systems will have variably different KAON bubbles than ours ? KAON REMARK 3 ------------- In actual wavelengths that which has been deemed the circumpherence expanded by Pi, will actually occur INSIDE a NEUCLEON, not extending to a long distance beyond the PROTON such as does the PION charged particle's Compton wavelength. This is because the Compton wavelength of the SIGMA is obviously shorter than that of the PROTON, except in a circle bubble scene the PROTON is as if wrapped by the other vibrations. KAON REMARK 4 ------------- The concept of plane old fashion circle geometry straight from the pages of Euclid is intriguing indeed as a method to generate and control Ping.Pong relationships between the basic KAON particles, and the PROTON and NEUTRON. Whether the geometry actually works to correctly describe understructure is a mute point in this disclosure. There are in fact many stable KAONS, not just two. Is it possible that the others can be scoped into a venue which has circle gemometry as the principle claim to fame? This disclosure cannot extablish a proof, ie., nothing like new fundamdental physical constancy has been seen in terms as hard copied or stamped in iron, as are the actual Physical Constants published in tables. In several other parts in this disclosure a circle geometry principle is applied as a power amplitude expansion of the ELECTRON whose rest state mass is expanded by 1 PI and 2 PI values, yeilding two circle circumpherences, one when the Radius is E, via 2 PI R, and the other if the Diameter is E, via 1 PI R, or else a semi circle circumpherence is resulted via 1 PI R. It concludes with a cryptic remark: Follow the Kaon masses to the outside day and night. - end of KAON CIRCLE MULTIPLEX - PART 10-A ---------------------------------------------------- BANG BUBBLES ------------------------------------------------------------ =============================== POWER BUBBLES FOR STABLE SIGMAS =============================== One other bubble has turned up! A bubble is found that has a non random sense attached to both the INPUT and END values. These numbers are LARGE so SMALL changes to INPUT values results in MAJOR changes to the END VALUES. In the midst of this, a set of three data links have a constant symmetrical pattern, in the Bang Bubbles that describe them. ----------------------------------------------------------- POWER BUBBLE 0 Decuplet mass unit 148.4 MeV ----------------------------------------------------------- circumpherence *--------- ???? ..... 1727.89610545 MeV expanded by Pi | | * | | |==========|===== diff + 789.623795459 MeV | | | | x PI | *--------- PROTON 939.27231 MeV | | | | |==========|===== diff - 789.623795459 MeV | | | | = 148.648514541 MeV | | ================== | | END VALUE | | | This is h^/(Venus) - moon - P+ x 1/6 | from the Earth Moon Metaphor. | | | What about the 1/7 term from the | Earth Moon Metaphor? | And YES ! it exists! | See immediately below. | | | -------------|----- PROTON 938.27231 MeV | | Circumpherence | x PI |================== 550.006412666 MeV | | | Diameter |----- = 175.072478616 MeV Radius *===== INPUT Power amplitude of 5/2 E^^ x FSC when E^^ = E + E x 1/FSC squared INTRO The prediction ----- In fact, a prediction came. It came about as a chance finding that one of the power bubbles went directly to END VALUE conclusion with the Neutral SIGMA mass. This was work following on the tail end of the Neutral PION power bubble detailed above as the last entry in KAON CIRCLE MULTIPLEX. Spurred on a second bubble was found in which the INPUT term was 175 MeV. A third was quickly found after a frantic look around. 'It' proved to be a mother mode. LET 'it' be the 1/2+ SIGMA o mass energy equivalent. Since 'it' was discovered in use of N^ x FSC as an INPUT term, it instantly turned interesting, because there are two other closely related terms these being TERMS FACTORS INCREMENTS ENTITIES ----- ------- ---------- -------- 1 N^ x FSC + 1/3 E + P+ = 1/2+ LAMBDA 2 N^ x FSC = NEUTRON - PROTON mass difference 3 N^ x FSC - 1/3 E = Link to ELECTRON power amplitude 5/2 E x FSC It hinted something predictable should occur; that (N^ x FSC) - 1/3 E should have a relevant END VALUE. It turns out yes it was the 1/2+ SIGMA - mass. So it was not surprising, in fact predicted, that INPUT (N^ x FSC) + 1/3 E should be that which yeilds an END VALUE equal to the mass of 1/2+ SIGMA + and it turns out it did, right on schedule. There is nothing more pleasantly surprising than finding something that becomes totally predictable as a self evident pattern. When such is seen, doubts just wisk away, as if let loose into the drifting time lines of a planet, detached to drift into the seething red shifts of the evolving universe. In fact it happened that the power bubble for the 1/2+ SIGMA o particle was found first, found upon expectation that something might exist for N^ x FSC, since a power bubble relating to a SU(3) symmetry term for Decuplet particles had just been seen as an END VALUE using ELECTRON power amplification 5/2 E x FSC as INPUT in a power bubble equation. This 1/2+ SIGMA o find can be called CURIOSITY PREDICTION from ACTION 1 input N^ x FSC This surprising find led immediately to PREDICTION which yeilded 1/2+ SIGMA - ACTION 2 from input N^ x FSC - 1/3 E which immediately led to the TOTAL PREDICTION witness of 1/2+ SIGMA + ACTION 3 from input N^ x FSC + 1/3 E Thus it was that the information was found and recorded in a note book by pencil in the space of a few minutes doing equations as fast as data can be entered into a calculator with 12 STORE and RECALL memories. It was in fact only minutes, from start to end to factor and record these datas. It was the fastest explosion of raw new knowledge in the whole of this disclosure. How it came unexpectedly; by following a few CLUES with HUNCHES from INTUITION. How it came unexpectedly is that these POWER BUBBLES are tight, and I mean TIGHT. There is no room anywhere in them to play around, not even by trivial amounts, such as using E+^ as an input term for the ELECTRON. Just the tiny mass difference between E+^ and E can throw the whole picture right of wack so that all of its details simply VANISH! That is how tight these stable SIGMA power bubbles are. In the nicky dorks a number of different ways to conceive a starting value for N^ is possible, but only one value actually results in direct derivations which hit right on to the three different FIT values for the SIGMAS. The N^ data thus used comes staight from the orbit of the EARTH MOON Metaphor, as the (wave/orbit) factor for h^/ (Earth) + moon - P+ divide by 3 in reverse engineering of the bubble equations = 177.387639343 MeV as an INPUT value. LET N^ = 177.387639343 Here are the STABLE SIGMA POWER BUBBLES. ----------------------------------------------------------- POWER BUBBLE 1 1/2+ SIGMA + 1189.37 mEv FIT ----------------------------------------------------------- circumpherence *--------- ???? ..... 1750.74582596 MeV expanded by Pi | | * | | |==========|===== diff + 812.473515962 MeV | | | | x PI | *--------- PROTON 938.27231 MeV | | | | |==========|===== diff - 812.473515962 MeV | | | | = 125.798794038 MeV | | | | x 2 + P+ | | | | = 1189.86989807 MeV | | | | - E | | | | = 1189.3588990 MeV | | | stable 1/2+ SIGMA + 1189.37 MeV FIT | ============= | END VALUE | | | -------------|----- PROTON 938.27231 MeV | | Circumpherence | x PI |================== 557.279045997 MeV | | | Diameter |----- = 177.387639343 MeV = N^ Radius *===== INPUT This term approximates the LAMBDA - PROTON mass difference. ----------------------------------------------------------- POWER BUBBLE 2 1/2+ SIGMA o 1192.55 mEv FIT ----------------------------------------------------------- circumpherence *--------- ???? ..... 1749.06470642 MeV expanded by Pi | | * | | |==========|===== diff + 810.792396422 MeV | | | | x PI | *--------- PROTON | | | | |==========|===== diff - 810.792396422 MeV | | | | = 127.479913578 MeV | | | | x 2 + P+ | | | | = 1193.23213715 MeV | | | | - E - 1/3 E | | | | = 1192.55080507 MeV | | | stable 1/2+ SIGMA o 1192.55 MeV FIT | ============= | END VALUE | | | -------------|----- PROTON 938.27231 MeV | | Circumpherence | x PI |================== 556.744587629 MeV | | | Diameter |----- = 177.21730632 MeV Radius *===== INPUT N^ - 1/3 E ----------------------------------------------------------- POWER BUBBLE 3 1/2+ SIGMA - 1197.436 mEv FIT ----------------------------------------------------------- circumpherence *--------- ???? ..... 1747.38356881 MeV expanded by Pi | | * | | |==========|===== diff + 809.111276882 MeV | | | | x PI | *--------- PROTON | | | | |==========|===== diff - 809.111276882 MeV | | | | = 129.161033118 MeV | | | | x 2 + P+ | | | | = 1196.59437623 MeV | | | | + E + 2/3 E | | | | = 1197.44604134 MeV | | | stable 1/2+ SIGMA o 1197.436 MeV FIT | ============= | END VALUE | | | -------------|----- PROTON 938.27231 MeV | | | Circumpherence | x PI |================== 556.209470660 MeV | | Diameter |----- = 177.046973300 MeV Radius *===== INPUT N^ - 2/3 E This term interfaces with power amplitude 5/2 E x FSC POWER COMMENT 1 --------------- The above three power bubbles have been built upon the importance attached to the three INPUT terms INPUT diameter = 177.21730632 MeV DIFF 1/3 E = .17033302 mEv INPUT diameter = 177.21730632 MeV DIFF 1/3 E = .17033302 mEv INPUT diameter = 177.046973300 MeV These are all power amplifications of N^ x FSC and have been identified in several places elsewhere in the disclosure as links to other fundamental occurrences in the following ways: LET N^ = 1.293323416 MeV FIT Neutron - Proton mass difference determined in 'Cooking The Books' under A MASS FOR THE NEUTRINO in PART 9. AND SO N^ x FSC = 177.231854069 MeV which hooks into the following algorythm: Math in ascending order =========================================================== [1115.684] MeV FIT 1/2+ LAMBDA (1115.678) MeV best experiment ============== = 1115.67452004 MeV + P+ = 177.402210047 MeV + 1/3 E+^ .......... 177.231854069 MeV .............. - 1/3 E+^ = 177.061498090 MeV - N^ - E+^ - 1/3 E+^ = 175.08670759 MeV = 5/2 E+^ x FSC for E+^ = .511067935 MeV whereas .......... 5/2 E+^ x FSC is also = 175.08670759 MeV due to 'Cooking the Books' under 'A Mass For The Neutrino'. =========================================================== Math in descending order The point being made is that the three SIGMA Power Bubbles are not just there hanging around ringing a few bells with silly singsongs from the carilons of a national parliament building during noon hours. The stable SIGMA's Power Bubbles are a parliament building, in my opinion. POWER REMARK 1 -------------- This set of 3 stable SIGMA power bubbles, catches the essence of the EARTH MOON Metaphor in yet another way through the interdimensional media of N^ x Pi. As follows: FLUTTER AND DRIFT =================== 177.387639343 557.279704598 change sign 1/2+ XION range N^ x Pi - P+ - P+ - 1/3 E = 1319.09458238 MeV = h^/ 1.495928009 x 10 to 13 cm Earth - earth radius - moon radius 177.21730632 556.744587630 change sign N^ - 1/3 E x Pi - P+ - P+ - 1/3 E - 1 E = 1319.11870028 MeV = h^/ 1.495972451 x 10 to 13 cm Earth - earth radius + moon radius 177.04697330 556.209470660 change sign N^ - 2/3 E x Pi - P+ - P+ - N^ = 1319.04183133 MeV = h^/ 1.495987834 x 10 to 13 cm Earth orbit - 1/2 moon radius to stretch it a bit POWER REMARK 2 -------------- By now, the concept of 'circle geometry' has evolved into power bubbles, for critical INPUT and END value harmonics. Those under the KAON CIRCLE MULTIPLEX are obvious enough. But what about others ? Should there be more ? How common is this, if it is a phenomenon ? It turns out that the phenomenon is V E R R R Y uncommon. In round figures, there are only a few candidates for INPUT terms able to yield power bubble facts. Close by the mass of PIONS there is only the MUON, with a rest mass of 105.6 MeV. Then of course the KAONS, with rest masses of 493.7 MeV and 497.7 MeV respectively. At 175 MeV, is Electron power amplification 175.06 MeV, and Neutron-Proton mass difference N^ as a power amplification to 177.23 MeV. There is also the stable ETA at 547.5 MeV And finally, there are SU(3) increments specified elsewhere as 126.5 MeV Octuplet 148.0 MeV Decuplet. Why spell out these figures now? Because all of them, turn up in only ONE set of power bubbles, in which the three charge states of the stable 1/2+ SIGMA particles are achieved at once. The MUON is a no show. The power bubbles start with the neutral PION mass as illustrated above in KAON SCHEMATIC 10. The power bubbles (at least in the phenomena formulas used in this disclosure) end at the LAMBDA-PROTON mass difference of 177.4 MeV. ===================== Spoke too S O O N ! ===================== Does doggie want a B O N E ? Take down the sign in the supermarket which says 'this lane not interactive with cash'. Here it is ! A bang bubble for the MUON ! Yes it is here. In an unlikely place. Woke up in the morning with a single simple idea and gave it a try and THERE were the glad pies. The seeking peeking mind had figured that .782 MeV should be holded up in these bang ping.pongs somewhere and it turns out to be there all along, but not in actual Ping.Pongs. The mass is so high suddenly that two PROTON masses are now active not by intervening terms added and subtracted into one PROTON. The insight was simple enough, coming down the stairs at 9:30 AM after hard at work until 4:30 AM proof reading the draft all the way through the MUON CIRCLE GEOMETRY surfing to the end of its bang bubbles double checking every figure and first thing waking up, groggily heading down the stairs into the dining room with a dim idea to try on the calculator beside the computer, and bingo ! The idea was that since (so I have heard) the MUON always occurs in pairs, why not try TWICE the MUON mass in a bang bubble and see what happens. What happened was found the instant the first equation was tried. Twice the MUON mass for INPUT, produced twice a known mass bundle as the END VALUE. This is an INPUT mass in the order of 211 MeV. And an END VALUE mass in the order of 209 MeV. As already said: The simple idea was in reasoning that the MUON, and two related power ampilfication (FSC) terms close to its value, should find room in the balloons of bang bubbles. These other two are 105 MeV for 3/2 E x FSC, and 107 MeV for (N^ - E) x FSC. Nothing for these values tried before in bang bubble format had even come close. The idea was to try T W O Muons for INPUT and see what the END result would be. It turned out to be right on the