to bottom  


COLLABORATING PROOF THAT SMALL 'GLOBULAR' GALAXIES CLUSTER AROUND GIANT ELLIPTICAL GALAXIES



If one
wants to argue
that white blobs enhanced
to near oblitera are not a demonstration
of small galaxies attached in gravitational interaction
with the hems of giant ellipticals, or that small
galaxies can flow in streams of entropy in
and around the big ones, look to
clearcut images in which
small ones are
everywhere
in same
kind and
entropy excitements
as shown in the Perseus galaxy
cluster images here, and collaborating images also with
small 'globular' galaxies toward the direction of the Pisces constellation

See also   tympani   resonators


=========== RADIAL ROSETTE IN THE PERSEUS GALAXY CLUSTER



BIG DISCOVERY - GIGANTIC 'RADIAL ROSETTE'
IN A HUGE SUPER CLUSTER OF GALAXIES

Image 1

In the
Perseus
galaxy cluster,
each fuzzy dot is said by
by astronomers to be a galaxy,
it teems with uncounted thousands of galaxies.
Image 1 does not enhance very well to show the rosette.
Image 2 (as is, swifted from the Internet), shows a
mostly complete rosette but some is missing

Image 2



PROVISO

I have
been assuming
the rosette (upper right)
is made of galaxies not Milky Way
stars superimposed on the deep field view.
The only way to tell for sure is to delete from an
image any Milky Way stars (by their characteristic near
'star' spectrums) and keep the galaxies identified
by galaxy spectrums and their deep
space red shifts







Above,
filaments
between galaxies
and tendrils, ordain a
compact super galactic area
in which countless smaller galaxies
are seen in rings around giant elipticals,
with the 'radial rosette' dominating the upper
right picture frame. Bubbles and cell walls
between different media densities of deep
space and galaxy quanties
are apparent

More highly enhanced









Here
next the
radial rosette
more definatively profiled,
as well, the clustering of smaller
galaxies in 'orbits' around the bigger elliptical
giants is very plainly seen, the nature however of the
photo itself (and enhancement technique) not able
to reveal if the 'orbitals' are steady state (like
planets) or are they constantly changing
and transmuting as the galaxies do
a gravity dance around each
other in the cluster
over time.
Be in
awe, nonetheless.
Each white blob and fuzz is
supposed to be a galaxy in this largest
galaxy cluster known. In further awe is the fact
that smaller galaxies take up root in necklace strings
or orbitals around the larger, as these Perseus
Cluster enhancements clearly show





The
above as
downloaded from
the Astronomy Picture
of The Day site in Antwerp has
a wash of grey over its whole, when
enhanced, and practically no stereo, but is
still useful to show the greater area of the
rosette. The original is shown as a single
mono full size, next below. The rosette
is against the edge in the
upper right


Original









On
the other
hand it translated
particularly well into a small
pieced zoomed in 'histogram equalize'
enhancement. The 'frosty the snowman' coating
of snowballs in and around the elliptical giants, and
thin sills and filaments that interweave, are particularly
well seen. It looks like fierce mucho' is happening in the
alley between the two giants. We can also tell the left
giant is coming down on a trajectory canted
slightly left, a strewing wake of
moil and distortion marks
its forward motion

In Image 3
you can see
where galaxy's are
on the move, a main migratory
pattern horizontally biased from the right

Image 3

A large
galaxy seems to
be a migrating comet
up into the upper right, a
sickle back ridge down the lower
right photo edge shows the path of something
which has either migrated out of view or has moved in
to the center bunch. A large sweeping swirl in the left field
seems to be a clump of galaxies which have spun out and are orbiting
around back to the main group, the orbiter currently in the left
below mid-line at the end of the circular swirls, which means
a very strong strange attractor force is causing
the galaxy clump to home back into
the main cluster, the homing
pigeons seem to make
a smooth ellipse
as the flock heads
back to the main colony





Image 4

Image 4
seems to show
another galaxy, which
has burst through from hidden
rearspace, breaking forth into camera
range on a straight line to the south/west, leaving
a thin vector in its wake. This newcomer has interrupted
the concentric rings being left behind by the orbiting
small clump of galaxies, causing a secondary set
of small concentric rings at right angles
at the point of interrupt

ANALYSING MOTIONS

These
concentrics
may be percussive
manifestions of gravitic
seas energies, whose properties
are outlined here 1 and manifestions
shown here 2 and here 3.

Here is
an example of
concentrics, percussion caused,
the concentrics identified here. Go to these
clicks for risky thoughts on Mercury, and Neutrinos

And
finally a
last backward glance
at the snowballs festooning the
domains of giant galaxies with hard core physics



Enhanced magnification from a DSS image shows 'radial formation' though not the precise wheel-spoked 'Rosette' seen in the other image, and myriad small golden snowballs are not seen





=========== GRAVITIC SEAS


Distortion from a distant galaxy cluster in Pisces

 

 

 

 

 

HUNDRED OF GALAXIES CLUSTERED EN MASSE

Actually,
there are over
a hundred if not hundreds
of galaxies in and immediately
adjacent the area marked as
gravitationally 'lensed'
by the astronomer's
circle. If every
little golden
orb, and
white
dot is
counted, there
are hundreds of galaxies.
Astronomers count 'a small cluster
'of about 15 galaxies', but, the counters did
not enhance their VLT image the way I did to see hundreds,
which raises a second point - that the VLT telescope
can be very efficient at capturing and storing
dim medias in its digital synapses

