Distortion from a
distant galaxy cluster in Pisces
HUNDRED OF GALAXIES CLUSTERED EN MASSE
Actually,
there are over
a hundred if not hundreds
of galaxies in and immediately
adjacent the area marked as
gravitationally 'lensed'
by the astronomer's
circle. If every
little golden
orb, and
white
dot is
counted, there
are hundreds of galaxies.
Astronomers count 'a small cluster
'of about 15 galaxies', but, the counters did
not enhance their VLT image the way I did to see hundreds,
which raises a second point - that the VLT telescope
can be very efficient at capturing and storing
dim medias in its digital synapses
The
satellite
galaxies in the
halos of the more massive
ellipticals and flowing in streams
in and around the big ones, cannot for the
most part be seen in the original, only
high enhancement (actually to quite
an extreme degree) shows the
small guys successfully
GRAVITIC SEAS
The
blue enhanced
image versions above
are riddled with small concentric
rills of short length, these contentrics
seem to be everywhere. The possibility is
these curved short rills are a show of
gravitic seas gravity wave energies
seen at extreme long distances
of 3 billion light years
away, if close up
these rills
would be
enormous and
extremely powerful
energy storehouses, perhaps.
The above blue enhancements are at the
limits of image expansion, any more zoom to see
more of the rill nature in closeup causes the
nature of the rills to dissolve away
Above,
notice
at once an
irregular rift
across the top left
to right, this deep space
gash seems real and in interest
apart from the hundreds of galaxies
seen in enhanced closeups
The
size of the
bare naked white circle
is a direct reflection on the size
of the importance attached by astronomers to
this lensed cluster. A smaller ring thick enough
to circle the area but not obliterate, would have
allowed far better view into the area to see
nearly every one of the small golden
globular galaxies, some of which
are obliterated by a
solid circle
MERCURY IMPACT CRATER NAMED DEGAS - A RADIAL ROSETTE
Impact
crater named
Degas on Mercury has
formed a distinct 'radial rosette'
even though the topology of the terrain is very
irregular, the fundamental 'rosette' pattern is clear,
including part circular resonance rings of different radii around the
main impact. Watch what happens when the images are turned upside down. The
first of each next is as down loaded from a top astronomy planetary resources
site (now a defunct link), the second has been turned upside
down by me, and voila! all features instantly become
anatomically correct. What's going on here,
cannot astronomers recognize the
difference between an
innee and an outee
Original
ASIDE FOOTNOTE
An idea
has popped into
mind with no apparent place
to put it, here next seems as good
a place as any. The idea is as follows
===========
THE ENERGY REALM OF GRAVITIC SEAS EFFECTS GENERAL RELATIVITY ?
|
Einstein
general relativity
has accounted for mysterious
out of synch in Mercury's point of procession
(or precession) of Mercury's ellipse of orbit, except,
the general relativity account is not perfect it is said to be
out of sync itself by an annoying small amount. What if energies
of gravitic seas are involved in the general relativity statements
- where gravitic seas (gravity waves made of
energy not mass)
are interracting with the motion and mass of Mercury, in
this case the interractions (being energy not
mass) fall outside the general
rules of gravity and
not be effected
by general
relativity, the
effect of gravitic sea
energy on the small mass of Mercury
would be almost negliable but, still, accountable
NEUTRINOS
SPONTANIOUSLY CHANGE STATE VIA INTERRACT WITH GRAVITIC SEAS ?
In a
second
supposition,
do Neutrinos have
enough minimum mass (even
though mostly energy) to interract
with gravitic seas, interraction perhaps
causing abrupt Muon kind and other
Neutrino transfers back and
forth, the Sun's own
gravitic sea of
gravitational
wave energies may
be enough in energy
field strengths to trigger
mass exchanges of Neutrinos by means of
energy/mass conversions back and forth the extra 'energy'
supplied for free by Neutron interractive passage through gravitic
seas, a Neutrino slam through a gravitic wave - if the wave is
strong enough - evoking a weak vector boson (which are
the exchange particles for Neutrinos) which does the
job of switching a Neutrino to a higher state,
quess that the slam is accumulative - if
the Neutrino slams cross section
through the gravitic strand
little happens, if the
Neutrino happens
to travel along
the length of the
wave a lot can result in
inevitable gain interractively
accumulating, in effect the gain continues
until the Neutrino suddenly explodes into a new steady
state more energetic form (for instance Muon or Tau) and
its accumulating weak vector boson threshold vanishes some
of the boson's powers transferred into new properties of
the new higher state Neutrino. If a neutrino
is passing in the wrong direction
along the positive and
negative charged
pole axis
of the
gravitic
strand, the
opposite can happen, a
weak vector boson of opposite
charge this time forming in the Neutrino
rather than a travelling bunchup along the gravitic
strand, until presto the higher state Neutrino vanishes
and we are back to a lower state Neutrino such
as Electron. This schemerino does not
account for Neutrino results
striking particles
such as Protons,
at least I do
not know so,
I think this is
a reasonably risky
explanation as to how
Neutrinos can switch states when
leaving the Sun, or travelling to Earth's Neutrino detectors
|
|
Web site/display/designs/image enhancements - Greydon Moore
World's largest cosmic teaching site - Ottawa 2001/2004
form
A
&
O
3
3
|
Click google logo for site search
For the world's most comprehensive searches use
|