money. Everything in that price range (106 MeV) fits right. Here are the price ranges: 1 3/2 E x FSC = 105.037893758 MeV when E = .510999086 MeV FIT 2 MUON = 105.658389 MeV FIT 3 N^ - E = .782318935 MeV x FSC = 107.205849362 MeV when N^ = 1.293318 MeV FIT In the following algorythms: 1 INPUT yeilds 3 END VALUE 2 INPUT yeilds 1 END VALUE 3 INPUT yeilds 3 END VALUE in which both the INPUT and END VALUES are twice the price of one. Here are the new bang bubble demonstrations: ==================== THE MUON BANG BUBBLE ==================== *------------|-------- = 2085.61300217 MeV | | | | - 2 P+ | | x Pi | 1 | = 209.068382172 MeV | | | | = 2 x | | E + (1+1/2 E x 1/FSC) = E+ | | E+ x 3/2 x FSC | | | | for E = .511034759 MeV | | END VALUE | ========= | | | | ----|-------- PROTON 938.27231 MeV | | x 2 Pi | 2 | | *--- MUON = 105.658389 MeV INPUT ===== In reverse engineering, starting with E the reverse bang bubble equation string When E+ = E + (1+1/2 E x 1/FSC) then 2 x ((3/2 E+ x FSC) - E+) + 2 P+ divide by 2 Pi squared equals 2 x MUON = 105.658 495681 MeV --------------- 1/99.999 8990 % 105.658 389 MeV FIT SUMMARY ======= The MUON and power amplified ELECTRON are tied together in a bang bubble, but not the N^ mass difference term for the Neutron - Proton, it misses the MUON. This stands to reason in that the ELECTON and MUON are members of the same particle family called the LEPTONS. =================== THE N^ BANG BUBBLE =================== *------------|-------- = 2093.53835152 MeV | | | | - 2 P+ | | x Pi | 3 | = 216.993731528 MeV | | | | = 2 x ((N^ - E) x FSC)) | | | | equals 2 x (.782302139 x FSC) | | | | + N^ | | | | for N^ = 1.293301204 MeV | | END VALUE | ========= | | | ----|-------- PROTON 938.27231 MeV | | x 2 Pi | 1 | | *--- 3/2 E x FSC = 105.037893758 MeV + 2 E INPUT ===== In reverse engineering, starting with N^ the reverse bang bubble equation string 2 x ((N^ + (N^ - E x FSC)) + 2 P+ divide by 2 Pi squared, equals E 'power amplitude' = 2 E + (3/2 E x FSC) for (3/2 E x FSC) = .511000199 MeV. NOTE when the equation string for this bang bubble is run foward or backward using 2 times the NEUTRON mass instead of the PROTON, the incremental + N^ term at the END VALUE drops out completely which is to be expected. ====================================== THE E 'POWER AMPLITUDE' BANG BUBBLE ====================================== Using INPUT term N^ = 1.293301204 factored above in THE N^ BANG BUBBLE *------------|-------- = 2090.89541939 MeV | | | | - 2 P+ | | x Pi | 3 | = 214.351799394 MeV | | | | = 2 x ((N^ - E) x FSC)) | | | | equals 2 x (.782302139 x FSC) | | | | for N^ = 1.293099446 MeV | | END VALUE | ========= | | | ----|-------- PROTON 938.27231 MeV | | | x 2 Pi |================ | | 3 = 211.852100086 MeV | x 2 | - 5/2 E *--- N^ - E x FSC = 107.203547705 MeV INPUT ===== In reverse engineering, starting with N^ the reverse bang bubble equation string when N^ = 1.293301204 MeV 2 x ((N^ - E) x FSC) + 2 P+ divide by 2 Pi squared, + 5/2 E = 107.206349034 MeV x 1/FSC = .78232258 MeV + E = 1.293321646 NOTE Implicit in all calculations in which N^ - E is a factor, is that this term is a mass difference for the NEUTRON - PROTON minus the ELECTRON ! and so is assumed to hold the NEUTRINO ! somehow hidden. P.S. The remark about 'this lane not interactive with cash' happens to be a true story. The local supermarket had a sign today in one of its cash isles. I wasn't sure if this is the new age speaking, or that its 2 owners are French with most of its customers French also but the whole of its signs are in english. Sure looked like a weird sign though, sitting upright at the end of the black rubber drive belt that brings your groceries forward to the cashier. Jan. 14/95 - end of PART 10-A Bang Bubbles - PART 11 ------------------------------------------------------ DESCRIPTIONS ------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------- THE KAON BOX OF FLUCTUATING WAVELENGTHS ----------------------------------------------- COMMENT This section compliments 'Kaon circle multiplex' of PART 10 but does not duplicate the derivations. It is obvious that the following 'derivations' of Charged and Neutral KAON particle mass states is very simplistic concidering the esoteric tight mass ranges of the KAONS involving numerous lifetimes and other variables including parity CP-symmetry violations. Hum Hmmmm. FRACTURED WAVELENGTHS In spite of this, the following 'Compton wave' derivations are shown, expecting that insights may be generated from the IMAGES of bits and pieces of Compton wavelengths, bound systematically in precise sets of lineally summed (wave/orbit) harmonics. Shown are a total of 10 (wave/orbit) harmonics for KAON states; five Hyperwaves, and 5 subwaves. HYPERWAVES are SETS, that is, (wave/orbits) which have symmetrical mechanical operators, for instance; + Moon and - Moon increments in a revealing image. SUBWAVES are singles, that is, not embodied in a SET. ----------------------------------------------- HYPERWAVES a SET of (earth/venus) eccentricic fluctuations for the CHARGED KAON ----------------------------------------------- h^/(1/2 (Earth mean + Venus perihelion) + MOON) yields K1 K1 - P+ x 4/3 - P+ - 2/3 E = KAON +- 493.679531034 MeV change sign h^/ 1/2 (Earth mean + Venus mean) yields K2 K2 - P+ x 4/3 - P+ - 1/3 E = KAON +- 493.696573681 MeV change sign h^/(1/2 (Earth mean + Venus aphelion) - MOON) yields K3 K3 - P+ x 4/3 - P+ - 0/3 E = KAON +- 493.713575384 MeV change sign A slight variable drift in the MeV masses is very evident due to the idea that the wave/orbit factors are 'stamped in iron', they have been 'used' as fixed constants. The above SET of HYPERWAVES have three solar mechanical (orbit/wave) IMAGES as follow: ------------------- IMAGE 1 KAON + - ------------------- SUMMER POSITIONS WINTER POSITIONS Earth 1/2 SUN Venus perihelion .---*---.---------------------!------------*-----------* + moon moon - *........................|........................* *----|------------------------* has + Moon K1 hyperwave Earth 1/2 SUN Venus mean .---*---.-----------------------!------------*-------------* + moon moon - *..........................|..........................* *--------------------------* K2 hyperwave Earth 1/2 SUN Venus aphelion .---*---.------------------------!------------*---------------* + moon moon - *...|........................|............................* *------------------------* has - Moon K3 hyperwave --------------------------------------------- SUBWAVE 1 KAON + - for VENUS + EARTH --------------------------------------------- -- all in one -- h^/(1/2 (Venus mean + Earth mean - Moon)) yields K4 K4 - P+ x 4/3 - P+ + 3E = KAON +- 493.685467502 MeV ------------------- IMAGE 2 KAON + - ------------------- Earth 1/2 SUN Venus mean .---*---.--------------------!------------*---------------* + moon moon - *...,.................................................* *--------------------* K4 subwave ------------------------------------------------- SUBWAVES (wave/orbit) eccentricic fluctuations for the NEUTRAL KAON state ------------------------------------------------- h^/(1/2 (Earth mean + Venus aphelion) yields K,1 K,1 - P+ x 4/3 - P+ + E = KAON o 497.639065537 MeV change sign h^/(Mars aphelion + Earth perihelion) yields K,3 K,3 - 1/2 E = KAON o 497.640462396 MeV note -- all in one -- h^/(Mars aphelion + Earth perihelion + Moon) yields K,2 K,2 + 1/2 E = KAON o 497.669009517 MeV note NOTE singular characteristic is + and - incremental units of 1/2 E associated with the two MARS \ EARTH wave/orbit interlinks. '-- all in one --' specifies a particular characteristic that: certain wave harmonics are at work when a moon orbit is incremented upon a FULL sum wave combination. In other cases the moon orbit increments upon the 1/2 wave combination. This slight seeming difference in mode of moon orbit incrementalion, can make or break resulting hit on an exact MeV per calculated mass state or resonance. ----------------- IMAGE 1 KAON o ----------------- Earth 1/2 SUN Venus mean .---*---.--------------------!----------*-----------.----*----. + moon moon - P A *------------------------,................................* K,1 subwave Mars SUN Earth perihelion .---*---.-------------------*---------------.------*------. A P - A P *---------------------------------------------------------* K,2 subwave Mars SUN Earth perihelion .---*---.-------------------*---------------.------*---,--.--, A P - A P - moon + moon *------------------------------------------------------------* K,3 subwave --------------------------------------------------- HYPERWAVES a set of (wave/orbit) eccentricic fluctuations for both KAON states --------------------------------------------------- -- all in one -- h^/(Mars aphelion + Earth aphelion - Moon) yields K,4 K,4 + 3 E = KAON + - 493.693301635 MeV [493.677] FIT -- all in one -- h^/(Mars aphelion + Earth perihelion + Moon) yields K,5 K,5 + 1/2 E = KAON o 497.669009519 MeV [497.672] FIT ------------------- IMAGE 2 KAON SET ------------------- SUMMER WINTER Mars SUN Earth .---*---.--------------------*---------------.--------*---,---.---, A P P A - moon + moon aphelion perihelion perihelion aphelion *---------------------------------------------------------* K,4 hyperwave KAON +- 493.6933 MeV + 3 E Mars SUN Earth .---*---.----------------------*---------,---.---,----*-------. A P P A - moon + moon aphelion perihelion perihelion aphelion *------------------------------------------------* K,5 hyperwave KAON o 497.6690 MeV - 1/2 E --------------------------------------------------- ANOTHER KAON HYPERWAVE PAIR has turned up involving MARS and MERCURY --------------------------------------------------- 1/2 Mars | SUN Mercury *--------------------------.---|---.------*-------------------* - moon + moon |..........................| |..............................| |..................................| ---- - MOON h^/1/2 (Mars + Mercury) + moon = 1376.92923236 MeV ---- 3/2+ SIGMA range - P+ - P+ - E x Pi - 2/3 E = 497.669370680 MeV = KAON + - [497.672] MeV FIT ---- 0 MOON h^/1/2 (Mars + Mercury) = 1380.63252130 MeV ---- 3/2+ SIGMA range - P+ - P+ + E x Pi + 1/3 E = 497.687782627 MeV = KAON + - [497.672] MeV FIT - P+ - P+ - E x Pi - 4/3 E = 493.625415707 MeV = KAON o [497.672] MeV FIT ---- + MOON h^/1/2 (Mars + Mercury) - moon = 1384.35578415 MeV ---- 3/2+ SIGMA range - P+ - P+ - E x Pi - 1/3 E = 493.623853734 MeV = KAON o [493.672] MeV FIT NOTE 1 E difference between + MOON string and 0 MOON string. NOTE 1/3 E change from addition to subtraction between 0 MOON string and - MOON string. - end of KAON BOX - ================================================== MARS PLAYING TUNES WITH THE PROTON ================================================== Here are three MARS related PROTON (wave/orbit) resonances. These resonances are PURE. That is there are no + - increments upon any of the major orbit lineal sums. One is a direct MARS + VENUS modelled interaction with 5/2 the ELECTRON mass directly. The other is a 1/2 MARS + EARTH hyperwave connecting to N^ = the (Neutron-Proton) mass difference. The second is the orbit of MARS itself, modelling the 5/2 ELECTRON power amplitude 5/2 E times the FSC (Fine Structure Constant) and in oscillation with the PROTON. The 1/2 MARS + EARTH hyperwave has already been itemized as HANDSHAKE 4 under THE EARTH MOON METAPHOR FOR SUBATOMIC PHENOMENA in PART 9. The three MARS related PROTON (wave/orbit) oscillating harmonics can be imaged as follows: --------- IMAGE 0-m MAIN IMAGE Three MARS - PROTON oscillations --------- 1/2 wave | Mars | Sun Venus Earth *----------------------------------- * -------------*--------* | |............................!------------------------------ | | | | 1-m |............................| | | 2-m |....................................| | 3-m |...................................................| --------- IMAGE 1-m PROTON + (N^ - E x FSC) OSCILLATION --------- 1/2 wave | Mars | Sun Venus Earth *----------------------------------- * -------------*--------* | |..........................| = 1045.33350825 Mev = Mx which has inner correspondence with the Proton in the following manner: 1045.33350825 Mev - PROTON = 107.061198257 MeV 107.06119621 MeV divided by FSC = .781263364 MeV + ELECTRON = 1.292262429 MeV = N^ where N^ approximates the (Neutron - Proton) mass difference such that (PROTON + 1.292262420 MeV) = 939.56 4572420 MeV = approx. NEUTRON = [939.56563] MeV FIT --------- IMAGE 2-m PROTON - (E x FSC) OSCILLATION MARS ORBIT ITSELF --------- Mars Sun Venus Earth *----------------------------------- * -------------*--------* | | |....................................| = 865.693492707 Mev = My which has inner correspondence with the Proton in the following manner: h^/ (Mars) = 865.693492707 Mev = My (My - P+) = 72.578817292 MeV - 5 E = 70.024611967 MeV x 1/FSC = .5109 88552 MeV ELECTRON .510999065 MeV In reverse engineering h^/ (P+ - (E x FSC + 5 E)) = 2.27941186 x 10 to 13 cm 2.279410149 accuracy ratio ------------ 99.999 8335 % 2.279413942 mars orbit --------- IMAGE 3-m PROTON - 2 x (5/2 E x FSC) OSCILLATION --------- Mars Sun Venus Earth *----------------------------------- * -------------*--------* | | |...................................................| = 587.020864299 Mev = Mz which has inner correspondence with the Proton in the following manner: h^/ (Mars + Venus) = 587.020864299 Mev = Mz 1/2 (Mz - P+) = 175.625722850 MeV - E x 1/FSC x 2/5 = .511150740 MeV ELECTRON .510999065 MeV -------------------------------------- HORIZONTAL VRS VERTICAL LINEAL PICTURE -------------------------------------- --------- IMAGE 4-m SUMMARY IMAGE Three MARS - PROTON oscillations --------- 1/2 wave | Mars | Sun Venus Earth *----------------------------------- * -------------*--------* | |............................!------------------------------ | | | | 1-m |..... wave - PROTON ........| | | 2-m |..... PROTON - wave ................| | 3-m |..... PROTON - wave ...............................| ----------- PICTURE 4-1 Rough Drafts ----------- | P+ + | N^ - E x FSC = h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Earth) | | -------|---------------------------------- PROTON | | P+ - | E x FSC + 5 E = h^/ (Mars) | P+ - | 2 x (5/2 E x FSC + E) = h^/ (Mars + Venus) | | | ----------- PICTURE 4-2 ----------- | P+ + | 107.205849362 MeV = 1045.47894936 MeV | | -------|------------------------------------ PROTON | | P+ - | 70.024611967 MeV + 5 E = 865.693492707 MeV | P+ - | 2 x (175.063156264 MeV + E) = 587.020864299 MeV | | | ================================================== MARS GIGGIES CONTINUE ================================================== MARS IN FACT, IS A REAL BUSY BODY ================================================== Here is a quick schematic of MARS oscillations and 'flutters' all of which have been spelled out in details in other parts of this disclosure --------- IMAGE 5-m MASTER IMAGE --------- 1/2 waves (Mars + Mercury) | (Mars + Earth) (Mars + Venus) | (Mars itself) is a full wave | (Mars + Jupiter) | | | Mars | SUN Mercury Venus Earth Jupiter *--------------------- * -------.