The
satellite
galaxies in the
halos of the more massive
ellipticals and flowing in streams
in and around the big ones, cannot for the
most part be seen in the original, only
high enhancement (actually to quite
an extreme degree) shows the
small guys successfully



GRAVITIC SEAS

The
blue enhanced
image versions above
are riddled with small concentric
rills of short length, these contentrics
seem to be everywhere. The possibility is
these curved short rills are a show of
gravitic seas gravity wave energies
seen at extreme long distances
of 3 billion light years
away, if close up
these rills
would be
enormous and
extremely powerful
energy storehouses, perhaps.
The above blue enhancements are at the
limits of image expansion, any more zoom to see
more of the rill nature in closeup causes the
nature of the rills to dissolve away



Above,
notice
at once an
irregular rift
across the top left
to right, this deep space
gash seems real and in interest
apart from the hundreds of galaxies
seen in enhanced closeups



The
size of the
bare naked white circle
is a direct reflection on the size
of the importance attached by astronomers to
this lensed cluster. A smaller ring thick enough
to circle the area but not obliterate, would have
allowed far better view into the area to see
nearly every one of the small golden
globular galaxies, some of which
are obliterated by a
solid circle

MERCURY IMPACT CRATER NAMED DEGAS - A RADIAL ROSETTE

Impact
crater named
Degas on Mercury has
formed a distinct 'radial rosette'
even though the topology of the terrain is very
irregular, the fundamental 'rosette' pattern is clear,
including part circular resonance rings of different radii around the
main impact. Watch what happens when the images are turned upside down. The
first of each next is as down loaded from a top astronomy planetary resources
site (now a defunct link), the second has been turned upside
down by me, and voila! all features instantly become
anatomically correct. What's going on here,
cannot astronomers recognize the
difference between an
innee and an outee



Original









ASIDE FOOTNOTE

An idea
has popped into
mind with no apparent place
to put it, here next seems as good
a place as any. The idea is as follows

=========== THE ENERGY REALM OF GRAVITIC SEAS EFFECTS GENERAL RELATIVITY ?


Einstein
general relativity
has accounted for mysterious
out of synch in Mercury's point of procession
(or precession) of Mercury's ellipse of orbit, except,
the general relativity account is not perfect it is said to be
out of sync itself by an annoying small amount. What if energies
of gravitic seas are involved in the general relativity statements
- where gravitic seas (gravity waves made of energy not mass)
are interracting with the motion and mass of Mercury, in
this case the interractions (being energy not
mass) fall outside the general
rules of gravity and
not be effected
by general
relativity, the
effect of gravitic sea
energy on the small mass of Mercury
would be almost negliable but, still, accountable

NEUTRINOS SPONTANIOUSLY CHANGE STATE VIA INTERRACT WITH GRAVITIC SEAS ?

In a
second
supposition,
do Neutrinos have
enough minimum mass (even
though mostly energy) to interract
with gravitic seas, interraction perhaps
causing abrupt Muon kind and other
Neutrino transfers back and
forth, the Sun's own
gravitic sea of
gravitational
wave energies may
be enough in energy
field strengths to trigger
mass exchanges of Neutrinos by means of
energy/mass conversions back and forth the extra 'energy'
supplied for free by Neutron interractive passage through gravitic
seas, a Neutrino slam through a gravitic wave - if the wave is
strong enough - evoking a weak vector boson (which are
the exchange particles for Neutrinos) which does the
job of switching a Neutrino to a higher state,
quess that the slam is accumulative - if
the Neutrino slams cross section
through the gravitic strand
little happens, if the
Neutrino happens
to travel along
the length of the
wave a lot can result in
inevitable gain interractively
accumulating, in effect the gain continues
until the Neutrino suddenly explodes into a new steady
state more energetic form (for instance Muon or Tau) and
its accumulating weak vector boson threshold vanishes some
of the boson's powers transferred into new properties of
the new higher state Neutrino. If a neutrino
is passing in the wrong direction
along the positive and
negative charged
pole axis
of the
gravitic
strand, the
opposite can happen, a
weak vector boson of opposite
charge this time forming in the Neutrino
rather than a travelling bunchup along the gravitic
strand, until presto the higher state Neutrino vanishes
and we are back to a lower state Neutrino such
as Electron. This schemerino does not
account for Neutrino results
striking particles
such as Protons,
at least I do
not know so,
I think this is
a reasonably risky
explanation as to how
Neutrinos can switch states when
leaving the Sun, or travelling to Earth's Neutrino detectors



  email     home   Web site/display/designs/image enhancements - Greydon Moore
World's largest cosmic teaching site - Ottawa 2001/2004    

    form   A & O 3 3                 to top  

                  Click google logo for site search
  Click for site search  

For the world's most comprehensive searches use   Visit Webcrawl


  Click for Industrial Strength Astronomy home  
  New Proton Page     New Physics Index  
  Crash course   Fast crash course in astronomy
More advanced at top of home




Available Downloads

DRUMBALLIA    ODDESSY    CLIFFR    CONTACT