-*-.------.-*-.----.-*-. ---------.-*-. | - | + - | + - | + + | - | | | | | | | | | m1 |..............| ...................................................| m2 | ....................................| m3 | ................| m4 | .....| m5 |.................................| m6 |............................................| m7 |.....................................................| m8 |......................| Mars itself ---------------- MASTER IMAGES 1 MARS FACTORS ----------------- ==================================================================== where E 1Pi means ELECTRON mass times Pi and x 1/FSC means divided by the Fine Structure Constant and - P+ - P+ explicitely includes a 'change sign' because these are PROTON Ping.Pongs. ==================================================================== MARS AND MERCURY yields 1/2+ SIGMA 3/2+ SIGMA KAONS ================================================================= - moon - P+ - P+ + E 2Pi + 5/3 E = 1/2+ SIGMA 1+1/3 E h^/(Mars + Mercury) - P+ - P+ + E 1Pi + 9/3 E = 1/2+ SIGMA 1+1/3 E + moon - P+ - P+ + E 0Pi + 13/3 E = 1/2+ SIGMA ================================================================= - moon no factors = 3/2+ SIGMA h^/1/2 (Mars + Mercury) no factors = 3/2+ SIGMA for other Kaon = 3/2+ SIGMA + moon no factors = 3/2+ SIGMA ================================================================= DATAS SHOWN IN TABLES BELOW - moon - P+ - P+ + E 1Pi - 1/3 E = KAON o h^/1/2 (Mars + Mercury) - P+ - P+ - E 1Pi - 4/3 E = KAON + - - P+ - P+ + E 1Pi + 1/3 E = KAON o + moon - P+ - P+ - E 1P1 - 2/3 E = KAON + - ================================================================= NOTE One E increment separates each of the KAON o and KAON o and the KAON + - and KAON + - ------------------------------- ================================================================= MARS AND VENUS yields N^ ================================================================= - moon - P+ x 1/2 + E 1Pi + 2/3 E x 1/FSC = N^ h^/ (Mars + Venus) - P+ x 1/2 + E 1Pi x 1/FSC = N^ + moon - P+ x 1/2 + E 1Pi - 2/3 E x 1/FSC = N^ ================================================================= NOTE h^/ 1/2 (wave inputs) do not yield recognizable terms ------------------------------- ================================================================= MARS AND EARTH yields N^ - E ================================================================= - moon - P+ - N^ - 4/3 E x 1/FSC + E = N^ h^/1/2 (Mars + Earth) - P+ + 1/3 E x 1/FSC + E = N^ + moon - P+ + N^ + 2 E x 1/FSC + E = N^ ================================================================= NOTE h^/ (full wave inputs) do not yield recognizable terms ------------------------------- ================================================================= MARS AND EARTH yields N^ - E with + and - E 1Pi ================================================================= - moon - P+ - E 1Pi + 4/3 E x 1/FSC + E = N^ - 1 E h^/1/2 (Mars + Earth) - P+ + 1/3 E x 1/FSC + E = N^ - 2/3 E + moon - P+ + E 1Pi - 2/3 E x 1/FSC + E = N^ ================================================================= NOTE h^/ (full wave inputs) do not yield recognizable terms ------------------------------- ================================================================= MARS itself yields E x FSC power amplitude assocated with Classical Electron Radius ================================================================= - moon - P+ - E 1Pi + E x 1/FSC = E h^/ (Mars) - P+ - N^ - E 1Pi + 2/3 E x 1/FSC = E + moon - P+ - N^ - E 2Pi + E x 1/FSC = E ================================================================= ------------------------------- ================================================================= 1/2 MARS itself A SPREAD OF RANGES ================================================================= 1/2 (Mars) - moon - P+ - P+ + 2/3 E = PION + - 1/2 (Mars - moon) - P+ - P+ h^/ 1/2 (Mars) - P+ - P+ See below under data for this version for 1/2 (Mars + moon) - P+ - P+ more details. 1/2 (Mars) + moon - P+ - P+ ================================================================= subset ---------------------------------------------------------------- 1/2 (Mars) - moon - P+ - P+ + 2/3 E = PION + - 1/2 (Mars - moon) - P+ - P+ - 2 N^ = PION + - subset ---------------------------------------------------------------- 1/2 (Mars) - moon - P+ - P+ + N^ - E x 1/FSC x 1/2 = ELECTRON 1/2 (Mars - moon) - P+ - P+ - N^ - 5/3 E x 1/FSC x 1/2 = ELECTRON subset --------------------------------------------------------------- 1/2 (Mars) - moon - P+ - P+ + E 1Pi - 2/3 E x 1/FSC x 1/2 = ELECTRON ===================================================================== ------------------------------- ================================================================= MARS AND JUPITER yields stable ETA ================================================================= - moon - P+ + 10/3 E = ETA o + 2/3 h^/1/2 (Mars + Jupiter) - P+ + 8/3 E = ETA o + 2/3 + moon - P+ + 6/3 E = ETA o also ----------------------------------------------------------------- note this is the only derived set which show high Electron sums this set is included, because of the degree of consistency in high electron units. ================================================================= NOTE h^/ (inputs) yields recognizable terms in the form of 1/2 the MeV of strings of the h^/ 1/2 (inputs) which means that the ETAS are tightly boxed in by the PROTON's MeV. ------------------------------- ================================================================= - moon - P+ + N^ + 2/3 E = ETA o h^/1/2 (Mars + Jupiter) - P+ + N^ + 1/2 E - 1/3 E = ETA o + moon - P+ + N^ - 1/3 E = ETA o also ------------------------------------------------------------- h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter - moon) - P+ + N^ + 1/2 E = ETA o h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter) - P+ + N^ + 1/2 E - 1/3 E = ETA o h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter + moon) - P+ + N^ + 1/2 E - 2/3 E = ETA o ================================================================= ------------------------------- See under TOOT! TOOT! the ETA is Missing, in PART 11, for similar data details. ================================================================= ---------------- MASTER IMAGES 2 MARS DATAS ----------------- ================================================================== NEXT ARE THE SAME 'FACTS' AS SYMBOLIZED IN MARS FACTORS ABOVE. ================================================================== IT IS THE SAME INFORMATION, IN THE FORM OF DATAS. ================================================================== where E 1Pi ELECTRON times Pi = 1.605350908 MeV and 1/FSC for Fine Structure Constant = 1/137.0359895 and - P+ - P+ when PROTON mass = 938.27231 MeV Explicitely includes a 'change sign' because these are PROTON Ping.Pongs ================================================================== MARS AND MERCURY yields 1/2+ SIGMA 3/2+ SIGMA KAONS ================================================================= 1/2+ SIGMA ====================================================== - moon - P+ - P+ + E 2Pi + 5/3 E = 1189.36116397 MeV 1+1/3 E h^/(Mars + Mercury) - P+ - P+ + E 1Pi + 9/3 E = 1189.36670745 MeV 1+1/3 E + moon - P+ - P+ + E 0Pi + 13/3 E = 1189.36975420 MeV 3/2 + SIGMA ===================================================== - moon = 1384.35578415 MeV h^/1/2 (Mars + Mercury) = 1380.63252130 MeV for other Kaon = 1382.91920429 MeV + moon = 1376.92923236 MeV KAONS =========================================================== - moon - P+ - P+ + E 1Pi - 1/3 E = 493.623853734 MeV h^/1/2 (Mars + Mercury) - P+ - P+ - E 1Pi - 4/3 E = 493.625415701 MeV - P+ - P+ + E 1Pi + 1/3 E = 497.689362627 MeV + moon - P+ - P+ - E 1P1 - 2/3 E = 497.669370680 MeV ================================================================= NOTE One E increment separates each of the KAON o and KAON o and the KAON + - and KAON + - ------------------------------- ================================================================= MARS AND VENUS yields N^ ================================================================= - moon - P+ x 1/2 + E 1Pi + 2/3 E x 1/FSC = 1.293351587 MeV h^/ (Mars + Venus) - P+ x 1/2 + E 1Pi x 1/FSC = 1.293317721 MeV + moon - P+ x 1/2 + E 1Pi - 2/3 E x 1/FSC = 1.293278254 MeV ================================================================= NOTE h^/ (full wave inputs) do not yield recognizable terms ------------------------------- ================================================================= MARS AND EARTH yields N^ - E ================================================================= - moon - P+ - N^ - 4/3 E x 1/FSC + E = 1.293418038 MeV h^/1/2 (Mars + Earth) - P+ + 1/3 E x 1/FSC + E = 1.293505410 MeV + moon - P+ + N^ + 2 E x 1/FSC + E = 1.293656045 MeV ================================================================= NOTE h^/ (full wave inputs) do not yield recognizable terms ------------------------------- ================================================================= MARS AND EARTH yields N^ - E with + and - E 1Pi ================================================================= (Mars + Earth - moon) - P+ - E 1Pi + 4/3E x 1/FSC + E = 1.293294269 MeV - 1 E h^/1/2 (Mars + Earth) - P+ + 1/3E x 1/FSC + E = 1.293505410 MeV - 2/3 E (Mars + Earth + moon) - P+ + E 1Pi - 2/3E x 1/FSC + E = 1.293732366 MeV ================================================================= NOTE h^/ (inputs) do not yield recognizable terms ------------------------------- Tiny downward data drift in the N^ values is noticed. ================================================================= MARS itself yields E x FSC = 70.025262505 MeV power amplitude assocated with Classical Electron Radius ================================================================= - moon - P+ - E 1Pi + E x 1/FSC = .510975906 MeV h^/ (Mars) - P+ - N^ - E 1Pi + 2/3 E x 1/FSC = .510966605 MeV + moon - P+ - N^ - E 2Pi + E x 1/FSC = .511130318 MeV ================================================================= + moon - P+ - 2N^ - E 1Pi + 1/3 E x 1/FSC = .510921372 MeV which differes from E FIT .510999065 by roughly N^ x 1/FSC squared = .oooo77692 MeV which is a power amplitude reduced term suggested elsewhere as a candidate for a NEUTRINO mass. (Fudged, in that the NEUTRINO is slightly lower in MeV). ------------------------------- ================================================================= 1/2 MARS itself A SPREAD OF RANGES ================================================================= 1/2 (Mars) - moon - P+ - P+ + 2/3 E = PION + - = 139.638896610 MeV 1/2 (Mars - moon) - P+ - P+ / = 142.234461588 MeV / h^/ 1/2 (Mars) - P+ - P+ range ..... = 145.159214586 MeV \ 1/2 (Mars + moon) - P+ - P+ balloon \ = 148.074119551 MeV 1/2 (Mars) + moon - P+ - P+ \ = 150.979226141 MeV ================================================================= If there is anything here worth keeping. It is a range, between approximate DECUPLET mass interval unit (147 MeV), and the PION. ------------------------------- Also alludes to BALLOON resonances 147 MeV which come from 1/6 of h^/ (Venus) + - moon = 3/2- XION ================================================================= subset ---------------------------------------------------- 1/2 (Mars) - moon - P+ - P+ + 2/3 E = PION + - = 139.6 38895510 MeV 1/2 (Mars - moon) - P+ - P+ - 2 N^ = PION + - = 139.6 46245588 MeV subset ---------------------------------------------------- 1/2 (Mars) - moon - P+ - P+ + N^ - E x 1/FSC x 1/2 = Electron = .5111 08614 MeV 1/2 (Mars - moon) - P+ - P+ - N^ - 5/3 E x 1/FSC x 1/2 = Electron = .5111 35428 MeV subset --------------------------------------------------- 1/2 (Mars) - moon - P+ - P+ + E 1Pi - 2/3 E x 1/FSC x 1/2 = Electron = .511004140 MeV ==================================================================== ------------------------------- ================================================================= MARS AND JUPITER stable ETA datas ==================================================================== h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter) - moon = 545.778013142 MeV - P+ + 10/3 E ...= 547.480553359 MeV h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter) = 546.077884092 MeV - P+ + 8/3 E ...= 547.439758265 MeV h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter) + moon = 546.377297181 MeV - P+ + 6/3 E ...= 547.398505311 MeV also ---------------------------------------------------------------- h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter) - moon = 545.778013142 MeV - P+ + N^ + 2/3 E ...= 547.411207185 MeV h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter) = 546.077884092 MeV - P+ + N^ + 1/2 E - 1/3 E ...= 547.455578602 MeV h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter) + moon = 546.377297181 MeV - P+ + N^ - 1/3 E ...= 547.499492159 MeV also ---------------------------------------------------------------- h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter - moon) = 545.778013142 MeV - P+ + N^ + 1/2 E ...= 547.476033447 MeV h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter) = 546.077884092 MeV - P+ + N^ + 1/2 E - 1/3 E ...= 547.455578602 MeV h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter + moon) = 546.227647803 MeV - P+ + N^ + 1/2 E - 2/3 E ...= 547.435009292 MeV ==================================================================== This last set, featuring 1/2 units of E, has been tossed in for two reasons; to show that randomness may in fact be a fatal flaw with many of the (wave/orbit) derivations such as this last set, or that more than one route leads to bonanza due to understructures. ------------------------------- ================================================================= - end of MARS PLAYING TUNES WITH THE PROTON - ----------------------------- The JUPITER balloons for IONS ----------------------------- MARS AND JUPITER yields stable ETA 547.45 Mev range ================================================================= - moon - P+ + 10/3 E = 547.480553359 MeV + 2/3 h^/1/2 (Mars + Jupiter) - P+ + 8/3 E = 547.439758265 MeV + 2/3 + moon - P+ + 6/3 E = 547.398505311 MeV ================================================================= NOTE h^/ (inputs) yields recognizable terms in the form of 1/2 the MeV of strings of the h^/ 1/2 (inputs) which means that the ETAS are tightly boxed in by the PROTON's MeV. ================================================================= Also ------------------------- Note These are the only derived sets which show high Electron sums. These sets are included, because of the degree of consistency in high electron units. ================================================================= See under TOOT! TOOT! the ETA is Missing, in PART 11, for similar data details. ================================================================= also ----------------------------------------------------------------- h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter) - moon - P+ + E 1Pi = 547.382757405 MeV h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter) - P+ + E 1Pi - 2/3 E = 547.341778957 MeV h^ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter + moon) - P+ + E 1Pi - 4/3 E = 547.300526003 MeV .470859024 subset - P+ + E 1Pi - E = 547.470859024 MeV also ------------------------------------------------------------------- h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter) - moon - P+ + N^ + 2/3 E = 547.411207185 MeV h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter) - P+ + N^ = 547.370412091 MeV h^ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter + moon) - P+ + N^ - 2/3 E = 547.329159137 MeV subset - P+ + N^ - 1/3 E = 547.499492159 MeV also ------------------------------------------------------------------- h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter) - moon - P+ + 10/3 E = 547.480553359 MeV h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter) - P+ + 8/3 E = 547.439758265 MeV h^ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter + moon) - P+ + 6/3 E = 547.398505311 MeV also ------------------------------------------------------------------- h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter - moon) - P+ + E 1Pi - 1/3 E = 547.362233802 MeV h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter) - P+ + E 1Pi - 2/3 E = 547.341778957 MeV h^ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter) + moon - P+ + E 1Pi - 5/3 E = 547.300526003 MeV ------------------------------------------------------------- h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter - moon) - P+ + N^ + 1/3 E = 547.390866936 MeV h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter) - P+ + N^ = 547.370412091 MeV h^ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter + moon) - P+ + N^ - 1/3 E = 547.349842781 MeV ------------------------------------------------------------- h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter - moon) - P+ + 9/3 E = 547.460213110 MeV h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter) - P+ + 8/3 E = 547.439758265 MeV h^ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter + moon) - P+ + 7/3 E = 547.419188955 MeV all tabled together =================================================== h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter) - moon - P+ + E 1Pi = 547.382574051 MeV - P+ + N^ + 2/3 E = 547.411207185 MeV - P+ + 10/3 E = 547.480553359 MeV h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter - moon) - P+ + E 1Pi - 1/3 E = 547.362233802 MeV - P+ + N^ + 1/3 E = 547.390866936 MeV - P+ + 9/3 E = 547.460131100 MeV h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter) - P+ + E 1Pi - 2/3 E = 547.341778957 MeV - P+ + N^ = 547.370412091 MeV - P+ + 8/3 E = 547.439758265 MeV h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter) + moon - P+ + E 1Pi - 4/3 E = 547.300526003 MeV - P+ + N^ - 2/3 E = 547.329159137 MeV - P+ + 2 E = 547.398505310 MeV h^ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter + moon) - P+ + E 1Pi - E = 547.321219647 MeV - P+ + N^ - 1/3 E = 547.349842781 MeV - P+ + 7/3 E = 547.419188955 MeV ================================================================= subset - P+ + E 1Pi - E = 547.470859024 MeV ------------------------------- ================================================================= - end of The JUPITER balloons for IONS - ========================================== PIONS IN THE SKY AT SATURN ========================================== + moon SATURN - moon | radius + SATURN - radius Sun | *------------------------------------------------* *......................................................* *................................................................* h^/(Saturn) + radius + N^ = PION + - = 139. 569420653 MeV real Pion [139. 56995] MeV FIT h^/(Saturn) + moon + N^ + E = 2 E x FSC = 140. 049025535 MeV = ELECTRON = .510993593 MeV where radius = .ooo6033 x 10 to 13 cm (the moon of earth orbit) where moon = .oo384401 x 10 to 13 cm where PION + - = (139. 56995) MeV FIT where ELECTRON = (.510999065) MeV FIT where FSC = 137.0359895 RATIO and where 140.049025535 MeV x 1/FSC x 1/2 = .510993593 MeV ============ BANG IMAGE 1 ============ charged PION mass | | Electron Amplitude SATURN | | SUN .-------____*____-------.-------------*---*------------ // ----------* + moon moon - radius + - radius The Saturn Bang PION + N^ | |.../.........................|---------------- \\ ----------| + N^ + E 2E x FSC |.........../.............................|------------ \\ ----------| That's it. That's all there is to know. What else is there to show. The charged PION mass and precise power amplified state of the ELECTRON come from the same resonation Cosmically intuned harmonically blinking busily at us up in the sky in the Radius and Colors of SATURN. - end of PIONS IN THE SKY AT SATURN - ===================== JUPITER BANG PATTERNS ===================== Since SATURN seems to punch a solid hole in gravitic space such that its radius translates from metaphysical amplification state to an actual charged PION mass it stands to reason that JUPITER might do something the same its radius contributing to the hyper space description of some fundamental particle. Turns out this assumption is TRUE. The solid mass of JUPITER does articulate the candy stripes of a particular particle. The particle is the 1/2+ SIGMA o state from the SU(3) octuplet group. = 1/2+ SIGMA [1192.55] mEv FIT In fact, there are several interactive fluctuations that contribute, originating from vapor imparting wave stream vibrations of solid JUPITER. ============ BANG IMAGE 2 ============ SUMMER WINTER 1/2 Jupiter Earth | SUN Venus |-----*-----|----------------*----------|----------*-------------* + radius radius - | |.................................................| |...........................................| |.....................................| The Jupiter Bangs | 3/2- |..............| | 3/2+ |........................| 1/2+ |....................| The Earth Moon Metaphor ============= BANG CHARTS 1 ============= LET P+ = 938.27231 mEv LET N^ = 1.293318 mEv LET E^ = .510999065 mEv LET Jupiter RADIUS = .ooo690840 x 10 to 13 cm. LET Jupiter orbit = 7.783285433 x 10 to 13 cm. LET Earth orbit = 1.495979270 x 10 to 13 cm. LET Venus orbit = 1.082089677 x 10 to 13 cm. THEN pattern 1 ======================================================================= EARTH MOON METAPHOR state 1/2+ SIGMA o [1192.55] MeV FIT ======================================================================= h^/ (Venus) - P+ x 2/7 + P+ + N^ = 1192.508 950191 mEv h^/ 1/2 (Earth + Venus) - P+ x 6/4 x 2/7 + 2/3 E = 1192.558 92078 mEv h^/ (Earth) - P+ x 2/3 + P+ + N^ - 5/3 E = 1192.565 344941 mEv ======================================================================= pattern 2 ======================================================================= JUPITER BANG PATTERN state 1/2+ SIGMA o [1192.55] MeV FIT ======================================================================= the bang 253.549187179 h^/ (Jupiter - RADIUS) + P+ + E + 1/3 E minus = 1192.502 82926 mEv 253.526682297 h^/ (Jupiter) + P+ + E + 1/2 E = 1192.565 49089 mEv plus 253.504181409 h^/ (Jupiter + RADIUS) + P+ + N^ - E the bang = 1192.558 81034 mEv ======================================================================= pattern 3 ======================================================================= h^/ (Venus) - P+ x 2/7 + N^ = 1192.508 95019 mEv minus h^/ (Jupiter - RADIUS) + P+ + 4/3 E the = 1192.502 82926 mEv bang ======================================================================= pattern 4 ======================================================================= h^/ (Earth) - P+ x 2/3 + P+ + N^ - 5/3 E = 1192.565 344944 mEv h^/ (Jupiter) + P+ + 3/2 E = 1192.565 49089 mEv ======================================================================= pattern 5 ========================================================================= 255.135474621 h^/ (Earth + Venus) divide by 3 + P+ - 5/3 E = 1192.55 611951 mEv plus 253.504181409 h^/ (Jupiter + RADIUS) + P+ + N^ - E the = 1192.55 874688 mEv bang ========================================================================= pattern 6 ======================================================================= 255.135474620 h^/ (Earth + Venus) divide by 3 + P+ - 5/3 E = 1192.556 11951 mEv 252.943322190 h^/ 1/2 (Earth + Venus) - P+ x 6/4 x 2/7 + 2/3 E = 1192.558 92078 mEv 253.504181409 h^/ (Jupiter + RADIUS) + P+ + N^ - E the = 1192.558 81034 mEv bang 1192.558 81034 accuracy ---------------- 99.99999 07 % 1192.558 92078 ======================================================================= POWERFUL CLUE ------------- In BANG IMAGE 2 a 'winter' position shown on the opposite side of the SUN (an oppositive position with respect to a laboratory reference's point of center on the 'summer' side of the image), directly tangles a 3/1- JP state wavelength. However else this can be interpreted, it is suggested that if machanics DO describe the innerscenes of particles, that the mechanics can be seen in the WAVELENGTHS, and can have mechanical features in SELF EVIDENT DISPLAYS that simply do not appear when particle masses (mass energy equivalents) are the only perspective with each particle's mass distinct and sitting solo, apart from all other particles except via infe r r r r ed decay modes and cascade showers. - end of JUPITER BANG PATTERNS ================================ THE JUPITER orbital HEXAGRAM ========================= JUPITER HYPERWAVE ESTATES ______________________________ full wave esteem ------------------ Hyperwave ESTATES for JUPITER features just the entity portion of Jupiter itself, that part which cycles around the SUN in the Solar system locked into an equalateral triangle diamond constant with the Trojans, the diamond itself being but one part of a giant HEXAGRAM which cyclonnically sweeps around rythmic space, with one point of the HEXAGRAM being the JUPITER Hyperwave ESTATES, the other point the SUN. Energy, and many fundamental vibrations, can be sensed in this array. In quick imges, here is what is going on around the vacinity of JUPITER. ------------------------ ESTATE HYPERWAVE IMAGE 1 ------------------------ |.......The Hyperwave Estate Area......| | | | | | JUPITER | | eccentricty | eccentricty radius + | - radius HEXAGRAM SUN |--------------,----*----,-------------| .............\\..........* A P aphelion perhelion |.............| - radius |..................| no radius |.......................| + radius ------------------ ESTATE SCHEMATIC 1 ------------------ ====================================== - radius h^/ (Jupiter eccentricity) - moon *-*-- = 5296.43753280 | | | *-- diff = (N^ - E) x FSC | | - N^ + 2/3 E | | for N^ = 1.293457898 | | | | | | 1.293318 diff --|-|-- (3/2 E x FSC) + 1/3 E | | into N^ is 1.293672510 | | - radius | | h^/ (Jupiter eccentricity) ....... | *|-- = 5242.34869655 | | | | | *-- diff 52.995260777 | | = 1/2 (3/2 E x FSC) - 2/3 E | | + N^ | | for E = E+^ .510998947 | | - radius | | h^/ (Jupiter eccentricity) + moon *-*-- = 5189.35343577 ====================================== 5278.7 MeV BOTTOM MESON RANGE + radius | h^/ (Jupiter eccentricity) - moon *-*-- = 5276.86797899 | | | *-- diff = (N^ - E) x FSC | | + 1/3 E | | for N^ = 1.293373590 | | | | | | 1.293318 diff --|-|-- (3/2 E x FSC) + N^ + 2/3 E | | into N^ is 1.293675444 | | + radius | | h^/ (Jupiter eccentricity) ....... | *|-- = 5223.17607887 | | | | | *-- diff 52.610280094 | | = 1/2 (3/2 E x FSC) + 1/3 E | | for E = E+^ .5110059065 | | + radius | | h^/ (Jupiter eccentricity) + moon *-*-- = 5170.56579878 On the very first sighting it is plain to see that a plethora of involved mass splits is bracketed in the fences formed in hard copy by the 2 parameters of the JUPITER Hexagram, the two parameters being eccentricity, and radius. There are many more mass splits in this ESTATE area. The mass splits which have the tightest aspects seem to close in upon ratio integer variables of the ELECTRON raised in power amplitude by the Fine Structure Constant. ===================================================== THE JUPITER HIGH RISE HYPERWAVE ESTATES DEVELOPEMENTS ===================================================== A Sherlock Holmes investigator might assume that not just a few nicky dorks should show up in such a foundation arrangement for the estate plateau's for the solid bang impact of the radius of Jupiter, added, and subtracted from eccentricity of Jupiter to yield estate hyperwaves already blueprinted everywhere. What about cross routing through the spreads, Sherlock asks pulling on the dutch pipe with deep intuition coloring the smoke of each draw. Well, that is easy to check, says Watson, puzzled by hearing the famed voice musing aloud, just check them, says Watson, pulling the daily newspaper up under the eyeballs again with a crinkly sounding shuffle and looking to the headlines again announcing Sherlock's discovery of Jupiter Hyperwave Estates. Yes, Yes, exclaims Sherlock bounding upon the instant to the wall and off it and back to the writing desk I shall do that at ONCE! Deep in the dim brain of the pen and paper Sherlock, is an element of urge forcing a kind of yearn in the brain pan of this fictional character, to see where the Ballon Bubbles are. Where is 126 MeV, and the others, the 148 MeV, and 177 MeV? Well, instead of studying the holy smoke coiling from the unlit pipe, Sherlock did some homework, actually tried datas in the machine, which spat out sucrease on the very first equation. In short order, MORE has been deliniated by the great preposterous fraud known by the sleuths as Sherlock Holmes. - radius h^/ (Jupiter eccentricity) - moon *-*-- = 5296.43753280 | | diff 125.871834020 + radius | h^/ (Jupiter eccentricity) + moon *-*-- = 5170.56579878 + radius h^/ (Jupiter eccentricity) - moon *-*-- = 5276.86797899 | | diff 1/2 of 175. 029108260 - radius | h^/ (Jupiter eccentricity) + moon *-*-- = 5189.35343577 5296.43753288 = 125.871834020 a Balloon which touches 5170.56579878 base with a number of = B1 things but does not seem to home in precisesly on anything. However, as a Balloon, there is: B1 x 5/7 + 2E = 177.242425758 = N^ x FSC for 1.29340056 5276.86798891 = 87.514553140 5189.35343577 = 1/2 of 175.029108260 = 5/2 x FSC for .510899680 ========== ELECTRON + radius h^/ (Jupiter eccentricity) - moon *-*-- = 5276.86797899 | | diff 34.519282440 - radius | h^/ (Jupiter eccentricity) ...... *-*-- = 5242.34869655 where diff + E is 1/2 E x FSC for E = .511256665 ELECTRON - radius h^/ (Jupiter eccentricity) - moon *-*-- = 5296.43753280 | | diff 1/2 of 146.522907860 + radius | h^/ (Jupiter eccentricity) ...... *-|-- = 5223.17607887 LET B2 = 146.522907860 Close in value to Venus 146.522907860 Bubble Balloon B2 x 6 + P+ = approximately h^/ (Venus) + moon for moon orbit = .003670166 x 10 to 13cm in reverse engineering h^/ (Venus) + moon - P+ x 1/6 = 146.474417302 ================== HYPERWAVE ESTATES ________________________ 1/2 wave esteem ================== Half waves, moe than doubles the number of hot spots on the ESTATE property, and takes the landscape right into the realm of UPSILON and X mesons. Specifically, just the factors h^/1/2 (Jupiter eccentricity) - moon h^/1/2 (Jupiter eccentricity) h^/1/2 (Jupiter eccentricity) + moon takes the plateau into direct contact with two UPSILON states: h^/1/2 (Jupiter eccentricity) - moon = S 4 UPSILON h^/1/2 (Jupiter eccentricity) h^/1/2 (Jupiter eccentricity) + moon = S 3 UPSILON as already detailed in ITS UP TO THE UPSILON in PART 9. NOTE Dovetailing in the JUPITER HYPERWAVE ESTATES variables with the bangs of + and - JUPITER radius will yield a host of interconnects, most all of them being ratio inter multiples of the ELECTRON, power amplified by the Fine Structure Constant. It seems that the two plateaus, JUPITER HYPERWAVE ESTATES for FULL WAVES and for 1/2 WAVES, are major platforms for higher energy collision resonances. There is so much busy body going on especially in the 1/2 wave areas that no attempt is going to be made to try and sort them out in definative fashion, herein. Let's let the sleuths do it, they being those who know how to properly adjust the many consistent ESTATE variables in to integrated particle properties. ------- SUMMARY ------- There are 3 fundamental groups in the 1/2 waves for the JUPITER HYPERWAVE ESTATES, in the High Rise Developements area which lands amidst UPSILON mesons. ============================================================== 1. 1/2 waves without the BANG of JUPITER's radius ============================================================== h^/1/2 (Jupiter eccentricity) - moon = 10683.2919854 eccentricity - moon) = 10573.2692915 h^/ (Jupiter eccentricity) ..... = 10465.4896516 eccentricity + moon) = 10359.8851633 h^/ 1/2 (Jupiter eccentricity) + moon = 10256.3906378 ============================================================== 2. 1/2 waves with the BANG of JUPITER's radius subtracted ============================================================== - radius h^/1/2 (Jupiter eccentricity) - moon - radius eccentricity - moon) x 2 - radius h^/ (Jupiter eccentricity) .... x 2 - radius eccentricity + moon) x 2 - radius h^/ 1/2 (Jupiter eccentricity) + moon ============================================================== 3. 1/2 waves with the BANG of JUPITER's radius added ============================================================== + radius h^/1/2 (Jupiter eccentricity) - moon + radius eccentricity - moon) x 2 + radius h^/ (Jupiter eccentricity) .... x 2 + radius eccentricity + moon) x 2 + radius h^/ 1/2 (Jupiter eccentricity) + moon ============================================================== In the three groups, the radius of JUPITER has been added and subtracted to the ECCENTRICTY of JUPITER, before any MOON terms are factored into the strings. It is possible that other variables of discrete real kind may also turn up within the ESTATES, by subtracting and adding JUPITER's radius, after the fact of the MOON orbit plus and minus increment; in other words, at the end of each possible string. The main point is that the JUPITER HEXAGRAM in space which houses the JUPITER estates right at one of the end points of the HEXAGRAM is actually a small wavelength (Compton), there in the tiny end point area, resulting in large leaps in energy equivalents when very small increments are made upon any source wave from the HEXAGRAM end point area. The fact that so many direct hits occur in the differences between data points across the total spread is way out of the spectre of co-incidence. Too many solid H I T S ! No, can't be coincidence mutters Watson in silence distracted by the strident piercing voice of Professor Moriarty who has come racing to the home of Holmes in answer to the shouts of acclaim Holmes was already giving himself, once again, as every story reader knows. These large leaps in energy fit fall within the bracketed energy states already identified as first cause principles under the BANG BUBBLES of PART 10-A. It is information which all falls within the range of (E x FSC) = 70.03 MeV and no lower, to 1 and 2 times a set of precise variables ranging up to 177.6 MeV, but no higher. as already identified in first cause principles under BANG BUBBLES of PART 10-A. Professor Moriarty departs the scene, foiled once again. ============================================================== ESTATES SUMMARY There are in toto, 21 mechanical sub units many of which are direct HITS as particle resonances as both physical particles per se, and as units of DIFFerence between arms in the spread, which are 7 main nodes in the form of a master line and six child groups, whose codes are: ---------- FULL PICTURE Highrise Developements Area ---------- 10723.3997483 - radius ....... most MeV 1/2 (JUPITER eccentricity) - MOON ...... + radius ..... - radius) ........ 1/2 (JUPITER eccentricity (- MOON ....... + radius) ...... - radius ......... child 1/2 (JUPITER eccentricity - moon) ........ 10573.2692915 + radius ....... S 4 UPSILON - radius ........... h^/ 1/2 (JUPITER ECCENTRICITY) ........... master 10465.4896516 + radius .......... - radius ......... S 2 UPSILON 1/2 (JUPITER eccentricity + moon) ........ 10359.8851633 + radius ....... child - radius) ......... 1/2 (JUPITER eccentricity (+ MOON ........ X MESON + radius) ....... (10231) - radius ........ 1/2 (JUPITER eccentricity) - MOON ....... + radius ...... least MeV 10219.6942513 ============================================================ TAKE NOTE OF THIS HYPERWAVE TUNING FORK, JUST AS AN EXAMPLE ============================================================ - radius ....... most 1/2 (JUPITER eccentricity) - MOON ...... + radius ..... |- 10643.4831274 | | h^/ 1/2 (JUPITER ECCENTRICITY) ... 10465.4896516 DIFF | 350.131618090 | | - radius ....... |- 10293.3515093 1/2 (JUPITER eccentricity) + MOON ...... + radius ...... least DIFF is two units of (5/2 E x FSC) = 350.126312529 SO THAT DIFF 1/2 (350.131618090) x 2/5 x 1/FSC = .511006808 MeV WHERE 2 (5/2 E x FSC) = 350.126312529 THEN (350.131618090) - (350.126312529) = .oo5305560 x FSC which may be fluff .... = 3/2 E = .484701849 MeV but, still, it comes from a tightly compiled infrastructure with very large fluctuations, between single parts comprising 7 group sets of 21 (wave/orbit/radius/mass) mechanically distinct parts. ESTATES observed and included at the very last minute January 20, 1995. - end JUPITER HYPERWAVE ESTATES - =============================================== The MUON and NEUTRON sing the same song =============================================== The LAMBDA mass increment for the PROTON and the MUON do not seem to be singing from the same sheet of music. The NEUTRON seems to be the true RESONANCE factor attached to the MUON. One can deduce the other to 8 significant digits of accuracy. Concider the following intones: It involves the MUON and LAMBDA, with the NEUTRON conducting. Since only three fundamental particle masses are know with constant accuracy only these three are used to conduct the data. The three are PROTON = 938.27231 MeV MUON = 105.658389 MeV ELECTRON = .510999065 MeV N^ value used below = 1.2933 27903 MeV was turned up in sources somewhere in the wilds, now forgotten. Why not use it to start anyway in the following. A simple flow chart will explain what can be played in this melody, at least, enough for a first page, before the symphany orchestra gets tuned up, before the house lights change intensity. Since the mass of the MUON is one of the best know fundamental particle masses it stands as a good place to start the chart. Here is the chart. MUON CHART Its as simple as A B C ---------- A *--- LAMBDA [1115.67 8] MeV EXPRMT | ---------------- 1/99.999 7411 % -*- + P+ + 1/3 E = 1115.67 511205 MeV | | *-*- N^ x FSC = 177.232469038 MeV | | | | B * |--- NEUTRON = [939.5656 3] MeV FIT | | --------------- - 99.999999 1 % | | + P+ = 939.5656 37903 MeV | | | | C *-*--- + E = N^ = 1.2933 27903 MeV | ------------- - 99.999 2343 % | [1.2933 18] MeV FIT | | *-*--- divide by FSC = .782328838 MeV | | MUON + N^ + 1/2 E = 107.207206532 MeV --------------------------- when MUON = [105.658389] MeV FIT and P+ = PROTON = [938.27231] MeV FIT MUON CHART 1 ------------ POWER CASCADE Classical Electron Radius ------------- There is another way of percieving the MUON CHART at a single glance. This time a hidden feature is exposed in the open. The hidden feature points to the Classical Electron Radius, as follows: MUON CHART 2 ------------ energy equivalents LAMBDA MUON .........../ / + 1/3 E / \\\\\\ / .........../ \\\\\ / / \\\\ Classical Electron Radius / N^ x FSC / ................ \\\ ......................... / ............. 107.207206532 \\ 70.025262505 / 177.232469038 \ / / \ / / .............. \ / / 105.913888532 \ \ / / \ \ / / - 1/2 E ..........\ \ / / = 105.658389 mEv \ \ / / \ \ / / \ x / NEUTRON .............. PROTON 1.293327903 NEUTRON --------- ............... ---------- PROTON N^ MUON CHART 3 ------------ LAMBDA ARM MUON ARM / / \ / \ / + 1/3 E \ / ........ \ / (N^ - E) x FSC \ E x FSC / N^ x FSC <.............. \ <..................... .... / <............. 107.207206532 \ 70.025262505 / 177.232469038 diff = N^ \ / ..........................\ / 105.912888532 \ / diff = 1/2 E \ / ............. \ / 105.658389 MUON NEUTRON PROTON ............. in which N^ is hidden 1.293327903 and the NEUTRON is exposed as well as the MUON. DRIFT AND FLUTTER Digital disharmony ----------------- In MUON CHART 3, the MUON is calculated from FSC (Fine Structure Constant) factors, starting with N^. Yet the strings can also be run in any of several directions, including starting with the NEUTRON mass, or LAMBDA mass, or MUON mass. The calculation of the masses of other fundamental particles, with just masses of ELECTRON, PROTON, NEUTRON known, is to near precision but not quite. Depending on which direction a string is run to calculate, the resulting mass varies at the N^ digits, due to trunkation arrising from limitations of input term's accuracies. Or so it seems. For instance, note the way the calculated N^ masses turn a bit, when the following calculation method is used: MUON CHART 4 ------------ MUON N^ 1/2 E E x FSC 105.658389 + 1.293327903 + .255499532 + 70.025262505 + 1/3 E = 177.402811962 + P+ = 1115.67512196 MeV ------------- LAMBDA ------- WHEREAS The French Horn version ------- MUON N^ 1/2 E N^ - E x FSC ........... 105.658389 + 1.293327903 + .255499532 = 107.207216435 was hidden ........... divide by FSC = .782328911 now revealed + E = 1.293327976 = N^ ............ x FSC + 1/3 E + P+ = 1115.67512196 MeV ------------- LAMBDA where the two shown N^ are discretely different. .......... This sounds like a job for RENORMAL PERSON to stand on stage and conduct orchestra tuneup, until ........ N^ is stablized and becomes constant, with a value of ........ The two french horn tones N^ are added together and divided by two. The DRIFT and FLUTTER of MUON CHART 4 are played again and a new N^ is added to N^ and again divided by two. The results are blended with the violas and flute with kettle drums holding the bottom line. The same is repeated several times as RENORMAL PERSON watches the score and studies the musicians with a raised left, then right, eye. Well what do you know. RENORMAL PERSON taps the podium and gets the 1st french horn player to wipe some valve on rough lips to soften the FLUTTER pursed against the blowhole, so that now the less rubbery lips play exactly the same sound as french horn number 2, who is instructed not to puff so hard on the initial attack of sound and so eliminate DRIFT, so now when performed by the two french horn players in total synch, the two sounds reverberate as one pure vibration heard in the music. RENORMAL PERSON, capably adapting the score to eliminate sour notes, does the job with only a few turns through the passages. That results in perfect tones sounding through the philharmonic. The perfect pitch has been found. With profession skill, RENORMAL PERSON leans over the podium and writes in the annotation. The score has been changed. The new N^ is ............... 1.2933279761 ............... When substituted in the scales of MUON CHART 4 all parts of the score become constant. Nothing like a miracle. Just another everyday occurrence in getting a Cosmic concert ready. Why the orchestra metaphor ? Havin' fun. Just havin' fun. - Finished - - end of MUONS AND NEUTRON - end of PART 11 PART 12 ------------------------------------------------------ FACTORS OF THE ELECTRON ------------------------------------------------------------ Featuring: Amplitudes with the Fine Structure Constant ================================================== ELECTRON ratios ================================================== There is an intriguing set of ELECTRON related figures which keep turning up on their own throughout this disclosure. These figures are not randomly sourced but are heart and parcel of fundamental structures. 1/2 E Electron mass units -------------------------- Specifically, a 1/2 ELECTRON mass equivalent term is common as are 3/2 and 5/2 ELECTRON mass equivalents times the Fine Structure Constant. 2 ELECTRON masses times the FSC is also common. There are pictures inherent in this. Since the ELECTRON's atomic binding energy, the Rydber Energy Constant, is a fundamental ratio to the ELECTRON mass, it provides a picture for perceiving ELECTRON mass ratios. A second picture can be provided by the so-called Classical Electron Radius. And a third picture can be provided by the Bohr diameter of an atom. ELECTRON SCALE 1 ---------------- FSC ---* = 9595.98113748 MeV | | UPSILON range | | | | + 1/2 E x FSC | | = 175.063156264 MeV 5/2 E | | N^ x FSC range | | | | x 2 | = 140.05052501 MeV 2 E | | charged PION range | | | | - 1/2 E x FSC | | = 105.037893758 MeV 3/2 E | | MUON range | | | | Classical Electron Radius FSC | = 70.025262505 MeV 1 E | | | | FSC | | = 35.012631252 MeV 1/2 E | | | | | | | | | wave ................| ELECTRON |........... mass equivalent | | | | | | 2 x Electron Compton --* FSC | = .255499532 MeV wavlength | | | Bohr orbit (radius) |-* x 2 | = .oo3728940 MeV | | | Bohr diameter --* FSC | = .001864470 | | | | x 2 *-- = .oooo27211396 MeV | | --* | = .oooo13605698 MeV | electron Rydberg constant binding energy .oooo13605698 MeV It is felt that the 1/2 units of E mass represent momentum, or gamma photon quantities, rather than fractal units of an electron per se, since .511 MeV is commonly associated as the momentum of an ejected decay particle from atoms. In ELECTRON SCALE 1 shown above the 1/2 units of E are all power amplified by the FSC. Each FSC amplitude is met with a physical entity. And thus factors of FSC squared are not of themselves the whole story. The one entity not entirely self evident in terms of a physical picture is the Classical Electron Radius, by itself. It is not seen in an instant just what it is being crafted by the measure in that it is not a diameter or orbit, and not a Compton wave length in association with a physical particle. What is the Classical Electron Radius ? No answer comes from these tips except it is the Bohr orbit divided by the FSC squared. The use of the 'Classical Electron Radius' does find some physically sensed meaning within structures called 'Circle Geometry' in association with the KAON CIRCLE MULTIPLEX of PART 10; a fundamental structuring scheme which expands to include a finite set of mass integer units summarized under BANG BUBBLES of PART 10-A. ================================================== ELECTRON fractions ================================================== 1/3 E Electron mass units -------------------------- Units of 1/3 and 2/3 the mass of the ELECTRON are a main feature throughout this disclosure. Many times ELECTRON mass units comparable to ratio integer sum units which define a QUARK, have been proposed as also definitional for ELECTRONS. However such theoretical proposals have never had sufficient favor to be worked into the basics of CHROMODYNAMIC theories. Here in this disclosure, most all of the images and pictures would simply vanish from view if ratio integer ELECTRON mass 1/3 units were not allowed, and not taken for granted. These 1/3 and 2/3 ELECTRON mass units turn up everywhere in galore. There are places where adding and subtracting multiples of 1/3 units of the Electron seems to be just play acting, just jerry rigging, to make things happen, and this is probably true. There are other places, however, where adding and subtracting multiples of 1/3 units of the Electron operate in such tight constraints, that it is not possible to dismiss the activity as just, merely, coincidence in particular where decay modes are correct, and where, when the pencil is sharpened, and careful note is taken as to how charges add up, and flip around, switching back and forth, to come out on the main cross country highway still in the correct lanes, then the concept of crash fades in the face by gigantic flashing green lights on the freeway. Number 1 below: Amplitude resonances, works well to approximate particle mass states, and ELECTRON amplitude resonances, based on whole ratio multiples of E x FSC. ----------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ELECTRON AMPLITUDE RESONANCES ball park figures ----------------------------------------------------------------- When FSC is the Fine Structure Constant = 137.0359895 ratio E x FSC squared = Upsilon electron amplitude 9595.6 MeV 5/2 E x FSC + N^ + 2 E = (Lambda - Proton) mass difference 177.3 MeV NOTE (5/2 E x FSC) is an approximation of the (Neutron - Proton) mass difference which is more accurately gained when the MUON mass is the starter MeV rather than 5/2 E x FSC. Here are basic ELECTRON 'power amplitude' correspondences -------------- -------------------------------- 2 E x FSC - 1 E = Pion (charged) electron amplitude 139.5 MeV 3/2 E x FSC + 1 E = Muon electron amplitude 105.5 MeV 1 E x FSC = mess energy, er, mass energy 70.02 MeV of classical electron radius 1/2 E x FSC = mass energy of a 'classical electron diameter' = 35.01 MeV = (rather than the 'Classical Electron Radius'). ----------------------------------------------------------------- 2. ELECTRON AMPLITUDE RESONANCES for adjusted electron mass using (Neutron-Proton) mass difference FIT for control. ----------------------------------------------------------------- when Neutron-Proton mass difference = N^ = [1.293318] MeV FIT N^ x FSC = L^ = 177.231111868 MeV + Proton = 1115.50342186 MeV Lambda mass = [1115.684] MeV FIT LAMBDA mass [1115.684] MeV FIT - P+ = 177.411689947 MeV divide by FSC = N^ = 1.294635742 MeV Another LAMBDA mass is listed in the Review of Particle Properties of /95. It is a main experiment value of (1115.678) MeV EXPRMT LET LAMBDA mass = (1115.678) MeV - P+ = L^ L^ - N^ - 2 E divide by 5/2 = Ex = .175.090373869 MeV divide by FSC reduces to Ey = .5110785111 MeV Let the imagination take hold, to find that Ey - E = .oooo79446 MeV times FSC squared = 1.49196538 MeV which approximates N^ + 1/2 E x 1/FSC squared which in reverse enginering yeilds = 175.091411935 MeV + N^ + 2 E + P+ = 1115.679 03806 MeV * --------------- 1115.678 Lambda Exp * This demonstration is shown as an example of how a particle mass such as the LAMBDA can be approximated to near exactitude by integer unit mass-constant factoring. The actual LAMBDA FIT mass [1115.684] MeV is not seen by any such factoring whereas the EXPERIMENTAL value (1115.678) MeV or close variations, turns up easily. ----------------------------------------------------------------- 3. ELECTRON AMPLITUDE RESONANCES try adjusted electron mass ----------------------------------------------------------------- using (Lambda-Proton) mass difference FIT for control. when Lambda mass = (1115.684) MeV FIT then Lambda-Proton mass difference = L^ = 177.411690 MeV FIT L^ divide by FSC = N^+ = 1.294635742 MeV mass factor L^ - N^ - 2 E divide by FSC divide by 5/2 = Ex = .511096025 L^ - N^ - 2 Ex divide by FSC divide by 5/2 = Ex = .511095459 * * N^ x FSC = L^ = 177.23028965 MeV + Proton = 1115.50259965 MeV Lambda mass = (1115.684) MeV FIT Drift and Flutter are noticed, depending on which factors are deemed as inputs, it is not readily seen which inputs are valid. * * See below. --------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. ELECTRON AMPLITUDE RESONANCES Particles and amplitudes fall into place? --------------------------------------------------------------------- An intuitive assumption is that all datas cannot be resolved into one single set of pure form constants due to the existence of charge/mass and magnetic influences on actual particle masses which discretely effect experimental determinations out of focus from pure form. The spectum of light in atomic shells is influenced out of beat to the pure form of Rydberg values by, for instance in the case of the simple hydrogen atom, by the mass to charge interference ratio between the Electron and Proton, the Electron having only 1/1836.1527 the mass of the Proton and yet the power of 1 full charge unit to effect the central Proton's position offcentered by minute amounts, which effects the result spectrum of photons. But the measured spectrum, compared to pure form spectra can be adjusted (and routinely is in physics), by a single small ratio. It is possible that elementary particle masses also have a pure form, and that the pure form arises from ratio inter multiples of the Electron in amplitudes of the Fine Structure Constant. However the pure is modified by mechnical interferences that hide the pure form from full view. At least, this is an idea which has the words 'speculation ... perhaps' attached. --------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- 5. ELECTRON AMPLITUDE RESONANCES try adjusted electron mass using MUON FIT for controls, not so good. Demonstration of frustration. ----------------------------------------------------------------- when MUON mass = [105.658389] MeV FIT - 1 E divide by 3/2 divide by FSC = .511531753 MeV = Ex substitute for - 1 Ex then ELECTRON becomes = .511529161 MeV = Ey substitute for - 1 Ey renormalize again then ELECTRON becomes = .511529174 MeV = Ez And so, using Ez as Electron mass substitute, the following Electron mass amplitudes occur. 5/2 E x FSC + N^ = 1.293312 MeV + 2 E = (Lambda - Proton) mass difference 177.043 MeV **** blahh NOTE (5/2 E x FSC) itself + N^ + 2 Ez - 1/3 Ez divided by FSC still merely approximates the (Neutron - Proton) mass difference 1.293237780 [1.293312] MeV FIT and such renderings lead nowhwere. For instance, when ELECTRON = .511529174 MeV = Ez 2 Ez x FSC - 1 E = PION (charged) electron amplitude 139.6842703 MeV [139.56995] MeV FIT blahh **** 3/2 Ez x FSC + 1 Ez = MUON electron amplitude 105.6583896408 MeV [105.658389] MeV FIT A perfect fit, which since Ez was gained from the MUON, is a perfect co-incidence. Nothing else. The Ez does not link to any other fact. It is a false positive. ------------------------ - end of FACTORS OF THE ELECTRON - PART 13 -------------------------------- CRITICAL ACCURACY -------------------------------------- Equations that are perfect and symmetrical should yield identical results when run forward, and backwards. In most cases within the limits and disclosure in particular where solar wave (orbits) are included, a forward result to give the starting term for reverse derivation, yields a slight departure from the starting data when variable input taken from solar orbit tables or from the Particle data tables is substituted for the end term to become the starter in running an equation backwards. Fortunately these discrepencies (departures) are very slight, suggesting that MeV and/or Solar orbit datas as published in data tables are off the real mark in small, not major, ways. Attempts have been made to derive 'perfect' constant result when running equations both forward and backwards. It seems possible that perfect results might be achieved by re-guritating; running the equations over and over again to home in on 'constants' from both directions. Re-normalizing attempts were not norm for the currently disclosed datas. The results of running the equations both forward and backwards were close enough that re-normalizing was concidered not crucial, for the present time. Also, some MeV particle masses achieve a subtle revision when an experiment has new accuracy, and extremely discrete revisions to values of the Physical Constants continue to occur as physics experiments show new accuracies in the lab. Particle physics MeV datas that are used in this disclosure came from 1994 (August). The last prior attempt on this project was put on the back shelf in February of 1986, using Particle physics MeV datas published in April, 1984. The projected was originated in the summer of 1967. Significantly, all parts in the big picture under concideration as derivable Mass calculations, improved discretely rather than diminishing in accuracy, when inputting 1994 datas for physical constants, when comparing derivation results to those that were last looked at in 1986 using the April 1984 data tables for the Physical Constants and Particle masses. The solar datas came from tables published in 1981 from datas supplied at the time by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, having Planetary Constant changes from previous long standing datas due to new measures coming in from the satellites to Mars and cruising past Jupiter and Saturn. More recent Physical Constant datas for the Solar System are slightly out of whack compared to the 1981 stuff, so the '81 Solar datas have been used since the '81 values seem more to the point of accuracy in demonstrating (wave/orbit) energy harmonics models among the fundamental particles. - end of CRITICAL ACCURACY - PART 14 ------------------------------------------------------ SYMMETRY RATIO GROUPS ------------------------------------------------------------ INTEGER RATIOS There is a 'Law and Order' to the integer ratios which govern the construct states of the XION particles deemed defined by the 'Earth Moon Metaphor', the integers being: XION - P+ = V? = a BALLOON state AND V? / 7 x X? = P+ = another particle V? / 6 x X? = P+ = another particle V? / 5 x X? = P+ = another particle WHERE X? is another whole integer ratio AND P+ - V?/X? x X? = another particle WHERE X? can be any integer, typically 1 2 3 4 5. WHEN for example V? = 3/2- XION isospin. And so, for instance, ball park associations with the OCTUPLET SU(3) group of particles is had by the whole integer ratios, taken for example, from the 3/2- XION group: - moon WHERE isospin state = h^/ (VENUS) + moon AND V? = 3/2- XION isospin state - P+ THEN OCTUPLETS 3/7 + P+ = 1/2+ XION 2/7 + P+ = 1/2+ SIGMA 1/7 + p+ = unknown DECUPLETS 5/6 + P+ = 3/2+ OMEGA 4/6 + P+ = 3/2+ XION 3/6 + P+ = 3/2+ SIGMA 2/6 + P+ = 3/2+ DELTA V? x 1/? + P+ = unknown LAMBDA V? x 1/5 + P+ = 1/2+ LAMBDA But also, other XION families also enjoy the same fundamental whole integer ratio numbering system, for example the 3/2+ XION group will generate SU(3) sets as follows: - moon WHERE isospin state = h^/ 1/2(VENUS + EARTH) + moon AND V? = 3/2+ XION isospin state - P+ THEN OCTUPLETS 6/4 x 3/7 P+ = 1/2+ XION 6/4 x 2/7 P+ = 1/2+ SIGMA 6/4 x 1/7 P+ = unknown DECUPLETS 5/4 + P+ = 3/2+ OMEGA 4/4 + P+ = 3/2+ XION 3/4 + P+ = 3/2+ SIGMA 2/4 + P+ = 3/2+ DELTA V? x 1/? + P+ = unknown LAMBDA V? x 6/4 x 1/5 P+ = 1/2+ LAMBDA The fundamental stable 1/2+ XION particle has shown up in the other two groups of whole ratio numbering system, and it too has its own space generating SU(3) sets as follows: - moon WHERE isospin state = h^/ (EARTH) + moon AND V? = 1/2+ XION isospin state - P+ THEN OCTUPLETS 3/3 P+ = 1/2+ XION 2/3 P+ = 1/2+ SIGMA 1/3 P+ = unknown DECUPLETS 7/3 5/6 + P+ = 3/2+ OMEGA 7/3 4/6 + P+ = 3/2+ XION 7/3 3/6 + P+ = 3/2+ SIGMA 7/3 2/6 + P+ = 3/2+ DELTA V? x 7/3 x 1/6 + P+ = unknown LAMBDA V? x 1/3 x 7/5 + P+ = 1/2+ LAMBDA ========================================= BALLOON MASS STATES ========================================= A new term is being introduced. ! BALLOON ! Certain masses are going to be called 'BALLOON' mass states, and refers to special variable units of mass which come directly from WAVELENGTH factoring. For example, the equivalent mass energy for Venus orbit in a solar (wave/orbit) model, is 1823.57393767 MeV and comes from h^/ (Venus) = 1823.57393767 MeV = 3/2- XION - P+ = 885.301594354 Mev = V0 = the BALLOON mass state for 3/2- XION Generically, any V? is a BALLOON mass state. ----------------------------------------- HERE COMES THE MUON ----------------------------------------- The OCTUPLET and DECUPLET groups each have a unit mass associated. The unit masses are: LAMBDA = 177 MeV DECUPLET = 147 MeV OCTUPLET = 126 MeV In general, there is a common interval of mass between an OCTUPLET unit (126 MeV) and DECUPLET unit (147 MeV). The interval is in the range of 21.1 MeV = i? which has whole integer correspondences to the OCTUPLET and DECUPLET unit masses, as follows: i? x 8 = LAMBDA mass range not included i? x 7 = DECUPLET mass range 147 MeV i? x 6 = OCTUPLET mass range 126 MeV i? x 5 = MUON mass range [105.658389] MeV FIT For instance, for any DECUPLET mass subtracted from any OCTUPLET mass, there will be a common mass interval in ratio integer multiples of 2 units of i? that is, of 42.2 MeV = 2 x i? SO THAT 42.2 MeV x 5/2 = the MUON range 105.6 MeV. But another way of seeing this is for instance in the V? isospin state of 3/2- XION, where (Vo x 11/42) - (Vo x 1/7) = 105.3 MeV range. WHERE Vo x 1/42 = 21.1 x 11 = 232 - Vo x 1/7 = 105.3 but this is pushing hard on the limits of credibility, the point being that terms 42.2 and 21.1 are many gap fillers in a lineal sum fashion, if just the sums are explored. ----------------------------------------- EXAMPLE 3/2- XION ----------------------------------------- In actual digits, the BALLOON mass state for h^/(Venus) - P+ = Vo is 885.301594354 MeV Vo x 2/7 = 252.943312672 MeV diff = 105.393046946 MeV -* in MUON range. Vo x 1/6 = 147.550265725 MeV | | where Vo x 11/42 - (Vo x 1/7) | | = 105.393046946 MeV ---* so that higher digit BALLOON ratios do accue within the mist of much lower ratio integers. COMMENT In fact, unless hallucinations are occuring in widths staring at the calculator, just about any width mass difference for particles can be conconted in accord agreement by using the higher integer BALLOON ratios based on multiples of mass units 21 Mev and 42 MeV to knit together the width amounts. This is in particular reference to the widths listed in abundance in 1984 data table Particle Reviews, now only in brief in the '94 tables. ----------------------------------------- EXAMPLE 3/2+ XION ----------------------------------------- In actual digits, two BALLOON mass states for h^/ 1/2 (Earth + Venus) - P+ = Vev0 is 592.540537729 MeV Vev0 x 6/4 x 2/7 = 253.945944741 MeV diff = 105.810810308 MeV in MUON range. Vev0 x 1/4 = 148.135134432 MeV ----------------------------------------- EXAMPLE 1/2- XION ----------------------------------------- In actual digits, the BALLOON mass state for h^/ (Earth) - P+ = Ve0 is 380.776283084 MeV Ve0 x 2/7 = 253.850855389 MeV diff = 105.771189745 MeV in MUON range. Ve0 x 1/6 = 148.079665643 MeV ----------------------------------------- EXAMPLE generic ----------------------------------------- In the whole scope of the viewscene, there are BALLOONS for every one of the states specified by the parameters of THE EARTH MOON METAPHOR FOR SUBATOMIC PHENOMENA. This in total comprises 9 different collections of BALLOONS, 12 BALLOONS if the ?/? (2250) XION state is also concidered as being legitimate. ?/? (2250) XION is pointed out as holding a possible predicted mass resonance, under PARTICLE PREDICTION at the end of PART 3. PROVISO ----------- All of these BALLOON states will have corresponding MUON range entities, B U T there is no guarantee, no unmistakable sign that these entities are indeed MUON occurrences. For a fact of interest, a BALLOON's 3/2+ XION (decuplet) state mass, minus the mass of the BALLOON's 1/2+ XION (octuplet) state is twice the MUON mass range interval. For example, for: h^/Venus - P+ = BALLOON Vv0 AS BALLOON RATIOS BALLOON Vv0 x 4/6 = 590.201085114 MeV - BALLOON Vv0 x 3/7 = 379.414983287 MeV diff = 210.786101826 MeV x 1/2 = 105.393050913 MeV AS XION PARTICLE STATES BALLOON Vv0 + P+ = 1823.57393767 MeV 3/2- XION BALLOON Vv0 x 4/6 + P+ = 1528.47339511 MeV 3/2+ XION - BALLOON Vv0 x 3/7 + P+ = 1317.68729328 MeV 1/2+ XION diff = 210.786101827 MeV x 1/2 = 105.393050913 MeV ------------------------------------------------ BALLOON vocabulary ------------------------------------------------ Buzz words in on-the-spot dialogue can include BALLOON harmonics BALLOON resonances BALLOON oscillations BALLOON numbers BALLOON states BALLOON ratios BALLOON powers Wishful thinking ------------------------------------------------ BALLOONS ratios, vrs the RYDBERG ratios ------------------------------------------------ The whole hiarchy of BALLOON whole inter units of mass are a system that is converse to the RYDBERG system of whole integer ratios which comprise spectrum lines and energy equivalents in atoms, for instance Hydrogen. In the RYDBERG system, the SQUARES of whole integers combine in ratios to yield spectrum quantities. There are two distinct differences between this, the ATOMIC regime, and the BALLOONS, the partical (wave/orbit) regime: 1. Only whole integers, not square powers, appear in the BALLOON regime. 2. In the BALLOON regime, a smaller integer is over a larger integer to produce a ratio, whereas in the RYDBERG regime, the square of a higher integer is over the square of a lower integer. FOR INSTANCE RYDBERG ratios include, for example 25/16 25/9 25/4 which are 5 squared, 4 squared, 3 squared etc. BALLOON ratios include, for example 5/6 4/6 3/6 2/6 1/6 and 3/7 2/7 1/5 etc. --------------- COMMENT --------------- From somewhere in the inner consciousness comes the term MAGNETIC STRAND and with it an association to BALLOON mass ratios. What this could possibly mean is not even questionable from the point of view of nothing else associated with those words from the inner consciousness, except for a line of poetry: 7 rings around the magnetic strand . The allusion is to magnetic strands being involved in the interknitting wavelength/mass harmonic resonance areas. Is this possible ? ---------------- - end of BALLOON mass states (and ratios) discussions - PART 15 ------------------------------------------------------ KEYBOARD Read If Interested ------------------------------------------------------------ Since use of a simple multi register Calculator device is cited throughout this disclosure; in fact is used as the basis of formulating a new approach in addressing a 'Philosophy of Science' as an alternative mathematical means of factoring and organizing myriad data variables in systematic ways, using an invented 'Symbollic Logic' as a means of depicting operations of the Philosphy; an example of the 'derivation' of several key fundamental particle masses, plus exact particle mass differences, is shown, achieved by the Philosophy means in using the actual Calculator device's capacity to allow 'INTRINSIC CALCULATOR LOGIC' as a criteria for handling the math. Discerning the symmetries yielding the particle masses is as much a success of the 'Calculator Logic' as it is a matter of creative intelligence, in that thousands of calculations could be handled during given work sessions in which changing of direction in mid stride was normal, as the large picture gradually unfolded piece by piece. If you think the discerning of useful patterns out of the myria of possibilities was a 'piece of cake', think again. Even proof reading the draft copy of this disclosure was a slow motion process to ensure that the + and - signs were correct, not to mention errors in data inputs and so on one digit at a time ad infinitum. Only the acceptance of the tedium of writing and retyping data entries was in demand. Computer programming was not in any way there to interfere with the clear mind. This extra splice of disclosure is included here, because it is very revealing as to how all of the factors of this disclosure were intuited, tested, and resolved using just fundamental operators in basic mathematics, skipping past any of the formal mathematics usually associated with the physics of fundamental particles. Here is a schematic of the calculator's keyboard registers, which are also its digit keys. The calculator is Monroe 326 scientist, circ 1971, originally marketed under the name of Compucorp. It has 12 STORE and RECALL memory registers. --------- ----- ----- ----- | STORE | | 7 | | 8 | | 9 | --------- ----- ----- ----- ---------- ----- ----- ----- | RECALL | | 4 | | 5 | | 6 | ---------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- | 1 | | 2 | | 3 | ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- | 0 | | . | | * | <--- change sign key ----- ----- ----- EXAMPLE - STORE registers used for CONSTANT datas Store 9 Proton mass Store 7 h^ digital value of Plank's converter constant Store 6 Moon mean of orbit Store 5 Fine Structure Constant Store 2 Electron mass Store * N^ (Neutron - Proton) mass difference. EXAMPLE - STORE registers used for VARIABLE datas Store 8 Usually a solar orbit MeV in temp concideration Store 4 A solar orbit, usually the Earth mean of orbit Store 3 Temp data, typically 1/3 the electron mass Store 1 A second solar orbit, for example Venus mean of orbit Store 0 Typically the result of Store 7 divided by Store 1 or Store 2, or their sum Store 8 The final results Store . A another final result, for comparison or temp use. EXAMPLE - How STORE and RECALL registers can aid in the quick computation of a particle mass, or solar wave (orbit) equivalent. This illustrates the fundamental simplicity of 'INTRINSIC CALCULATOR LOGIC' as a functionally useful mathematics philosophy. SIMPLE - Deriving the 1/2+ XION (1321.87) status **** neg state Let STORE 4 contain the digits for VENUS mean of orbit Let STORE 6 contain the digits for MOON mean of orbit (RECALL 4 - RECALL 6) and STORE in 0 (RECALL 7 divide RECALL 0) = 1830.07505377 = [1830] EXPMT 3/2- XION Store in 8 when STORE 7 contains h^ when h^ = 1973.2705332 when Venus mean of orbit = 1.082089677 when Moon mean of orbit = .00384401 when Electron mass = .510999060 EXPMT means a resonance state from an individual experiment. COMPLEX - Deriving the 1/2+ LAMBDA (1115.684) neutral, stable RECALL 8 - RECALL 9 = 891.802743777 DIVIDE BY 5 - N^ + 2/3 E = L^ STORE . DIVIDE L^ BY RECALL 5 = N^ STORE 3 ALSO RECALL . + RECALL 9 = (1115.68 026976) MeV LAMBDA [1115.684] MeV FIT when STORE 9 contains Proton mass = 938.27231 when STORE 5 contains Fine Structure Contant = 137.0359850 where N^ means mass difference between Neutron and Proton. where L^ means mass difference between Lambda and Proton. DERIVE - Deriving the stable charged PION using N^ in STORE 3 Recall 3 - 1/3 E divide by Recall 5 Store 3 = N^ RECALL 7 / enter Saturn mean of orbit + Saturn radius = 14.27051099 when Saturn orbit = 14.269906899 when Saturn radius = .ooo60330 plus RECALL 3 = 139.569 467735 where PION mass = [139.569 95) MeV when STORE 3 contains N^ as derived above OTHER DERIVATIONS - Using the 'Calculator Logic' setup now in place as a DEMO. Speculation. Obviously, if more STORE and RECALL registers are available in a Calculating device, all of the above demonstrated derivations can be achieved without having to write down any derived datas, then doing a typed entery (retyping) the data for use in another step. A key named SET would allow multiple digit entry for STORE and RECALL registers. For example STORE then two or three digits tappeed, then SET is the register number which has the data. The advantage is that LEARN and PLAY routines can be STORED intact in memory registers directed through the STORE SET, and RECALL SET combination. The SET key is almost like a 2nd FUNCTION, except it opens up the use of any number of memory registers. In fact, if the Calculator device also had LEARN and PLAY functions, (coupled to registers just as are STORE and RECALL) so that every key pressed, and all datas entered, are stored in sequence in a register, exactly as entered, then PLAY would automatically redo all of the steps one after the other to arrive at the same result, each time that same PLAY register was evoked by a keypress. To make the fantasy complete, the Calculator device also has to have a WALK key, which when pressed prior to a PLAY register, causes the LEARNED steps to proceed step by step with a pause after each step, so that variable datas can be introduced in the middle of a sequence whenever wanted, and resuming to the next step is by pressing PLAY again. The fantasy ends with a laugh. No such Calculator device with such simple and rote keystroke functions, exists. The fantasy concludes by wiping away the existence of programmable logic currently in use in solid state calculators, with one quick but mighty sweep of a hand, with God attached to the elbow. In its place, grinning entities arrive with arms loaded with programmable calculators and computers with mighty complex algebra algorythm softwares, a couple of hours spent to enter one step, with 34 more steps to go, to do one factor done in 30 seconds flat by the 'Simple Calculator Logic' as in the above DEMO. The grinning entities take over. That is what you've got to work with. I stayed with the Monroe 326. - end of KEYBOARD - PART 16 ------------------------------------------------- CANDIDATE FOR THE ILLUSIVE 'HIGGS' BOSON ------------------------------------------------------- In the images, a + and - factor alluding to the mean orbit of the Earth's MOON has been used throughout, in producing exact states of Charge, and whole integer 1/3, 2/3, and 4/3 units of the Electron mass. If the Moon +- feature has a (mass/wave) equivalent mass, its wave (Compton) will be in the order of 3.84401 x 10 to -17 cm and is equivalent mass energy will be [513,336] MeV +- or roughly about 6 times the mass energies of the W and Z Weak Vector Bosons. At that mass there will be some + - fluctuation due to variable drifts when factoring particle masses in eccentric sets with orbit/wave datas stamped in iron (as fixed constants). For instance the slightest discrete change in estimate upon the size of Earth's eccentricity will result in noticable drift in derived mass for the W and Z bosons. Tiny changes in the assumed orbit of the Moon, will have major changes upon a resulting mass for a fundamental entity mass. EARTH ECCENTRICITY ------------------ Z o = h^/(Earth eccentricity) = 78,881.0757663 MeV W + - = h^/(Earth eccentricity) - moon = 93,202.9697111 Mev ACCELARATOR SMASHES Weak Vector Bosons ------------------- Z o = [91,187] MeV FIT W + - = [80,220] MeV FIT - end of HIGGS - PART 17 ------------------------------------------------------ MOVE THE OUTER PLANETS OVER TO THE ELECTRON ------------------------------------------------------------ Sun -|- Point of Center | | Mercury -|- Playing with Mars | Venus -|- Host to 3/2- XION harmonics | Earth -|- Host to 1/2+ XION harmonics | Mars -|- Playing with the Proton | | - 4 planets | ---------------- JUPITER -|- Hanging around mediating + 4 planets | 7/2 x 1/FSC = N^ | | Saturn -|- Host to the PION | 2 E x FSC | Uranus -|- Electron power amplification | 1 E x FSC | | The energy equivalent of the | Classical Electron Radius | Neptune -|- Electron power amplification | 2/3 E x FSC | Pluto -|- Electron power amplification | 1/2 E x FSC | | ===================================================================== Here are factored (wave/orbit) datas for the outer planets, based on approximations to a power amplitude unit comprising the ELECTRON (E) times the FSC. ===================================================================== for | E x FSC = 70.025262505 MeV when | E = .510999065 MeV -------|---------- | | | 7/2 E x FSC factor JUPITER | h^/Jupiter = 253.526682297 MeV | x 2/7 = 72.436199942 MeV | - 2 N^ + 1/3 E -|- = 70.019891963 MeV | ------------ | 2 E x FSC factor SATURN | h^/Saturn = 138.281948660 MeV | + N^ + E = 140.086265725 MeV -|- x 1/2 = 70.025262505 MeV | ------------ | 1 E x FSC factor URANUS | h^/Uranus = 69.628291267 MeV | + N^ - 2/3 E -|- = 70.069944159 MeV | ------------ | 2/3 E x FSC factor NEPTUNE | h^/Neptune = 43.883763386 MeV | - N^ + 8 E x 3/2 -|- = 70.017656859 MeV | ------------ | 1/2 E x FSC factor PLUTO | h^/Pluto = 33.445304979 MeV | + 2 N^ - 4 E -|- = 70.019885699 MeV | ------------ | ===================================================================== Except for the SATURN (wave/orbit) data there is nothing definative about these derivations. It is just that there are no other elements of energy in the physics of particle mass that occurs in the region 1.293318 MeV right up to mass of the MUON at 105.658 MeV, except for the ELECTRON times FSC (the Fine Structure Constant) at 70.02526250 MeV. And here is it in basic whole integer ratio approximations to the outer planets by co-incidence or not via the digits of the outer planet's orbits in the CGS system. ===================================================================== Planet orbits are not known to be in any lineal summed order, other than in an approximating geometric progression known as Bode's Law in which AU (Astronomical Unit) orbits loosely follow the digital numbers of the Fibonnaci series of golden ratio harmonics. Bode's Law was sucessful in suggesting approximate orbital distances for Uranus and Pluto, which were later found, but did not include an orbit for Neptune. In light of this, Bode's Law is concidered by many to be an act of co-incidence. SOLAR (WAVE/MASS) HARMONICS co-incidence? Another co-incidence (or not) involved ratio units of E x FSC and includes Neptune, but is only good for the outer planets Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, and Pluto. The co-incidence side is that inner planet orbits do not fall into line in any clear cut fashion as do the outer four orbits. On the other side, the non co-incidence side is due to fact that there are no possible candidates for (wave/mass) interactions for mass energy equivalents for the outer planets, except for only four mass energy equivalents which actually do occur in the mass range of particle physics in the range from the Electron through to the Pion particle. The muon is within this range, but is not seen in the (orbit/mass) correspondences of the planets. What are seen are amplified Electron mass units. Specifically, the mass energies of 1/2 E x FSC, 2/3 x E, 1 E x FSC, and 2 E x FSC, (where E is Electron mass). These fall directly in line as (orbit/wave) correspondences for the outer four planet orbits. Saturn h^/(orbit/mass) approximates the MeV of 2 E x FSC Uranus h^/(orbit/mass) approximates the MeV of 1 E x FSC Neptune h^/(orbit/mass) approximates the MeV of 2/3 E x FSC Pluto h^/(orbit/mass) approximates the MeV of 1/2 E x FSC 1 E x FSC is a mass energy equivalent for the classical Electron Radius, and 1/2 E x FSC is a mass energy equivalent if the Electron Radius was concidered instead an Electron Diameter, so that the term 2 PI instead of 4 PI turned up in derivations of certain fundamental constants. Mercury Venus ---------- Earth --------- h^ /(orbit/mass) = 1319.04938308 Mars - 4 PLANETS -------------- JUPITER h^ /(mean orbit) = 253.526682297 MeV x 3/2 + 1 Electron + 1 Proton = 1319.07333250 MeV h^ /(mass/orbit) 1319.07333250 MeV = Earth mean orbit = 1.4959 52108 divide by 1.4959 7928 = 99.9981843 % -------------- JUPITER h^ /(mean orbit) = 253.526682297 MeV + 4 PLANETS Saturn h^/(orbit/mass) = MeV of 2 E x FSC Uranus h^/(orbit/mass) = MeV of 1 E x FSC Neptune h^/(orbit/mass) = MeV of 2/3 E x FSC Pluto h^/(orbit/mass) = MeV of 1/2 E x FSC NOTE 1 Electron x FSC is the MeV mass energy equivalent for the classical Electron radius one of the most fundamental among the physical constants. SMOKE FROM THE GREAT PYRAMID ------------------------------------- wiring the sky with fancy logic In which 70.02 MeV factors were already readily at hand for the four outer planets, the question a challenge it being is there a similar unit to be found in inner planet factors.... The answer is yes, if you restore the Hubble telescope to its original condition, and go back to the days when the best astronomers described canals on MARS in detail. --------- MERCURY h^ /(mean orbit) = 3456.36490683 reduce by 49 - E = 1 Electron x FSC = 70.027060258 MeV ============ --------- VENUS h^ /(mean orbit) = - 6 Electron reduce by 26 = 1 Electron x FSC = 70.019534998 MeV ============ --------- EARTH h^ /(mean orbit) + 3 Electron reduce by 19 + 1 Electron = 1 Electron x FSC = 70.015334863 MeV ============ --------- MARS h^ /(mean orbit) = 865.693492707 reduce by 12 - 4 E = 1 Electron x FSC = 70.097128132 MeV ============ also --------- MARS h^ /(mean orbit) = 865.693492707 - Proton mass = 72.578817292 - 5 electron = 1 Electron x FSC = 70.023821967 MeV ============ for E = .510988552 MeV ----------- .510999065 MeV FIT - 4 PLANETS --------------- JUPITER h^ /(mean orbit) = 253.526682297 MeV + 4 PLANETS - N^ MeV reduce by 7/2 - 4 Electrons = 1 Electron x FSC = 70.026691593 MeV ============ also --------------- JUPITER h^ /(mean orbit) = 253.526682297 MeV times 3/2 + 1 Electron + 1 Proton = 1319.07333250 MeV h^ /(mass/orbit) 1319.07333250 MeV = Earth mean orbit = 1.495952108 ------------- 1.49597928 = 99.9981843 % --------- SATURN h^ /(mean orbit) = 138.281948660 MeV + N^ + 1 Electron reduce by 4/2 = 1 Electron x FSC = 70.025261820 MeV ============ --------- URANUS h^ /(mean orbit) = 68.765314337 MeV + N^ reduce by 2/2 = 1 Electron x FSC = 70.058632337 MeV ============ here comes neptune --------- NEPTUNE h^ /(mean orbit) = 43.883763377 MeV + N^ + 3 Electron raise by 3/2 = 1 Electron x FSC = 70.065117871 MeV ============ --------- PLUTO h^ /(mean orbit) = 33.445304979 MeV + N^ + 1/2 Electron raise by 4/2 - 1/3 Electron = 1 Electron x FSC = 70.041770860 MeV ============ NOTE 33.445603300 also approximates the (Pion - Muon) mass difference PION MUON (139.56995) FIT - (105.658389) FIT = 33.400561940 + 1 Electron - end of PART 17: MOVE THE OUTER PLANETS OVER TO THE ELECTRON - PART 18 ------------------------------------------------------ GRAVITATIONAL CONSTANT SPECULATION ------------------------------------------------------------ It can be suggested that a monumental project can be undertaken in which planetary orbits are derived from particle (mass/wave) harmonics to as high an accuracy as deemed fitting wherein the derived (wave/orbit) planet values are then used in a discrete reverse engineering, to derive the gravitational constant, all planets as individually derived from (wave/orbit)) values, all hustled to extract a singlular gravitational constant for each including each derived eccentricity. The project will succeed if the derived Universal Gravitational constant comes the same to high digital accuracy for all of the planets involved. PART 19 ------------------------------------------------------ BOOMS FROM THE ROOMS OF JUPITER ------------------------------------------------------------ A question has been hanging tough since day one. If SATURN holds a metaphorical/modelling image for the PION, what does JUPITER have to offer. Well, actually, not much, it seems, in any stark fashion. No PROTON standing naked here, for instance. Instead, JUPITER's contribution is a balloon unit, to wit: h^/(Jupiter) = 253.526682297 MeV which is the lineal sum mass unit increment for the 1/2+ SIGMA o stable octuplet particle (1192.55) MeV FIT when 253.526682297 MeV + P+ + N^ - E = 1192.58131123 MeV This is very close to the 1/2+ SIGMA o mass gained from VENUS, via the string: h^/(Venus) - Moon - P+ x 2/7 + P+ + E = 1192.56210445 MeV which is identical to the 1/2+ SIGMA o mass gained from EARTH, via the string: h^/(Earth) - P+ x 2/3 + P+ + N^ - 5/3 E = 1192.56534494 MeV Otherwise, hohum, hacking could seem to produce just about any desired relationship. And then a B O N A N Z A ! When the eccentricity of JUPITER is explored, (Jupiter mean of orbit - perihelion), the 1/2 wave value is a mass that lands in the midst of UPSILON particle masses but is not matched by any experiment. However, when the moon of Earth's orbit is added and subtracted to the Jupiter eccentricity factor, in a simple lineal sum array, two precise UPSILON states are seen in an instant, these being the S 3 and S 4 masses. The wide arm embrace offered by the wave (Compton) values for these states is so exact that over a dozen other particle masses can be determined as a direct consequence of the two mass's resonances. The fact that the two mass resonances have two Compton wavelengths which are matched by the wide arms of Jupiter's eccentricity is astonishing, when it is concidered that there is no deviation from solar orbital data, except for a tiny discrete downshift in the value assigned for the orbit of the moon of Earth, which then results in a seeming set of CONSTANT values for the S 3 and S 4 UPSILON mass states of such accuracy that dozens of particle masses can be linked together in a running cascade of interlinked masses spanning a range beginning from the start of J/PSI charmed particle occurrences to high in the upper range of UPSILONS, with all masses calculated, and all mass/energies used as intervals between, lock stepped together in accuracies to 6 and 7 significant digits for their masses. Unquestionable eccentricity fundamental. Hence the word B O N A N Z A ! Jupiter was then also found later to be parading around the giant hexagram which holds the Trojans arm in arm with MARS leaving a trail of stable ETAs at every gravitational whump and conjunction. IN OSCILLATING ENGINEERING -------------------------- Initial Plank's converting Final Plank's converted h^/(Jupiter) x 3/2 + P+ + E x 1/h^ gains an EARTH orbit as 1.4959 51208 x 10 to 13 cm compared to the real EARTH 1.4959 7927 x 10 to 13 cm In the calculator logic system used for these derivations the term 1/h^ is impractical, due to digital truncation inherent in the reciprocal of 1/h^ = 1/1973.27053320 = .ooo506772 and so the 'oscillating engineering' string is factored in two parts, as: Initial Plank's converting -------------------------- h^/(Jupiter) x 3/2 + P+ + E = Initial MeV _ = 1319.07412251 MeV Final Plank's converted ----------------------- h^/(Initial) = 1.4959 51208 x 10 to 13 cm where EARTH orbit is 1.4959 7927 x 10 to 13 cm and _ h^/(Earth) = 1319.04938308 MeV ANOTHER 'OSCILLATING ENGINEERING' EXAMPLE FOR JUPITER ------------------------------------------------------- h^/(Jupiter) x 3 - P+ change sign - N^ + 5/3 E _ = 177.250610216 MeV _ which approximates N^ x FSC for N^ = 1.293460286 MeV The REAL N^ = 1.293318 MeV FIT and closely approximates an EARTH orbit derivative as: h^/(Earth) - P+ x 7/3 x 1/5 - N^ + 5/3 E _ = 177.254314547 MeV _ which approximates N^ x FSC for N^ = 1.293487318 MeV Actually, this N^ extraction from JUPITER is just another of the BALLOON numbers in hiding, written a different way. The main BALLOON numbers for N^ oscillations are spelled forth in Yin Yang PROTON Ping.Pongs involving EARTH orbit under 'PROTON (plus.minus) PING.PONGS' in PART 10. in conjunction with 'THE YIN YANG AMPLITUDES' in PART 9. - end PART 19 - PART 20 ---------------------------------------------------- The Theory of Flutters ---------------------------------------------------------- An increasing impression is that when particles collide at high speed to produce energetic reactions which then decay the choice of decays may be due to flutters in the form of minor variants in resulted wavelengths due to variances in the major (wave/orbit) components if the components happen to comprise (plus.minus) factors in the (wave/orbit) terms which are further discretely modified by (plus.minus) moon terms. Since, for instance a whole number of KAONS of both charges seem to be cropping up, each with tiny variances in resulting mass but major differences in their component constructs, the flutter idea may be involved. ULTRA SMALL VARIABLES --------------------- In going for the final iotas, it has been noticed with routine regularity that ultra small units of mass can seem to abound in clicking together hooks and links to comprise particles. Question is are these ultra tiny units of mass, mirages, or real. In the main, the ultra tiny units of mass can comprise the Electron's Rydberg Energy Constant (binding energy); the so-called NEUTRINO used in this disclosure as N^ x 1/FSC squared; or also, a 1/3 unit of Electron mass x 1/FSC; and 2/3 E x 1/FSC, and so on. On the planetary side, a planet (wave/orbit) augmented by the planet's radius in plus or minus fashion, usually plus, can seem to cause certain things to line up winch fashion. The problem is, that a minute change in one variable (input for instance), can result in minute changes in other variables (end product of a string) for instance, where any ultra small units of mass seemingly inherent will be different. Wooooh ! So, the sting is in place; if ultra small units of mass are valid, just what actual ultra smalls the units are, is up for grabs. If you want ultra smalls you've